Inchek Tyres Limited And National Rubber Manufacturers Limited Nationalisation Act 1984 Section 6 - Judgment Search Results

B. Mookerjee Vs. State Bank of India and Etc.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1992Cal250,(1992)1CALLT335(HC),[1993]76CompCas292(Cal)

..... no i company having been nationalised by the inchek tyres limited and national rubber manufacturers limited nationalisation act 1984 in terms of s 4 6 of the said act it was only the central ..... industries development and regulation act 1951 and the inchek tyres ltd and national rubber nationalisation act 1984 39 section 18a of the industries development and regulation act 1951 empowers the central .....

Tyre Corporation of India Limited Vs. Debendra Nath Bhattacharjee and ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1998Cal218

..... 1984 on 19th of sept 1985 against inchek tyres limited and national rubber manufacturers limited and thereafter in that execution case the present petitioner tyre corporation of indi a limited was added as sic present corporation after nationalisation of the aforesaid inchek tyre ..... of the act excepting sections 15 to ..... act the provisions of the said act would not be applicable in the instant case 6 .....

Uttar Pradesh Rajya Khanij Vikas Nigam Sangharsh Samiti and ors. Vs. S ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2000)1UPLBEC588

the government has decided to close down bundelkhand vikas nigam limited and transfer the granite lease to the corporation in lalitpur industry will long survive if it is not internationally and nationally competitive international factors e g the world trade organization rules is alleged that in view of the shrinkage in the activities of the respondent corporation and also increasing wage bill because in motor general traders v state of andhra pradesh air 1984 sc 121 today the need of the hour is decontrol take a licence for starting a new industrial undertaking under section 11 of the industries development and regulation act 1951 may the state government true copies of the same are annexures 6 and 7 to the writ petition in these representations a

Ramjas Foundation Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1977Delhi261; 14(1978)DLT45; ILR1977Delhi371

be set apart for or dedicated to those purposes 14 limitation act the suit is well within time he has proved executed a deed of wakf the wakf was created for national education 47 sometime the term wakf has also been used wakf act of 1913 generally known as mussalman wakf validating act of 1913 this act permitted mohammadans to create family settlements does not operate as a bar issue no 7 62 section 92 of the code of civil procedure does not bar commissioner on february 28 1968 issued a notification under s 6 of the land acquisition act pw 8 2 in this

Life Insurance Corporation of India and ors. Vs. S.S. Srivastava and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1987SC1527; [1987(54)FLR750]; JT1987(2)SC529; (1987)IILLJ414SC; 1987(1)SCALE975; 1988Supp(1)SCC1; [1987]3SCR180; 1987(2)LC681(SC)

is true that powers of letters patent bench is not limited to questions of law and that it has the same in which the transferred employees were working prior to the nationalisation of the life insurance business and as in some cases insurers lest they should be thrown out of employment on nationalisation these private companies had no homogenous policy regarding conditions of 49 2 of the act even before clause bb was actually introduced into the act with retrospective effect by act 17 these appeals arise in civil miscellaneous writ no 6849 of 1984 on the file of the high court of allahabad questioning 6 pursuant to the power conferred on it under sub section 2 of section 11 of the act the central government authority may extend the services beyond age 58 and upto 60 years of age the board has also decided that administratively

Ferro Concrete Construction (India) (P) Ltd. Vs. Rajasthan State Elect ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1988(2)WLN419

public auction or to invite tenders at least from the limited class of persons interested in utilising the land for the merely because in pursuance of the so called policy of nationalisation of text book the punjab government had issued a series majority of these private contractors were members of hoshiarpur rosin manufacturers association the contractors for tapping which were given to the merely because in pursuance of the so called policy of nationalisation of text book the punjab government had issued a series standard or norm in any particular case or cases its action was liable to be struck down unless it could be children rules 2007 rule 12 98 juvenile justice act 1986 section 2 h altamas kabir cyriac joseph jj determination as to enclosure to his letter dated 10th june 1987 at page 60 of the paper book that the procedure to obtain licence

M/s. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd., Salem and Another Vs. ...

Court : Chennai

senior factory assistant in tamil nadu co operative milk federation limited and earned rs 18 900 40 per month out of been made to the judgments of the apex court in national insurance co ltd v pushpa slp c no 8058 of sells a piece of any article which he or she manufacturers and if the customer bargains the rate he or she the injury to the proprietary right therefore a cause of action in respect of injury to the property or loss referable dear one can hardly be compensated on monetary terms 10 section 168 of the act uses the word just compensation which in rajesh and ors v rajbit singh and ors 2012 6 scc 421 wherein this court held that the case of

Federation of Railway Officers Association and ors. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2003SC1344; 2003(4)AWC2738(SC); JT2003(5)SC123; (2003)2MLJ190(SC); 2003(3)SCALE251; (2003)4SCC289; [2003]2SCR1085

of interference with policy decision of the government is very limited that the question whether such a decision should have been deserving sections were deprived of the benefit of an important national resources resulting in economic disparities 8 this court held that context an argument was raised that the enactment of bank nationalisation was not in the larger interest of the nation but new zones is violative of section 3 of the railways act 1989 hereinafter referred to as the act as the same strongly contended that though railway reforms committee had recommended in 1984 for formation of new zones the situation has entirely changed of the banking industry are properly utilised for the weaker sections of the people economic regeneration of the nation may be will increase and the india railway average will improve to 6 2 hours from the existing 8 9 hours as regards

itm Trust and Others Vs. Educate India Society

Court : Mumbai

court the learned single judge of this court in poddar tyres ltd v bedrock sales corporation ltd supra has observed thus 174 2010 dlt 279 db 26 american cyanamid v ethicon limited 1975 ac 396 1975 1 all er 504 house of db 20 indian institute of human resource development madras v national institute of human resources development madras 1992 ptc 201 21 sold or of the technology by which the products are manufactured and the users of such products are therefore not likely on 13th august 2003 under the firms and societies registration act 1973 having its head office at villageuparwara tehsil abbhanpur of the case of hiralal prabhudas v ganesh trading company air 1984 bom 218 1984 ptc 155 has observed thus 5 what are not separately registered it is therefore clear that the section itself contemplates that there may be a disclaimer in respect the order of injunction the apex court observed thus 6 thus microchip technology being the base of many of

N. Vishwanath Vs. the State Transport Authority, Bangalore and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2001KAR4944; 2001(6)KarLJ149

of the supreme court in v c k bus service limited v regional transport authority coimbatore and as per the decision permit will have the effect of offending the kolar district nationalisation scheme 13 4 2000 the grant of counter signature was permit will have the effect of offending the kolar district nationalisation scheme 9 the second respondent accepted the said decision by be replaced by two permits under the new motor vehicles act 1988 and this variation of the original permit not covered by the transport authority of andhra pradesh on 16 4 1984 outside the inter state agreement the additional trip granted was specified permit and none else along with the application under section 70 of the new act filed for grant of permit entered into between the state of andhra pradesh and karnataka 6 he had sought for variation of the said permit under