Identifying - Judgment Search Results

K. Konappa and Bros. Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1981KAR675; [1981]48STC136(Kar)

..... provided under sections 69 70 71 of the evidence act mere identifying the handwriting of the testator and signature of the scribe of ..... signature of the person executing the document is required to be identified and proved through the witnesses the proof of handwriting and or ..... the act on facts held the evidence of dw 3 merely identifying the handwriting and also the signature of his father the scribe .....

T.V. Subbaiah Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1982Kant217; ILR1982KAR443

..... provided under sections 69 70 71 of the evidence act mere identifying the handwriting of the testator and signature of the scribe of ..... signature of the person executing the document is required to be identified and proved through the witnesses the proof of handwriting and or ..... the act on facts held the evidence of dw 3 merely identifying the handwriting and also the signature of his father the scribe .....

Allahabad District Cooperative Limited Vs. Hanuman Dutt Tewari

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1982SC120a; (1981)4SCC431

..... jj attempt to murder accused allegedly took out revolver and fired shot accused was not identified by injured held conviction of accused merely because he is owner of weapon is improper .....

R.K. Khandelwal Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1971SC1673; 1981(3)SCALE1149; (1981)3SCC592; [1982]1SCR283; 1981(13)LC884(SC)

..... held non mention of name in f i r is not material accused moreover was identified by victim in t i parade conviction of accused is proper paediatrics that petition was .....

M.R. Krishnappa Vs. Bhagyalakshmamma and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1982KAR228; 1981(2)KarLJ425

sabhahit j 1 this appeal by the owner of the bus in question original respondent no 1 is directed against...

Metromedia, Inc. Vs. City of San Diego

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the san diego ordinance simply does not implicate this concern although consolidated edison broadly identified regulations based on the subject matter of speech as impermissible content based regulations essential ..... defined classes of signs from the ordinance s scope for example on site signs identifying places of business time and temperature signs commemorative and historic plaques the ordinance .....

Bhagguram and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 1982CriLJ106

..... thanedar neither the police arranged any identification parade to get hindoliya identified by this witness regarding the rest of the accused he has ..... witnesses jag dish prasad surat singh and basantrao were asked to identify the accused in para 3 of his statement he has ..... above even in the court the witnesses for prosecution have not identified the accused persons maybe from fear or for any other .....

Haig Vs. Agee

Court: US Supreme Court

..... cover of cia employees and sources agee and his collaborators have repeatedly and publicly identified individuals and organizations located in foreign countries as undercover cia agents employees or sources ..... on foreign policy or national security considerations relating to an individual the court itself identifies only three occasions over the past 33 years when the secretary has revoked passports .....

Minnick Vs. California Dept. of Corrections

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and division chiefs were to be responsible for developing a plan to correct identifiable deficiencies through specific measurable attainable hiring and promotional goals with target dates in ..... units special interest groups and organizations and community leaders analyzing discrimination complaints to identify problem areas and assist in their resolution and assisting in the development of .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bengal Mills and Steamers Presbyterian ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1983]140ITR586(Cal)

..... the contention of the departmental representative that the beneficiaries of alleged trust were not an identifiable and well defined section of the public but a fluctuating or floating of mass individuals ..... that the section of the community sought to be benefited must be sufficiently definite and identifiable by some common quality of a public and impersonal nature applying the test the tribunal .....