Skip to content


Improved - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: improved Year: 1925 Page 1 of about 104 results (0.016 seconds)
May 29 1925 (PC)

Port Canning and Land Improvement Company Ltd. Vs. Achhiruddi Mollah a ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-29-1925

Reported in: AIR1926Cal693

..... suit out of which this appeal arises was brought by the port canning and land improvement company ltd as landlords to recover from the defendants who were non occupancy raiyats rent ..... been pointed out by this court in the case of the port canning and land improvement company limited v narayan chandra pramanik 22 c w n 558 but it really is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 29 1925 (PC)

The Port Canning and Land Improvement Company Limited Vs. Heirs of Lat ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-29-1925

Reported in: 92Ind.Cas.37

..... suit out of which this appeal arises was brought by the port canning and land improvement company ltd as landlords to recover from the defendants who were non occupancy raiyats rent ..... been pointed out by this court in the case of the port canning and land improvement co ltd v nayan chandra paramanik 45 ind cas 234 22 c w n 558 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 23 1925 (PC)

Secretary of State Vs. Dugappa Bhandary and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-23-1925

Reported in: AIR1926Mad921

..... transfer of property act which says that when the transferee of immovable property makes any improvement on the property believing in good faith that he is absolutely entitled thereto the transferee ..... that they are now equitably precluded from denying the defendant s right to improvements made since 1905 the improvements have been valued by a commissioner a supervisor and a tahsildar and the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 08 1925 (FN)

Lee Vs. Osceola and Little River Road Imp. Dist.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-08-1925

..... riparian owners of the lake lands it was subsequently ascertained before the completion of the improvements that the united states was the owner of these lake lands it was recognized however ..... if taxes may thereafter be assessed against the purchasers for the benefits resulting from such improvements such a liability for the future assessments of taxes would create a serious incumbrance upon .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 11 1925 (PC)

Vasteva Holla and anr. Vs. P. Mahabala Rao

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-11-1925

Reported in: AIR1926Mad405

..... be confirmed in this respect 2 the second point relates to improvements on kurnaki land which have been disallowed by the lower courts ..... present day rates may be due to the fact that the improvements have deteriorated since they were made the point was not raised ..... the property was mortgaged there was also an excessive claim for improvements and also a claim for enhanced revenue in these circumstances i .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 02 1925 (FN)

Pearson Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-02-1925

..... tucker act footnote 1 to recover the value of buildings and improvements erected by the war department on leased premises and removed ..... term of three years the lease provided that all buildings and improvements placed upon the land during said term by the lessee its ..... base hospital homes for nurses and other buildings and placed extensive improvements thereon by a general provision in an act of march 3 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 02 1925 (FN)

Newark Vs. Central R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-02-1925

..... them including draw bridges over navigable waters crossed impliedly consented that in the maintenance and improvement of the railroad a draw bridge over newark bay originally constructed with two tracks might ..... waterfronts on which it has expended large sums for the construction of wharves and other improvements the petition states that the construction of the proposed bridge will cause that city .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 16 1925 (FN)

Old Dominion Land Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-16-1925

..... act of march 8 1922 supra in excluding compensation for such improvements on the land in question is not unconstitutional id 4 whether ..... of the proviso that we have stated excluding from the compensation improvements upon the land or in the vicinity thereof made by the ..... of its location etc with no language that excluded consideration of improvements in the vicinity if any there were but it is said .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 02 1925 (FN)

Mitchell Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-02-1925

..... consequently unable to reestablish themselves elsewhere in their former business for their land appurtenances and improvements the president fixed 76 000 as just compensation for the business he made no allowance ..... obstacles to a recovery the act authorized the taking only of land and appurtenances and improvements attached thereto and it did not declare that compensation should be made for losses .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 19 1925 (FN)

Guardian Savings and Trust Co. Vs. Road Imp. Dist.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-19-1925

..... when state legislation has authorized and confirmed assessments of benefits on lands of a special improvement district and the mortgaging of these taxes as security for bonds to be sold to ..... a suit brought by a trustee for bondholders alleging diversity of citizenship against a road improvement district to foreclose a mortgage covering the assets of the district including assessments for benefits .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //