Increasing - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: increasing Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 1,467 results (0.027 seconds)Eicher Limited Through Bimal Sachdeva Vs. Himachal Pradesh Housing Boa ...
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-29-2001
Reported in: AIR2002HP135
..... these properties stood vested in eicher tractors limited by operation of law and therefore unearned increase clause was not invokable it was also pointed out that the merger amalgamation took place ..... the defendant if the defendant board is restrained from taking steps to recover the unearned increase and cancelling the lease or interfering with plaintiffs possession 21 on april 17 2000 ex parte .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Hatter
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-21-2001
..... pension system for federal judges whose financial obligations and payroll deductions therefore had to increase a number of federal judges appointed before 1983 filed this suit arguing that the ..... a contributory program without a choice their financial obligations and payroll deductions had to increase and this last mentioned group consisted almost exclusively of federal judges b this litigation .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSterlite Industries (India) Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of ...
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Oct-22-2001
..... appellant which facilitated market manipulation later the appellant provided an exit route when the artificial increase in price was not sustained and some of the brokers dealing for damayanti group ..... forward positions substantial number of shares were on an account of damayanti group this abnormal increase in carry forward position resulted in cornering of the shares damayanti group took delivery .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGlover Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-09-2001
..... affecting the calculation of a sentence because the sentence increase does not meet some baseline standard of prejudice authority does not ..... claim for ineffective assistance of counsel requires a significant increase in a term of imprisonment the seventh circuit s rule is ..... guidelines when an error by counsel led to an increased sentence we hold that the seventh circuit erred in engrafting this .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGitlitz Vs. Commissioner
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-09-2001
..... made after the basis adjustment and passthrough petitioners must pass through the discharged debt increase corporate bases and then deduct their losses all before any attribute reduction could occur ..... to s corporation shareholders consequently the insolvent s corporation s cod income would not increase the shareholder s basis and would not help the shareholder take otherwise unavailable deductions .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGujarat Housing Board, Ahmedabad Vs. Harilal Jethalal
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Feb-01-2001
Reported in: AIR2001Guj259
..... the parties the respondent was not entitled to claim any increase in rates then in that event the respondent was contending ..... further argued that the respondent could not have claimed any increase in the rates in view of the clear stipulation contained ..... court had considered all the relevant aspects namely justification for the increase recommendation made by the officer and admission of the price .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManjushree Extrusions Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Assam and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Mar-27-2001
..... of the industries undertaking expansion modernisation and diversification shall be limited to the increase in production due to expansion modernisation and diversification the said scheme provided ..... the date of commencement of production after the completion of theexpansion modernisation diversification increase in production of an industrial unit after the completion of expansion moderntsation .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRadhe Shyam Tulsian and ors. Vs. Panchmukhi Investment Ltd. and
Court: Company Law Board CLB
Decided on: Oct-16-2001
Reported in: (2003)113CompCas298
..... documents filed before the litigation started between the parties do not indicate either the increase in the authorised capital or issue of equi preference shares all the statutory returns ..... filed after the litigation started showing the increase in authorized capital and issue allotment or equi preference shares are undoubtedly fabricated without .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS. Ajit Singh Vs. Dss Enterprises (P.) Ltd.
Court: Company Law Board CLB
Decided on: Aug-31-2001
..... have given substantial returns so far as the alleged decision to increase the authorised capital from rs 2 crores to rs 9 ..... when the petitioners had refused to make investments the question of increasing the equity base of the respondent company and the issue ..... submissions that there was no oblique motive behind the resolutions to increase the share capital and the same was necessary for subscription .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNamita Gupta Vs. Cachar Native Joint Stock Co. Ltd.
Court: Company Law Board CLB
Decided on: Nov-29-2001
Reported in: (2002)110CompCas86
..... dated 26 6 1998 this bench had restrained the company from increasing its paid up capital the very purpose of accepting the money ..... allegedly elected on 29 11 1999 only with a view to increase the total voting power in the company the mala fide intention ..... voting power of surma which was stagnant for over sixty years was increased thereafter its control was handed over to unknown persons in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial