Imputer - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: imputer Year: 1998 Page 1 of about 184 results (0.006 seconds)Collector of Central Excise Vs. LupIn Laboratories
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-1998
Reported in: (1999)(63)ECC564
1 the classification of the product 7 adca 7 amino de acetoxy cephalasporanic acid manufactured by m s lupin laboratories...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGour Chandra Pradhan Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: May-05-1998
Reported in: AIR1998Ori198; 1998(II)OLR179
r k patra j 1 the petitioner who is one of the elected members of the ganjam zilla parishad has...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTindrox Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-1998
Reported in: (1998)(60)ECC646
1 the classification of the product described as indrox 985 p 12 which is a dye penetrant to detect cracks...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLewis Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-09-1998
lewis v united states 523 u s 155 1998 october term 1997 syllabus lewis v united states certiorari to the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTata Engineering and Locomotive Company Ltd. and Etc. Vs. State of Bih ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jul-03-1998
b p singh j 1 in this hutch of writ petitions the legal issues being common the writ petitions have...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBombay Environmental Action Group and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-04-1998
Reported in: 1999(1)BomCR455
orderp s patankar j 1 all these three petitions under article 226 of the constitution of india can be disposed...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Maharashtra Vs. Shri R.A. Chandawarkar and Other
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-18-1998
Reported in: 1999(5)BomCR519; 1999BomCR(Cri)519; (1999)3BOMLR394; 1999CriLJ4449; 1999(2)MhLj650
orders radhakrishnan j 1 heard the learned counsel mr d s mhaispurkar the learned a p p for the v...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNaganna (Deceased) by L.Rs and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Other ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-29-1998
Reported in: ILR1998KAR3503; 1998(5)KarLJ658
order1 since the facts involved in all these petitions and also the contentions raised are fairly similar and identical they...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-18-1998
Reported in: 1998IIIAD(SC)308; AIR1998SC1608; [1998]92CompCas373(SC); (1998)3GLR2012; JT1998(2)SC536; 1998(2)SCALE373; (1998)4SCC387; [1998]2SCR339
..... must depend on the circumstances of an individual case the nature of imputation the need and the opportunity for verification and so on in ..... would come within the ninth exception to section 499 namely that the imputation was in good faith and was for the protection of the ..... and was based on evidence the report leads one to believe the imputations if that be so it cannot be said that the respondents .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.G. Karuppaiah Vs. the Canteen Officer (Aqmq) Hq Karnataka and Goa Su ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-13-1998
Reported in: ILR1998KAR3531
..... the constitution but unless it is established from the order itself that a charge or imputation of misbehaviour or incapacity or that of the officer is losing the benefits already earned .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial