Inalienable - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: inalienable Year: 2007 Page 1 of about 131 results (0.007 seconds)Chanan Singh Vs. Addl. Director, Consolidation of Holdings Punjab and ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-16-2007
Reported in: (2007)4PLR28a
..... law however it was soon realized that ancestral immovable property which ordinarily held to be inalienable amongst jats of punjab by virtue of custom except for necessity no limitation was placed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTilak Raj Madan Lal Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-02-2007
Reported in: (2007)4PLR53; (2008)16VST153(P& H)
..... law however it was soon realized that ancestral immovable property which ordinarily held to be inalienable amongst jats of punjab by virtue of custom except for necessity no limitation was placed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKeshav Parsad Vs. Chandigarh Admn. and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-09-2007
Reported in: (2007)4PLR229
..... law however it was soon realized that ancestral immovable property which ordinarily held to be inalienable amongst jats of punjab by virtue of custom except for necessity no limitation was placed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Haryana Vs. Ram Singh and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-03-2007
Reported in: II(2007)DMC612
..... law however it was soon realized that ancestral immovable property which ordinarily held to be inalienable amongst jats of punjab by virtue of custom except for necessity no limitation was placed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Nahar Exports Ltd.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-02-2007
Reported in: (2007)213CTR(P& H)20; [2008]296ITR419(P& H)
..... law however it was soon realized that ancestral immovable property which ordinarily held to be inalienable amongst jats of punjab by virtue of custom except for necessity no limitation was placed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManohar Lal Sanghi Vs. Jaswant Rai Ahuja
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-13-2007
Reported in: (2007)4PLR153
..... law however it was soon realized that ancestral immovable property which ordinarily held to be inalienable amongst jats of punjab by virtue of custom except for necessity no limitation was placed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVarinderjit Singh Vs. Tajinder Singh and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-06-2007
Reported in: 2008ACJ1667; (2007)4PLR142
..... law however it was soon realized that ancestral immovable property which ordinarily held to be inalienable amongst jats of punjab by virtue of custom except for necessity no limitation was placed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBharat Bhushan Vs. Ram Lal
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-03-2007
Reported in: AIR2008P& H6; (2007)4PLR112
..... law however it was soon realized that ancestral immovable property which ordinarily held to be inalienable amongst jats of punjab by virtue of custom except for necessity no limitation was placed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSurta Vs. Kailash Chand and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-01-2007
Reported in: (2007)4PLR123
..... law however it was soon realized that ancestral immovable property which ordinarily held to be inalienable amongst jats of punjab by virtue of custom except for necessity no limitation was placed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBiru Vs. Nanhi
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-14-2007
Reported in: (2007)4PLR326
..... law however it was soon realized that ancestral immovable property which ordinarily held to be inalienable amongst jats of punjab by virtue of custom except for necessity no limitation was placed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial