Skip to content


Implicate - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: implicate Sorted by: old Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.123 seconds)
Jan 01 2003 (HC)

Anant Ram Negi Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-01-2003

Reported in: AIR2003HP114

..... according to law is not necessarily a legal process the expression legal process by necessary implications means a process by a court of law therefore this article will apply to seizure .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 2003 (HC)

Satya Narayan Gupta Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jan-02-2003

Reported in: [2003(2)JCR312(Jhr)]

ordertapen sen j 1 heard mr sumeet gadodia learned counsel for the petitioner and mr sarvendra kumar learned j c...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 2003 (HC)

The Employers in Relation to the Management of Dhanbad Nursing Home Vs ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jan-02-2003

Reported in: [2003(97)FLR1147]; [2003(2)JCR313(Jhr)]

ordertapan sen j 1 heard mr ashok kumar sinha learned counsel for the petitioner 2 inspite of valid service of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 2003 (HC)

Sri NaraIn and ors. Vs. State

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-02-2003

Reported in: 2003CriLJ4954

..... concern with the impugned land or the accused sri narain and his brothers he was implicated falsely due to personal enmity the other accused pleaded that plot no 331 is in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 2003 (HC)

GramIn Vidyut Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Vs. Devideen Patel and anr.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-02-2003

Reported in: 2003(2)MPHT58; 2003(3)MPLJ216

..... industrial relations act 1960 shall apply to a society registered under this act by necessary implication application of the act has not been excluded and that therefore the labour court has .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 2003 (HC)

Sibu Ganjhu Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jan-02-2003

Reported in: [2003(2)JCR366(Jhr)]

..... to be innocent and to have committed no offence and that he has been falsely implicated in this case due to enmity 5 the prosecution has in all examined eight witnesses ..... submitted that there is no legal evidence at all on the record to connect or implicate this appellant in the occurrence in question and there is no basis for the learned .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 2003 (HC)

Sankara's College of Education Vs. G. Satyanarayana and Ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-03-2003

Reported in: 2003(2)ALD888; 2003(3)ALT205

..... who was approached by the petitioner was the 3rd respondent he was aware of the implications of the order it was not for nothing that the reduced strength of the petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 2003 (HC)

Jesudoss Vs. Sebasthian (Died),

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-03-2003

Reported in: (2003)1MLJ447

..... gujarat v jaswantal the supreme court has held the expression entrustment carries with it the implication that the person handing over any property or on whose behalf that property is handed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 2003 (HC)

Anant Ram Negi Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-03-2003

Reported in: AIR2004HP1

..... according to law is not necessarily a legal process the expression legal process by necessary implications means a process by a court of law therefore this article will apply to seizure .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 2003 (HC)

Shantilal (Bum Bum) Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-03-2003

Reported in: 2003(3)MPHT326

ordera m sapre j 1 by filing this writ the petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated 12 10 2001...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //