Imposing - Judgment Search Results

Apprendi Vs. New Jersey

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in sentencing either by specifying statutorily how a particular factor will affect the sentence imposed or by specifying how a commission should use a particular factor when writing a guideline ..... possible range of punishment at a statutorily prescribed maximum would affect the actual sentence imposed no differently than a sentencing commission s or a sentencing judge s similar determination indeed .....

Johnson Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... drawn into question by the fact that courts could not for violations of probation impose imprisonment followed by probation probation unlike supervised release was an alternative to imprisonment courts did ..... before the amendment adding what is now subsection h permits a trial court to impose further incarceration followed by a period of supervised release after revoking an earlier supervised release .....

Shrey Mercantiles Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Calcutta Municipal Corporatio ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR2000Cal193A

..... is another important point making a substantial difference between taxation and fees tax can be imposed only under specified heads by the state residuary taxation even if otherwise constitutionally permissible is ..... a reasonable nexus such covering of expenses is always permitted fees are therefore easy to impose easy to sustain but those must be fees properly so called and substantially so understood .....

Geier Vs. American Honda Motor Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to motor vehicles or motor vehicle equipment procured for its own use if such requirement imposes a higher standard of performance than that required to comply with the otherwise applicable ..... it has not demonstrated that allowing a commonlaw no airbag claim to go forward would impose an obligation on manufacturers that directly and irreconcilably contradicts any primary objective that the secretary .....

Rama Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 2001CriLJ1474; (2001)3GLR2261

..... with the quantum of punishment of imprisonment that may be imposed but for the offences punishable with imprisonment for a term ..... with reference to the quantum of punishment that might ultimately be imposed on the accused person and must necessarily be examined with ..... would in context signify the maximum punishment that can be imposed for an offence under the relevant penal provision in other .....

Gulf Air Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2000)(71)ECC785

..... indicate such involvement in spite of these observations the penalty is imposed on the ground that the agent of the appellant company ..... or to illegible persons so the grounds on which penalty imposed by the adjudicating authority is not sufficient and satisfactory and ..... identity of these persons penalty under section 112 a is imposed on the appellant holding connivance of ground handling agent at .....

Stenberg Vs. Carhart

Court: US Supreme Court

..... but such a health exception requirement eviscerates casey s undue burden standard and imposes unfettered abortion on demand the exception entirely swallows the rule in effect no regulation of ..... internal quotation marks omitted without question there were women for whom the regulation would impose some additional health risk who would not fall within the medical emergency exception the court .....

R.S. Graphics Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2001)(96)LC323Tri(Chennai)

..... to product and controversial judgements being in existence no penalty is imposable and this contention has been well laid down by the ..... the fera act that law was regarding prohibitions and regulations imposed as regards foreign currency amp exchange it is not a ..... of quasi criminal proceedings and penalty will not be ordinarily imposed unless the party obliged or acted deliberately in defiance of .....

Harris Trust and Sav. Bank Vs. Salomon Smith Barney Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... two nontextual matters 1 that the congressional conference committee rejected language that would have expressly imposed a duty on nonfiduciary parties to 406 a transactions and 2 that the policy ..... mertens situation involving 404 and the instant case involving 406 explaining that neither section expressly imposes a duty on nonfiduciaries finally in the seventh circuit s view congress decision to .....

United States Vs. Locke

Court: US Supreme Court

..... intertanko further contended that if local political subdivisions of every maritime nation were to impose differing regulatory regimes on tanker operations the goal of national governments to develop ..... congressional desire of achieving uniform international standards title ii requires the coast guard to impose national regulations governing the general seaworthiness of tankers and their crews id at .....