Skip to content


Implication - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: implication Sorted by: recent Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 1,464 results (0.035 seconds)
Dec 31 2004 (TRI)

Goa Industrial Products, Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-31-2004

Reported in: (2005)(181)ELT222Tri(Mum.)bai

..... the same is the procedural lapse and there is no revenue implication involved this fact has also been accepted by the commissioner that ..... converted the goods on job work basis there is no revenue implication and we do not find any reasons to confirm the ..... that this was a procedural requirement and there being no revenue implication denial of credit to metalloy and confirmation of demand against gip .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 2004 (HC)

V. Lingasamy, S/O. Vairavan Vs. the Secretary to Government, Home Depa ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-31-2004

Reported in: 2005(1)CTC639

and the constitution it is therefore the court s concern implicit in the power to deprive the sentence of his personal

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 30 2004 (TRI)

P. Mahender Reddy Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on: Dec-30-2004

Reported in: (2005)2SOT696(Hyd.)

..... justice but if on the other hand a statutory provision either specifically or by necessary implication justice then the court cannot ignore the mandate of the legislature or the statutory authority .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 29 2004 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Peass Industrial Engg. Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Dec-29-2004

Reported in: (2005)195CTR(Guj)326; [2005]274ITR437(Guj)

..... income returned by the assessee was not the correct income it must follow by necessary implication that the failure to return the total assessed income was not on account of any ..... income returned by the assessee was not the correct income it must follow by necessary implication that the failure to return the total assessed income was not on account of any .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 29 2004 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Mayur Foundation

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Dec-29-2004

Reported in: (2005)194CTR(Guj)197; [2005]274ITR562(Guj)

..... for submission of the notice as prescribed and in absence of any express or clear implication of any delegation to the rule making authority of any power to impose any time .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 29 2004 (HC)

United India Insurance Company Ltd., Branch Officer Vs. Veluchamy and ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-29-2004

Reported in: 2005ACJ1483; 2005(1)CTC38

orderp sathasivam j 1 by consent of both parties the appeal itself is taken up for final disposal united india...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 29 2004 (HC)

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Veluchamy and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-29-2004

Reported in: I(2006)ACC416

p sathasivam j 1 by consent of both parties the appeal itself is taken up for final disposal united india...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 28 2004 (TRI)

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Anoop Kumar [Alongwith Ita No.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

Decided on: Dec-28-2004

Reported in: (2005)94TTJ(Asr.)288

..... income as such additions would be backed by evidence and material on record the only implication would be that the assessee would not be entitled to immunity from penalty and prosecution .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 27 2004 (TRI)

Selection Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Dec-27-2004

Reported in: (2005)(183)ELT273Tri(Bang.)

..... considered to have been defeated on the basis of an alleged admission by him the implication of the statement made by him must be clear and conclusive there should be no .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 27 2004 (TRI)

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Apsara Processors (P) Ltd.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Decided on: Dec-27-2004

Reported in: (2005)92TTJ(Ahd.)645

..... which is in force in the assessment year unless otherwise provided expressly or by necessary implication even a procedural provision cannot in the absence of clear contrary intendment expressed therein be ..... presumption is that the amendment is not retrospective unless provided otherwise expressly or by necessary implication we also find that the hon ble apex court in the case of pyare lal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //