Skip to content


Impregnable - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: impregnable Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 40 results (0.003 seconds)
Nov 04 2003 (SC)

Saurabh Chaudri and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-04-2003

Reported in: AIR2004SC361; 2003(4)CTC477; [2004(1)JCR140(SC)]; JT2003(8)SC296; (2003)11SCC146; (2004)1UPLBEC279

v n khare c j 1 leave granted in the special leave petition 2 the core question involved in these...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 13 2003 (HC)

Shakuntla Devi Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-13-2003

Reported in: (2004)136PLR852

s s nijjar j 1 we have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the paper book 2...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 26 2003 (SC)

Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan and ors. Vs. Ram Ratan Yadav

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-26-2003

Reported in: AIR2003SC1709; [2003(97)FLR117]; JT2003(2)SC256; (2003)IILLJ523SC; 2003(2)SCALE444; (2003)3SCC437; [2003]2SCR361; 2003(2)SLJ370(SC)

shivaraj v patil j 1 the respondent was selected for the post of physical education teacher an appointment order dated...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 06 2003 (TRI)

Kalpataru Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-06-2003

..... of these provisions it appears to us that fabrics which are coated covered or impregnated only to render them crease proof mothproof unshrinkable or waterproof will not be classifiable ..... generally undertaken to render the fabrics waterproof and whether the processes involved coating covering or impregnation is invariably generally sometimes or rarely visible to the naked eye in the case .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 24 2003 (TRI)

Navinchandra and Co. Vs. the Commissioner of Customs/Acc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-24-2003

Reported in: (2003)(162)ELT287Tri(Mum.)bai

..... the invoice bear qualifications such as 1 3 rd impregnated fully impregnated 1 5 th impregnated etc there was even an instance of import ..... with respect of a extent of impregnation i e fully impregnated 1 3 rd impregnated 1 5 th impregnated etc or 5 the importer all ..... manufacturer supplies scaives with a reference to the extent of impregnation it was observed form the study that the catelogue and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 24 2003 (TRI)

Cargo TarpaulIn Industries Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Feb-24-2003

Reported in: (2003)(154)ELT514TriDel

..... he examined three samples and opined that each of the three samples was treated by impregnation with the preparation of waxy matter and aluminium stearate but interstices between the yarn were ..... the process of inter alia water proofing heading 59 06 applies to textile fabrics otherwise impregnated coated or covered including fabrics covered partially or fully with textile flocks or with preparations .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 30 2003 (HC)

Madura Coats Limited Vs. Central Board of Excise and Customs and Commi ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-30-2003

Reported in: 2004(163)ELT164(Mad)

..... polyvinyl chloride5903 20 with polyurethane5903 90 other this heading covers textile fabrics which have been impregnated coated covered or laminated with plastics e g polyvinyl chloride such products are classified here ..... fall in chapters 50 to 55 58 or 60 examples of such fabrics are those impregnated with substances designed solely to render them crease proof moth proof unshrinkable or waterproof e .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 26 2003 (TRI)

New Nirmal Inds. Pvt. Ltd., P.L. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-26-2003

..... for such manufacture they had filed a classification list for impregnated cloth they had purchased the raw material for the same ..... for both the parties and does not show that the impregnating machinery was installed in the appellant s unit similarly ground ..... has no evidence regarding purchase of raw material manufacture of impregnated fabrics and clearances of the same by the appellants and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 25 2003 (TRI)

Good Year (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-25-2003

Reported in: (2003)(90)ECC151

..... 59 02 clarifies that the heading covers tyre cord fabrics whether or not dipped or impregnated with rubber or plastics he finally mentioned that rubberized and calendered tyre cord fabrics are ..... explanatory notes below heading 59 06 clearly mentions that heading 59 06 covers textile fabrics impregnated coated covered or laminated with rubber including dipped fabrics other than those of heading 59 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 29 2003 (TRI)

M.K. Petro Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-29-2003

Reported in: (2003)(157)ELT98TriDel

..... in the manufacture of such jute products 3 chapter 59 of the central excise covers impregnated coated covered or laminated textile fabrics textile articles of a kind suitable for industrial use ..... heading 59 07 of the tariff applies to textile fabrics otherwise impregnated coated or covered painted canvas being theatrical scenery studio back cloths or the like the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //