Skip to content


Implicated - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: implicated Sorted by: recent Year: 1982 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.031 seconds)
Dec 31 1982 (HC)

Assistant Collector of Customs, Jamnagar and ors. Vs. Karsan Mohmed Su ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Dec-31-1982

Reported in: 1984(3)ECC211; 1983(13)ELT891(Guj); (1983)2GLR865

..... jurisdiction of the civil court to grant relief may be express provision or by clear implication of the statute be excluded where a statute re enacts a right or liability existing ..... obtaining redress against erroneous exercise of jurisdiction therefore jurisdiction of the civil court is by implication barred save and except in the cases referred to by the supreme court in paragraph .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 1982 (HC)

Chauhan Ranchhodbhai Fatehsinh Vs. Valand Keshavlal Nathalal

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Dec-31-1982

Reported in: (1983)1GLR779

..... jurisdiction therefore was sought to be made out by mr vakil by implication which according to him a necessary implication in the light of the provisions of sections 119 and 121 of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 1982 (HC)

Polavarapu Somarajyam and ors. Vs. Andhra Pradesh Road Transport Corpo ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-31-1982

Reported in: AIR1983AP407

ramaswamy j 1 this civil miscellaneous appeal arises against the order of the motor vehicles accidents claims tribunal district judge...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 30 1982 (TRI)

Yenpeyees Rubber (P.) Ltd. Vs. First Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Decided on: Dec-30-1982

Reported in: (1983)5ITD605(Mad.)

..... the industry firstly that section operates only from 1 4 1981 and therefore by necessary implication accepts the position before that day as otherwise secondly it refers to the amount of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 29 1982 (HC)

Brahmbhatt Ambalal Ashabhai and ors. Vs. Special Secretary Revenue Dep ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Dec-29-1982

Reported in: (1983)2GLR1091

the land to the original owner but that is clearly implicit in the sub section even after the transfer is declared

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 24 1982 (HC)

Rajinder Kumar Sood Vs. the State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-24-1982

Reported in: 1983CriLJ1338

..... 70 rajinder kaur and mohan singh colluded with amrik singh p w and got me implicated in this false case on 23 7 77 all the three aforesaid persons came to ..... no 229 of 1972 d 26 5 1972 punj and har supra even if by implication is taken to be laying down the proposition that chemical test in question carried out .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 24 1982 (HC)

V. Veeramani Vs. Madurai District Cooperative Supply and Marketing Soc ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-24-1982

Reported in: (1983)IILLJ88Mad; (1983)IIMLJ49

..... warranted by it in determination of industrial disputes and justify it on consideration of wider implications of an industrial dispute community of interest and securing and maintenance of industrial peace etc .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 24 1982 (HC)

Andhra Pradesh Rice Bran Solvent Extractors' Association and Anr. Vs. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-24-1982

Reported in: AIR1983AP206

commodities act 1955 constitute a single scheme and what is implicit in sub section 3 is made explicit in sub section

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 23 1982 (HC)

Christian Medical College Vellore Association (by Secretary) Vs. Gover ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-23-1982

Reported in: (1983)IILLJ372Mad

ramaswami j 1 the petitioner in these writ petitions is the christian medical college vellore association which has been registered...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 1982 (HC)

National Assn. of Motion Pictures Exhibitors, Delhi Vs. Union of India ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-20-1982

Reported in: ILR1983Delhi691

..... to doing something which may have the effect of repealing by implication an existing law which power could not be delegated in view ..... in these words section 6 does not either expressly or by implication repeal any of the provisions of pre existing laws neither does ..... supreme it certainly could make a law abrogating or repealing by implication provisions of any pre existing law and no exception could be .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //