Indian Boilers Act 1923 5 Of 1923 Section 28 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers act 1923 5 of 1923 section 28 Year: 1990 Page 1 of about 303 results (0.938 seconds)Calorex India Ltd. Vs. Tara Properties Pvt. Ltd.
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : May-11-1990
Reported in : [1991]72CompCas429(Cal)
is controlled by various provisions of the statute viz the indian boilers act 1923 and the rules framed thereunder by reason observe considering however the report of the chief inspector of boilers and considering the fact that progoti chemical industries would be for payment of the same and the official liquidator shall act in accordance with law in the matter of payment of various provisions of the statute viz the indian boilers act 1923 and the rules framed thereunder by reason whereof this court law and justice and law will cease to have legitimacy 5 in this application for disclaimer under the provisions of the the facts of the matter under consideration vis a vis section 14 of the act it is to be seen that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. East India Electric Supply and Traction ...
Court : Kolkata
Decided on : Dec-14-1990
Reported in : [1991]188ITR717(Cal)
the tribunal also placed reliance on rule 26 of the indian electricity act which deals with the form of disclosure of capital expenditure and in the said statement of capital expenditure boilers switchgears transformers etc are all separate items right from the an electricity generating company just as in the banking companies act and in the insurance act separate forms of disclosure of depreciation at the rate of 10 i e rs 1 52 714 and an equal amount as extra shift allowance the naming them that is precisely what has been done in section iv of the appendix 19 the old rules prescribed two
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajinder Parshad Vs. State
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-04-1990
Reported in : 1990(3)Crimes287; 43(1991)DLT28; 1990(19)DRJ332
him benefit of doubt 16 section 165 a of the indian penal code has made the person offering bribe guilty of discharged fine if paid shall be refunded prevention of corruption act 1947 section 5 1 d 5 2 and section 161 is however pertinent to note that chaman lal public witness 5 and jagdish chander public witness 6 have not made a entitled to the acquittal giving him benefit of doubt 16 section 165 a of the indian penal code has made the to bring home guilt against the appellant beyond reasonable doubt 28 as a result the appeal is accepted conviction and sentence
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaghubar Dayal Vs. Distt. Judge, Etah and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-11-1990
Reported in : 1990Supp(1)SCC285
suit in this case was filed in 1974 after the act came into force and section 39 is applicable only to filing of the usual undertaking within four weeks from today v ramaswamy and k ramaswamy jj the respondent landlord filed a the appellant contended that the question whether the deposit under section 39 should include the advocate s fee or not is was originally dismissed by a judgment and decree dated july 28 1976 however the learned district judge etah allowed the revision
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTE. Merck (India) Limited Vs. V.N. Parulekar and ors.
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Nov-23-1990
Reported in : 1991(2)BomCR201; [1991(63)FLR401]; (1994)IIILLJ546Bom; 1991(1)MhLj540
the abovereferred recommendations of the international labour organisation in the indian iron and steel co ltd their workmen reported in 1958 of the long standing practice of the department that the boiler should not be left unattended even if the duty hours to the benefit of section 89 of the income tax act 1961 i am adopting this course following the judgment of directed the management to pay a sum of rs 1 50 000 to the workman concerned towards compensation in lieu of arrest or order any person to arrest the offender under section 44 of the code that power is vested in the working as a boiler attendant at the material time on 28th november 1977 the petitioner company served a show cause notice
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDattu Nathu Kudekar and anr. Vs. the National Insurance Company and or ...
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Dec-11-1990
Reported in : II(1991)ACC8; 1991ACJ743; AIR1991Guj126; (1991)1GLR534
himself was the owner of another car insured with the indian trade and general insurance co ltd the policy taken out insurance compensation sections 95 and 110 b of motor vehicles act 1939 appeal against award of compensation contention that insurance company amount provided under schedule iv of the workmen compensation act 1923 10 all the opponents namely the present appellant and the 5 78 were travelling in the early morning on 13 5 1978 in the truck belonging to the appellant no 2 no sum shall be payable by an insurer under sub section 1 in respect of any judgment unless before or after common judgment by the learned motor accident claims tribunal on 28 2 1979 all the appeals and the special civil applications
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNarasingha Choudhury Vs. State
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Sep-21-1990
Reported in : 71(1991)CLT717; 1991CriLJ1025
1 the petitioner was convicted under section 41 of the indian electricity act for having violated the provisions of section 28 involves the concept of a commercial activity and hence the act complained of must be supply of energy to the public the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that neither section 28 nor section 41 has any application to the facts of illegal conduct to which exception is taken under section 28 is that the person who is not a licencee must
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. Smt. Lakshmi and Anoth ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jan-17-1990
Reported in : 1991ACJ239; [1993]76CompCas600(Kar); ILR1990KAR573
of no fault could be incorporated there is also no bar to the making of two independent applications one claiming compensation 110a but an application only under section 92a of the act the tribunal therefore remained under an erroneous impression that the person under the worker s compensation act 1923 8 of 1923 resulting from an accident of the nature referred to in of sub section 2 of the said provision sub section 5 of section 95 limits the liability of the insurer to that the six months period prescribed for an application under section 110a of the act would be or is a period co ltd v immam aminasab nadaf 1990 67 comp cas 287 ilr 1990 kar 16 the tribunal could not have directed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmarjeet Kaur Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Sep-21-1990
Reported in : 43(1991)DLT262
well settled after reviewing the english as well as the indian decisions in para 23 of the judgments the supreme court support of his submission that an instrumentality of state cannot act arbitrarily in matters of termination of service in central inland same pay the provisions of the indian official secrets act 1923 will be applicable as in the case of similar officers a single isolated post on a fixed honorarium of rs 5000 00 per months an appointment to an office under the wide generali ations on the theory of arbitrariness of government sections unwittingly attributed to the previous decisions of the supreme court of any practical consequence can be passed by the court 28 we have already rejected the submission of the counsel for
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDhondubai Vs. Proprietor, Jankidas Khandsari Sugar Factory, Partners a ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Sep-20-1990
Reported in : 1991ACJ954; (1991)93BOMLR556; (1993)IIILLJ804Bom; 1991(1)MhLj624
act way back in 1923 moreover the act unlike the code is not merely a procedural statute it is a substantive settle the dispute arising out of the proceedings under the act section 30 provides for an appeal to the high court used with definite significance in the act way back in 1923 moreover the act unlike the code is not merely a v dr ajay upadyay anr 2006 cri lj 4274 2006 5 air bom r held per incuriam the act with its compensation as an authority for the purposes of the act section 19 lays down that the commissioner shall settle the dispute 1923 hereinafter referred to as the act 2 on december 28 of 1865 her majesty the queen victoria of england as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT