Skip to content


Implicated - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: implicated Sorted by: old Year: 1996 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.033 seconds)
Jan 02 1996 (SC)

M.L. Jaggi Vs. Mahanagar Telephones Nigam Ltd. and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-02-1996

Reported in: 1996IAD(SC)454; AIR1996SC2476; JT1996(1)SC215; 1996(0)MPLJ1052; 1996(1)SCALE247; (1996)3SCC119; [1996]1SCR25; 1996(1)LC531(SC)

..... remedy opened to him is one provided under section 7b of the act by necessary implication when the arbitrator decides the dispute under section 7b he is enjoined to give reasons .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 1996 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Dhiraj Kumar and Co.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-03-1996

Reported in: [1997]226ITR443(MP)

a r tiwari j 1 the commissioner of income tax bhopal has filed this application under section 256 2 of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1996 (TRI)

Director-general (i and R) Vs. Bajaj Tempo Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Decided on: Jan-04-1996

..... director general pleaded that if the incentive scheme is target related it is by necessary implication actuated by reason of dealings for the overall incentive to materialise this according to him .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1996 (HC)

Manohari S/O Somji Basod Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-04-1996

Reported in: 1997(1)MPLJ258

..... by means of tooth bite on the persons of kundan and ozha and would falsely implicate the present accused thus there is no reason to disbelieve the said wholly reliable and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1996 (SC)

Reserve Bank of India and Others Vs. Peerless General Finance and Inve ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-04-1996

Reported in: 1996IAD(SC)774; AIR1996SC646; [1996]85CompCas920(SC); JT1996(1)SC8; 1996(1)SCALE13; (1996)1SCC642; [1996]1SCR58

..... legislature enables something to be done it gives power at the same time by necessary implication to do everything which is indispensable for the purpose of carrying out the purpose in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1996 (SC)

Vazir Glass Works Ltd. Vs. Maharashtra General Kamgar Union and Anothe ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-04-1996

Reported in: AIR1996SC1282; JT1996(1)SC129; 1996LabIC1061; (1996)ILLJ962SC; 1996(1)SCALE181; (1996)2SCC118; [1996]1SCR110; (1996)1UPLBEC435

..... application for review was taken up for consideration the state government being alive to serious implication of closure of an industrial undertaking thought it expedient that such question should be gone .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1996 (HC)

R.P. Shukla and ors. Vs. Central Officer Commanding-in-chief, Lucknow ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-04-1996

Reported in: AIR1996MP233

..... the court of enquiry it was denied by the respondents that the petitioners were falsely implicated and it was asserted that the petitioners were given full opportunity of hearing before the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 05 1996 (HC)

Srikanteshwara Vidhya Samste (R) Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-05-1996

Reported in: ILR1996KAR2366; 1996(5)KarLJ629

..... can be taken to be vested in the authority by necessary implication nor it can be so read by the implication in the provision that being the position in my opinion the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 05 1996 (HC)

Dharam Singh Vs. State of H.P.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-05-1996

Reported in: 1997CriLJ2769

..... statement recorded under section 313 cr p c he claimed that he had been falsely implicated in this case he stated that no injuries were found on his person by dr ..... on her forcibly without her consent there could be no reason for this girl to implicate the appellant there is nothing to suggest in the version of the prosecutrix that she .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 08 1996 (HC)

Joginder Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-08-1996

Reported in: 1996CriLJ2737

v k bali j 1 appellants joginder singh jugrant singh and samarath singh who were tried with nirbhai singh since...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //