Skip to content


Imposed - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: imposed Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.126 seconds)
Jul 03 2003 (TRI)

K. Jagannadha Rao Vs. Government of A.P. and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Decided on: Jul-03-2003

Reported in: (2004)(2)SLJ331CAT

..... while in service was under minor penalty proceedings seeking for declaration that the said punishment imposed on him is arbitrary illegal unwarranted misconceived and in violation of all india services ..... continued thereafter however scopes of enquiry and punishment change after retirement punishment can be imposed only if retired employee is found guilty of grave misconduct or negligence and not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 01 2003 (TRI)

Sundaram Finance Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Jan-01-2003

Reported in: (2003)42SCL521SAT

..... purpose an adjudicating officer was appointed the adjudicating officer after enquiry confirmed the failure and imposed one lakh rupees as monetary penalty on the appellants the order passed by the ..... of the regulation on their part the appellants are questioning the validity of the order imposing the penalty 11 learned representative submitted that the appellants are justifying their failure stating .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 30 2003 (TRI)

Doogar and Associates Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Sep-30-2003

Reported in: (2003)48SCL115SAT

..... the factual position 5 the learned counsel submitted that the adjudicating officer erred in imposing penalty on the ground that the appellant had failed to comply with the requirements ..... a matter directly concerning him cannot be viewed lightly and the adjudicating officer s decision imposing monetary penalty on the appellant cannot be considered as unwarranted 18 learned representative submitted .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 2003 (FN)

McConnell Vs. Federal Election Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-10-2003

..... of corruption of federal candidates and officeholders though 323 f in effect imposes limits on candidate contributions it does not address federal candidate and officeholder contributions yet ..... 201 requires advance disclosure it finds no justification in its subordinating interests and imposes greater burdens than the first amendment permits section 212 another disclosure provision likewise incorporates .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 05 2003 (FN)

Smith Vs. Doe

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-05-2003

..... the act does not subject respondents to an affirmative disability or restraint it imposes no physical restraint and so does not resemble imprisonment the paradigmatic affirmative disability or ..... regulatory conse 104 quences we have upheld against ex post facto challenges laws imposing regulatory burdens on individuals convicted of crimes without any corresponding risk assessment see de .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 22 2003 (FN)

Pharmaceutical Research and Mfrs. of America Vs. Walsh

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-22-2003

..... of the clinical appropriateness of any recommendation that a prior authorization requirement be imposed with respect to a particular prescription drug manufactured by a manufacturer which has not ..... while advancing no medicaid goals under the maine rx program the state shall impose prior authorization requirements in the medicaid program on any nonparticipating drug manufacturer that does .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 29 2003 (TRI)

Sundaram Finance Ltd., Wheels Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of Ind ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Jan-29-2003

Reported in: (2003)3CompLJ145SAT

..... purpose an adjudicating officer was appointed the adjudicating officer after enquiry confirmed the failure and imposed one lakh rupees as monetary penalty on the appellants the order passed by the ..... of the regulation on their part the appellants are questioning the validity of the order imposing the penalty 11 learned representative submitted that the appellants are justifying their failure stating .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 29 2003 (TRI)

ito Vs. Ramnivas Agrawal

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur

Decided on: Dec-29-2003

Reported in: (2004)89TTJ(Nag.)795

..... are to be initiated under section 271d by the assessing officer but any penalty imposable shall be imposed by the joint commissioner it is therefore very clear that if the assessing officer ..... appeal before the commissioner appeals before the commissioner appeals the assessee pleaded that the order imposing the penalty was barred by time the assessee drew the attention of the commissioner appeals .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 11 2003 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Capital Electronics (Gariahat)

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-11-2003

Reported in: (2003)181CTR(Cal)402,[2003]261ITR4(Cal)

..... to get the accounts audited within the stipulated time would attract it initially the liability imposed under section 271b was qualified with the phrase without reasonable cause this indicated somewhat a ..... 273b the reasonable cause has been made a factor preventing the income tax authority from imposing penalty this being a procedural law the liability would not indicate any quasi criminal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 11 2003 (HC)

J.H.V. Sugar Corporation Ltd. Vs. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Sep-11-2003

Reported in: AIR2004All60

..... order dated 9th april 2001 in so far as it imposes four times penalty of the above deficiency in the payment of stamp ..... no reasons were given by the chief controlling revenue authority for imposing four times penalty against the petitioner 7 sri bharat ji ..... any penalty hence the chief controlling revenue authority committed error in imposing the penalty on the petitioner the power of imposition of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //