Impartialness - Judgment Search Results

A.K. Subbaiah Vs. B.N. Garudachar

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1987KAR100

..... in exercise of the power the commission must bring to bear an unbiased mind consider impartially the objections raised by the aggrieved party and decide the dispute according to procedure consistent .....

Sheonandan Paswan Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1987SC877; 1987CriLJ793; JT1986(1)SC832; 1986(2)SCALE1099; (1987)1SCC288; [1987]1SCR702

..... of an ordinary party to a controversy but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all and whose interest therefore in .....

Abhinavodhanda Vidya Sankarabharti Swamulavaru Vs. Poonapati Ramayogi ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1986SC1511; 1986(1)SCALE1254; (1986)4SCC8; 1986(2)LC47(SC)

..... common consciousness of mankind as pre eminently necessary to ensure that the law is applied impartially objectively and fairly these twin principles are i audi alteram partem and ii nemo judex .....

Bihar Legal Support Society, Through Its President, New Delhi Vs. Chie ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1987SC38; 1987CriLJ313; 1987(1)Crimes1(SC); 1986(2)SCALE848; (1986)4SCC767; [1987]1SCR295

..... court of wards was different from a private guardian and could be trusted to be impartial the high court was right in leaving the interests of the appellant in charge of .....

Lockhart Vs. Mccree

Court: US Supreme Court

..... individual jurors are to some extent predisposed towards one result or another a constitutionally impartial jury can be constructed only by balancing the various predispositions of the individual jurors ..... previously recognized as violative of the constitution instead mccree argues that his jury lacked impartiality because the absence of witherspoon excludables slanted the jury in favor of conviction .....

Turner Vs. Murray

Court: US Supreme Court

..... right is even more clearly half wrong after recognizing that the constitutional guarantee of an impartial jury entitles a defendant in a capital case involving interracial violence to have prospective jurors ..... effect the court recognizes a presumption that jurors who have sworn to decide the case impartially nevertheless are racially biased such a presumption is flatly contrary to our decisions in .....

Batson Vs. Kentucky

Court: US Supreme Court

..... decision petitioner s question presented involved only the constitutional provisions guaranteeing the defendant an impartial jury and a jury composed of persons representing a fair cross section of the ..... the inapplicability of traditional equal protection analysis to a jury voir dire seeking an impartial jury surely the question rests on generalized stereotypic racial notions that would be condemned .....

Rose Vs. Clark

Court: US Supreme Court

..... evidence and argue in support of his innocence he was tried by an impartial jury supervised by an impartial judge and aside from the malice instruction the jury was clearly instructed that ..... 510 1927 the salient feature these examples share is that effective defense counsel and an impartial judge play central roles in the basic trial process the sixth and fourteenth amendments clearly .....

Chicago Teachers Union Vs. Hudson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... reduction of dues and it does not provide a reasonably prompt decision by an impartial decisionmaker we reiterate that these characteristics are required because the agency shop itself impinges ..... employee has the burden of objection the appropriately justified advance reduction and the prompt impartial decisionmaker are necessary to minimize both the impingement and the burden footnote 22 page .....

Press-enterprise Co. Vs. Superior Ct.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... order to protect the defendant s right to a fair and impartial trial footnote 1 the magistrate granted the unopposed motion finding ..... prior knowledge of the case would disable them from rendering an impartial verdict and even if closure were justified for the hearings ..... order to protect the defendant s right to a fair and impartial trial the magistrate shall exclude from the examination every person .....