Skip to content


Implicate - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: implicate Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.031 seconds)
Apr 26 2006 (TRI)

Merit Enterprises Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on: Apr-26-2006

Reported in: (2007)288ITR226(Hyd.)

..... is in force in the assessment year unless otherwise provided expressly or by necessary implication even a procedural provision cannot in the absence of clear contrary intendment expressed therein ..... affecting vested rights is prima facie prospective unless the statute expressly or by necessary implication indicates to the contrary even where it is retrospective in operation the courts should .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 25 2006 (HC)

Sukhdev Singh and anr. Vs. Baldev Kaur and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-25-2006

Reported in: IV(2006)ACC533

..... delay itself is no ground to reject the claim petition if claimants had intention to implicate the respondents then immediately after the accident claim petition could easily be filed but ..... of circumstantial evidence accused can be convicted only point is why respondents were implicated if there was false implication then why respondents kept mum sukhdev singh respondent on oath stated that he .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 07 2006 (HC)

P. Maragathamani Vs. General Manager (in-charge), Bharat Heavy Electri ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-07-2006

Reported in: 2006(1)CTC497; [2007(1)JCR283(Mad)]; (2006)1MLJ480

..... avail of the remedy available under article 226 of the constitution therefore by necessary implication the appropriate competent authority should hear the parties consider their objections and pass the ..... hold as follows civil suit relating to acquisition proceedings is not maintainable and by implication cognizance under section 9 cpc is barred the court cannot issue mandatory injunction against .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 23 2006 (FN)

Central VA. Community College Vs. Katz

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-23-2006

..... to the bankruptcy courts in rem jurisdiction like orders directing turnover of preferential transfers implicate states sovereign immunity from suit the states agreed in the plan of the constitutional ..... to the bankruptcy courts in rem jurisdiction like orders directing turnover of preferential transfers implicate states sovereign immunity from suit the states agreed in the plan of the convention .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 29 2006 (FN)

Hamdan Vs. Rumsfeld

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-29-2006

..... separately but were later joined together and considered simultaneously when the language raising the implication was inserted id at 330 we observed that congress tandem review and approval of ..... 2003 we have repeatedly stated that absent a clearly expressed congressional intention repeals by implication are not favored citation and internal quotation marks omitted moreover the court s conclusion .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 12 2006 (SC)

Aloke Nath Dutta and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-12-2006

Reported in: 2006(13)SCALE467; (2007)1Crimes321; 2007(1)KCCRSN23(SC); (2007)12SCC230

..... to recovery of the dead body or other articles belonging to the deceased do not implicate the other appellants in any manner whatsoever 38 we may assume that other appellants conspired ..... judicial confession made by aloke nath before the prosecution witnesses as noticed hereinbefore does not implicate these appellants only in his judicial confession mrinal dutta has assigned roles to these accused .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 01 2006 (HC)

SudhIn Chandra Barman Vs. State of West Bengal

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-01-2006

Reported in: 2006CriLJ4656

..... and this delay clearly establishes that the accused has been falsely implicated in this case fact of murder of sushil barman is undisputed ..... held responsible for the murder of deceased and the prosecution implicated the accused falsely the accused is entitled to benefit of doubt ..... took place at broad day light and possibility of false implication of accused is impossible and nil as it appears from evidence .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 24 2006 (SC)

Hec Voluntary Retd. Emps. Welfare Soc. and anr. Vs. Heavy Engineering ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-24-2006

Reported in: AIR2006SC1420; [2006(3)JCR211(SC)]; JT2006(3)SC102; (2006)IILLJ245SC; 2006(2)SCALE660; (2006)3SCC708; 2006(3)SLJ162(SC)

..... anr v a p pensioners association and ors air2006sc407 this court categorically held that financial implication is a relevant criteria for the state government to determine as to what benefits can ..... been on the basis of exercises resorted to by the employer as regards the financial implications thereof availability of fund average number of employees opting therefore and other relevant factors only .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 04 2006 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Punjab Financial Corporation

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-04-2006

Reported in: (2007)146PLR842

..... unless he is expressly named or brought in by necessary implication which was accepted by the privy council interpreting statutes viz ..... as well as to state unless it expressly or by necessary implication excepts the state from its operation steers clear of all ..... statute unless it was expressly named or brought in by necessary implication was not accepted as a rule of construction throughout india .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 05 2006 (HC)

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. S. Surya Prakash Reddy and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-05-2006

Reported in: I(2007)ACC361; 2006ACJ2287; 2006(4)ALD530

..... right of appeal was taken away by the appropriate legislature either expressly or by necessary implication an appeal was competent under clause 10 against the judgment of the single judge however ..... so the earliest of the amendments in an enactment which prohibited expressly or by necessary implication the letters patent appeal in relation to the matters arising out of that enactment would .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //