Importing - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: importing Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 4,681 results (0.029 seconds)Commissioner of Customs (import) Vs. Shri Gangaram P. Kerkar
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-12-2003
..... endorsed by the customs authorities on the passport registration documents at the time of import and by the regional transport authorities when such vehicles are presented for registration in ..... india all such imports except by the physically handicapped persons shall not involve any foreign exchange remittance from .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Customs (import) Vs. Balsara Extrusions Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-12-2003
Reported in: (2004)(93)ECC188
..... gujarat ltd has itself excluded the sums paid by the importer for post importation activities even if an agreement for the supply of ..... by the dy commissioner of customs on appeal by the importer the commissioner appeals accepted the claim and ordered sanction of ..... entitled to issue and allotment of equity shares in the importer company the agreement referred to was agreement between macro traders .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Customs Vs. Sunny Imports Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-25-2003
Reported in: (2003)(90)ECC696
..... enhancement of value resulted in a differential duty liability of rs 1 21 927 the importer waived show cause notice and requested for personal hearing the adjudicating authority under order dated ..... accept this contention for two reasons firstly vikram mohatta was the authorised person of the importer and secondly if vikram mohatta had not been authorised to make such a statement the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.C. (import) Vs. Nav Maharashtra Chakkan Oil Mills
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-31-2003
Reported in: (2004)(92)ECC193
..... we shall fight it out with all possible way but most important important thing is we must know if procap is genuine manufacturer or ..... from seized correspondence that m s aerhem was suggesting that indian importer should accept vitamin c of chinese origin there was also ..... so this is a case where the foreign supplier and the importer failed to prove their assertion 10 that apart the verification report .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDy. Chief Controller of Imports and Exports Vs. Roshanlal Agarwal and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-05-2003
Reported in: AIR2003SC1900; 2003CriLJ1698; 2003(155)ELT216(SC); JT2003(2)SC370; 2003(2)SCALE636; (2003)4SCC139; [2003]2SCR621; 2003(2)LC1029(SC)
..... district of bangaloreincluding the bangalore metropolitan area the schedule mentioned 12acts including the imports and exports control act 1947 income taxact customs act fera and central excise ..... for establishing a special court for trial of economic offences deputy chief controller of imports and exports filing complaints before special court economic offences against respondents under provisions .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGlobal Metals Inc. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (imports) and Spk Impex
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-13-2003
Reported in: 2003(88)ECC579
..... being declared as mixed metal scrap though predominantly copper or brass scrap were being imported they were imported in excess quantity by suppressing in their records as regards the real values and ..... the observation that where bill of entry have not been filed by the importer tribunal cannot hold the importer guilty of the charge of misdeclaration that case arose after the adjudication proceedings .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPasupati Traders Vs. Commissioner of Cus. (import)
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-11-2003
Reported in: (2003)(154)ELT273Tri(Mum.)bai
..... 36 fob as against usd 0 29 cif declared by the importers importers were not able to produce the manufacturer s invoices for the ..... was of 8600 pieces whereas the appellants in one consignment had imported a very substantial quantity of goods and therefore the prices were ..... stock lots 7 the commissioner in his findings said that the importers have not produced the manufacturer s invoice the provision to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNikunj Exim Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Customs (import)
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-01-2003
Reported in: (2003)(90)ECC190
..... intention of the government that bullet proof jackets should not be imported except by the government authority or that it may not ..... of arms given in the arms act 1959 and consequently its import can be considered to be absolutely prohibited under notification no ..... custom authorities that the bullet proof jacket in question was indeed imported for the maharashtra police in the absence of any proof .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAce Kargoways Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Cus. (Sea-imports)
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Sep-05-2003
Reported in: (2004)(91)ECC444
..... they were bonded on information being received that m s goyal ispat ltd were importing identical goods under dfrc scheme the special investigation and intelligence branch of the customs ..... appellants were summoned and statement recorded from their representative statements were also recorded from the import executive of the cha and their clerk the national metallurgical laboratory were requested to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTintelecom Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (import)
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-2003
Reported in: (2004)(92)ECC768
..... in dispute the appellants are engaged in the manufacture and marketing of telecommunication equipment they imported switching systems for demonstration and testing by dot and availed complete exemption from payment ..... only from the date of official closure of the event and that since the imported equipments were still in the possession of the government of india department of telecommunication .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial