Skip to content


Implication - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: implication Year: 1940 Page 1 of about 91 results (0.023 seconds)
Mar 15 1940 (PC)

Secretary of State Vs. Mask and Co.

Court: Privy Council

Decided on: Mar-15-1940

lord thankerton the sole question for determination in this appeal is as to the jurisdiction of the civil courts to...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 25 1940 (FN)

Ethyl Gasoline Corp. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-25-1940

ethyl gasoline corp v united states 309 u s 436 1940 u s supreme court ethyl gasoline corp v united...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 09 1940 (PC)

East Suffolk Rivers Catchment Board Vs. Kent and Another

Court: House of Lords

Decided on: Dec-09-1940

the lord chancellor my lords on 1st december 1936 there was an exceptionally high spring tide on the coast of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 15 1940 (PC)

The Secretary of State Vs. Mask and Co.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-15-1940

Reported in: (1940)42BOMLR767

thankerton j 1 the sole question for determination in this appeal is as to the jurisdiction of the civil courts...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 16 1940 (PC)

Umade Rajaha Raje Damara Kumara Venkatalingama Nayanim Bahadur Varu, R ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-16-1940

Reported in: (1942)2MLJ47

..... view of timma s declarations both expressly and by necessary implication his rights as a mortgagee continued to subsist and in ..... shall be extinguished unless he declares by express words or necessary implication that it shall continue to subsist or such continuance would ..... was extinguished unless he declared by express words or necessary implication that it would continue to subsist if he did so .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 12 1940 (FN)

United States Vs. Stewart

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-12-1940

..... 70 10 exemptions from taxation may not rest upon mere implication and statutory provisions granting exemptions are to be strictly construed ..... of capital gains were concerned but even if a contrary implication were to be assumed it would not override so belatedly ..... which interest was exempted these were overall substitutes therefore the implication is not warranted that the failure of their adoption was .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 12 1940 (PC)

Loke Nath Mukerjee and ors. Vs. Abani Nath Mukherjee and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jul-12-1940

Reported in: AIR1941Cal68

..... the bequest is made either expressly or by necessary implication in the will necessary implication does not mean natural necessity but so strong a ..... to maintain it out of the library fund what is the implication of these provisions the repairs of the library rooms and of ..... wall and the ghat were dedicated either expressly or by necessary implication the mere fact that some steps of the masonry ghat and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 03 1940 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Mujjaffar Sheikh and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-03-1940

Reported in: AIR1941Cal106

..... him in that connexion it was suggested that the witnesses were implicating them because of previous enmity i shall now deal with the ..... against the accused do you think that he has been falsely implicated 6 he uses these very words three times at the end ..... before the jury was not whether the accused were being falsely implicated but whether the prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt that the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 05 1940 (FN)

United States Vs. National Surety Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-05-1940

..... consent was given either by the statutes expressly or by implication or by any appropriate officer of the united states the ..... intention may be evidenced by express statutory language or by implication this was the rule announced in washington v young footnote ..... in the postmaster bond statute petitioner urges that consent by implication is given attention is called to the words legal intendment .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 06 1940 (FN)

United States Vs. Socony-vacuum Oil Co., Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-06-1940

..... conspiracy violating the sherman act embraced at least by clear implication the making of sales at advanced prices to jobbers and ..... buying on the spot markets but also at least by clear implication an understanding to maintain such improvements in mid western prices ..... in sum the conspiracy contemplated and embraced at least by clear implication sales to jobbers and consumers in the mid western area .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //