Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: income tax act 1961 chapter xiv procedure for assessment Court: karnataka Page 2 of about 934 results (0.733 seconds)

Aug 23 1999 (HC)

Smt. Prathiba Prasad Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2000KAR447; 2001(3)KarLJ302

ORDER1. The issues that arise for consideration in these two writ petitions are interrelated. The same shall therefore stand disposed of by this commonorder.2, Petitioner in W.P. No. 11519 of 1996 offers a training course in shorthand and Typewriting at Nagavarapalya, K.R. Puram in Bangalore. Recognition granted to the institute has been renewed from time to time as is evident from one such order produced by the petitioner. The petitioner in that petition has questioned the validity of an order dated 21st April, 1995 issued by the Commissioner of Public Instructions permitting the 4th respondent to establish a similar institute in the D.R.D.O. Complex, C.V. Raman Nagar, Bangalore. The challenge is primarily founded on the plea that the new institute permitted by the said order is within the prohibited distance of 1 km. from the petitioner-institute. While the matter was still pending in this Court, the Government appears to have issued instructions to the Commissioner of Public Instruc...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 2004 (HC)

P. Rajappa Alias B.P. Rajappa Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2004(4)KarLJ180

..... was issued to file objections; that objections were filed by the landowners, and after considering the same, the final notification under section 28(4) of the act has been issued.8. smt. shobha patil, learned additional government advocate for the 4th respondent-director of industries and commerce and smt. s. sujatha, learned ..... the material on record and the arguments held that the acquisition is for information technology park, which is an industrial infrastructural facility as defined under the act and the acquisition is for a public purpose. the learned single judge repelled the argument that the real purpose is not notified in the preliminary ..... 2001 (annexure-a to the writ petition) issued by the 1st respondent under section 3(1) of the karnataka industrial areas development act, 1966 (karnataka act 18 of 1966) (for short, 'the act'). by the said notification, the 1st respondent declared the area wherein the appellant-petitioner's land was situated as 'industrial area'. simultaneously .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 1985 (HC)

Mohammed Ghouse Vs. the Secretary, Karnataka Board of Wakfs, Bangalore ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1986Kant12; ILR1986KAR1523

..... the board has contributed rs. 11,000/- for the purpose of construction of the mosque. the petitioner has failed to have the wakf registered under chap. iv of the act. if only the petitioner had got it registered as wakf, it would have been entered in the register of wakfs which is required to be maintained under s. 26 of ..... his own or at the instance of the members of the muslim community of the village it was his duty to have the wakf registered under chap. iv of the act. in addition to this, it is pertinent to note that the board has contributed considerable sum for reconstruction of the mosque in question. it is stated in the petition ..... the board to ensure that the wakfs under its superintendence are properly maintained, controlled and administered and the income thereof is duly applied to the objects and purposes for which wakfs were created or intended. under s. 15(2)(g) of the act, one of the functions of the board is to appoint and remove mutawallis in accordance with the provisions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 1987 (HC)

Dr. P. Raghupathi Vs. Dr. R.G. Lavi

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1987KAR670

..... for him alone. it is a social welfare legislation to control the rents and evictions. it has to be interpreted keeping in view the interests of landlord and tenant. the act does not provide for granting of time. it stops at the passing of eviction decree granting of time is a judge made practice. it is done under the inherent powers .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 04 1989 (HC)

R. Krishnaswamy Rao Vs. Lakshmaiah Setty

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1990KAR369; 1989(3)KarLJ440

..... by consent of both sides the petition is heard for final disposal.2. in this civil revision petition under section 121-a of the karnataka land reforms act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') the petitioner has challenged the order dated 19-4-1989 passed by the land reforms appellate authority, mandya in appeal no. 372 of 1986 allowing ..... , his claim was confined to only 17 guntas. it was open to him to make a fresh claim before the expiry of the last date fixed under the act. however, no such attempt was made by the first respondent. the application seeking amendment came to be filed only after the tribunal rejected the application filed by the ..... not possible to hold that it is not a fresh area claimed by the applicant. as the claim has a serious consequence on the proprietory right and the act prescribes the last date for making such a claim any other interpretation would result in serious miscarriage of justice and it would seriously jeopardise the proprietory right because .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 1993 (HC)

Maruthi Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1993KAR1158; 1993(1)KarLJ627

..... is duty bound to see that the authorities functioning within its jurisdiction keep themselves within the bound of rules and regulations and not exceed their authority non act in violation of therules and regulations. rule 3 of the rules in categorical termsprovides that a licence to tap excise trees shall be issued only infavour of ..... 1967 rules and framed 1991 rules, wherein grant of licence for tapping excise trees was confined to the co-operative societies registered under the karnataka co-operative societies act, 1959, the members of which are all tappers.6. on the contrary, it is submitted by sri s.r. nayak, learned government advocate that the appellant ..... trees shall be granted in the state of karnataka except dakshina kannada to any person excepting the co-operative societies registered under the karnataka co-operative societies act, 1959, the members of which are tappers; that this aspect of the matter was also recognised by the department and the excise commissioner had issued a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 2000 (HC)

A. Ramadas Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2000KAR4385; 2001(3)KarLJ292

..... observation made by the hon'ble supreme court, report made by the mahesh hegde committee, section 14 of the karnataka education (prohibition of capitation fee) act, 1984, the collective responsibility for arriving at proper conclusion.15. the file further indicate that as a matter of fact respondent 6 was made chairman. ..... on such scrutiny. but, the members of the committee, have failed to do the same and thereby, they are jointly and severally responsible for the acts of the selection scrutiny committee'.while concluding, the upalokayukta has recommended to initiate disciplinary proceedings against respondent 6 and also directed to debar respondents from taking ..... expected'.the upalokayukta has also observed as under.-'in terms of the provision under section 14 of the karnataka educational institutions (prohibition of capitation fee) act, 1984, the selection scrutiny committee was required to scrutinise all the documents required to be produced by the candidates and was required to take a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 1978 (HC)

Sangappa Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1978CriLJ1367

..... the relevant provisions relating to bail in the old code as well as in the new code, we ultimately hold that the provisions contained in the cr. p.c., 1973 (act ii of 1974) clearly extend the periphery of the powers of the high court to grant bail in a case involving an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life ..... ordern.r. kudoor, j.1. this petition is one under section 439 of the cr. p.c., 1973 (act 2 of 1974) (hereinafter referred to as the 'new code') by the petitioner sangappa who is a-l in sessions case no. 46 of 1977 on the file of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 1983 (HC)

Ashok Kumar Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1985KAR536; 1984(1)KarLJ82

..... detention are these.first, that on 8-1-1982 at about 2 a.m., at davangere bus stand, central excise authorities intercepted the detenu when he alighted from the incoming bus from bombay and found him carrying 53 wrist watches of foreign origin valued at rs. 17,800/.the second incident is stated to have occurred on 9-4-1982 ..... of the mind of the detaining authority and, therefore, there is no genuine subjective satisfaction at all. this may be on account of the fact that the past acts of the detenu are so stale that their susceptibility for prognosis for the future ceases or that the order of detention made after such unexplained delay does not admit of ..... .g. ravi @ h.raju be detained. now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3(l)(iii) of the conservation of foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act. 1974, the government of karnataka hereby direct that the said sri h.g. ravindra @ h.g. ravi @ ravi kumar @ h. raju' be detained and kept in custody in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 1983 (HC)

State of Karnataka Vs. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1984Kant95; 1984(1)KarLJ9

..... statements were gone through and the counsel were heard with regard to . their respective statements.since the time for making and publishing the award as per the arbitration act had expired. the claimants were asked to file an application before the civil judge. bangalore. for extension of time by a months from the date of its ..... ) power corporation limited and the chief engineer. s. v. p. cell. water development organisation. made an application under section 30 read with section 33 of the arbitration act. 190. to declare the award produced into court by the arbitrators as one made without jurisdiction and to set aside the same. according to them. the arbitrators have misconducted ..... . bangalore city. in original suit no. 150 of 197 . on his file. rejecting the applicable made under section 30 mad with section 33 of the arbitration act. 1940 and directing that a decree be passed in terms of the award passed by the arbitrators.2.the karnataka state entered into two agreements dated 21-9-1960 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //