Immunized - Judgment Search Results

Gurudev Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2003CriLJ552; RLW2003(1)Raj146; 2002(2)WLC710

sharma j 1 these three appeals one by appellant gurdev singh in representative capacity another by sajjan singh and mangi...

Federal Maritime Comm'n Vs. South Carolina Ports Authority

Court: US Supreme Court

..... argument however reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of the purposes of sovereign immunity while state sovereign immunity serves the important function of shielding state treasuries and thus preserving ..... tribe precludes us from creating a new maritime commerce exception to state sovereign immunity although the federal government undoubtedly possesses an important interest in regulating maritime .....

Hope Vs. Pelzer

Court: US Supreme Court

..... post for punitive purposes violated the eighth amendment nevertheless applying circuit precedent concerning qualified immunity the court stated that the federal law by which the government official s ..... simple obviously not a the court correctly states that respondents are entitled to qualified immunity unless their conduct violated clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a .....

Lapides Vs. Board of Regents of Univ. System of GA.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... presented is limited to the context of state law claims where the state has waived immunity from state court proceedings although absent a federal claim the federal district court might remand ..... individuals whom lapides had sued in their personal capacities argued that the doctrine of qualified immunity barred lapides federal law claims against them and the district court agreed the state while .....

Raygor Vs. Regents of Univ. of Minn.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of the university of minnesota 5 petitioners response acknowledged respondent s potential eleventh amendment immunity from state discrimination claims in federal court but urged the district court to ..... quite different from the question whether congress can entirely abrogate the state s sovereign immunity defense for the court s eleventh amendment jurisprudence concerns the question whether an .....

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. V.K. Gupta and ors.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

Reported in: (2003)86ITD200(All.)

..... under section 4 of the remittances of foreign exchange and investment in foreign exchange bonds immunities and exemptions act 1991 in short special act the assessee deposited the aforesaid amount in ..... transaction the statement of the assessee was recorded however the assessee reiterated that he had immunity not to disclose anything the assessee also claimed that the assessee was entitled for benefit .....

Gulabrai V. Gandhi Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)84ITD370(Mum.)

..... of rs 1 crore which was made voluntarily with the clear understanding and assurance that immunities including immunity from penalty and other proceedings will be granted and no interest levied 7 1 ..... fulfilment of prescribed conditions the assessee had fulfilled those conditions and was therefore entitled to immunity the assessing officer however held otherwise for the reason i that in search cash of .....

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Glamour Restaurant

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)80TTJ(Mum.)763

..... the department agreed at the time of search proceedings itself that immunities will be given to the appellant from penalties and prosecution the ..... of the appellant was a voluntary offer on the agreement of immunity and hence penalty levied may be deleted iii sir shadilal ..... thus department cannot rely upon the statement for addition without giving immunity from penalty under section 271 1 c of the act .....

Beandk; Constr. Co. Vs. Nlrb

Court: US Supreme Court

..... unfettered right to seek court resolution of differences finding that case inapplicable because its immunity standard was established in the antitrust context 517 held the board s standard for ..... 3d at 629 instead the court decided professional real estate investors was inapplicable because its immunity standard had been established in the antitrust context without reference to any standard for .....

Shri P.V. Narasimha Rao Vs. State Through Cbi

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2002CriLJ2401; 97(2002)DLT452; 2002(63)DRJ331

..... that the constitution bench judgment of the supreme court provided immunity from prosecution to alleged bribe takers who voted on 28 ..... 20 the learned additional solicitor general submitted that grant of immunity means that they were not liable for either being punished ..... for the appellant that shri shailender mahto who enjoyed the immunity under article 105 2 of the constitution being a member .....