Hypothesis - Judgment Search Results

Sri Rangaswamy @ Ranga (a1) Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

..... further the proved circumstances must be consistent only with the hypothesis of the guilt of the accused and totally inconsistent with ..... upon circumstantial evidence alone it must exclude each and every hypothesis suggested by the accused howsoever extravagant and fanciful it might ..... of the accused can be safely drawn and no other hypothesis against the guilt is possible the criminal conspiracy is an .....

Sri C Govindaraju Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

..... further the proved circumstances must be consistent only with the hypothesis of the guilt of the accused and totally inconsistent with ..... upon circumstantial evidence alone it must exclude each and every hypothesis suggested by the accused howsoever extravagant and fanciful it might ..... of the accused can be safely drawn and no other hypothesis against the guilt is possible the criminal conspiracy is an .....

Ranjit Singh Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1997VAD(Delhi)689; 69(1997)DLT188

..... supreme court recommended a cautious approach in appreciating circumstantial evidence and explained the kind of hypothesis that must be negatived on evidence to secure conviction of the accused in the ..... and not fantastic it was clarified that circumstantial evidence must be inconsistent with every rationale hypothesis of innocence of the accused it is not required to be inconsistent with every .....

Shatrughna Baban Meshram Vs. The State Of Maharashtra

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... themselves constitute a conclusive and consistent chain excluding every other hypothesis except the guilt of the appellant 20 we must ..... other inference except that of his guilt and excludes every hypothesis of his innocence apart from the circumstances brought out ..... series of decisions the circumstances on record rule out any hypothesis of innocence of the appellant the circumstances are clear .....

New Haven Inclusion Cases

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the parties nor the commission had previously postulated the deduction now imposed because the liquidation hypothesis itself had presupposed a lawful abandonment of service 304 f supp at 798 that ..... sense did penn central s contribution represent a payment for assets received on the liquidation hypothesis the commission could rationally have declined to require any payment at all chase manhattan .....

Merck and Co. Vs. Reynolds

Court: US Supreme Court

..... amended the complaint alleged that merck had defrauded investors by promoting the naproxen hypothesis knowing the hypothesis was false it said for example that merck knew at least as early ..... at 340 but it found that merck s promotional campaign selectively present ed that hypothesis without adequately acknowledging another reasonable explanation namely that vioxx may have pro thrombotic i .....

Pershadi Vs. the State

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1955All443; 1955CriLJ1125

..... probable or natural paragraph 32 page 421 where even the possibility of a single other hypothesis remains open proof fails though it suffices for admissibility if the desired conclusion is merely ..... law 1 circumstantial evidence to justify conviction must be inconsistent with any reasonable or rational hypothesis of guilt of the accused 2 when the inference of guilt from the proved incriminating .....

Sri Chandra Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

..... further the proved circumstances must be consistent only with the hypothesis of the guilt of the accused and totally inconsistent with ..... upon circumstantial evidence alone it must exclude each and every hypothesis suggested by the accused howsoever extravagant and fanciful it might ..... of the accused can be safely drawn and no other hypothesis against the guilt is possible the criminal conspiracy is an .....

Manoj Pratap Singh Vs. The State Of Rajasthan

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... conclusive of the guilt of the appellant excluding any other hypothesis per contra the appellant asserted that he was falsely implicated ..... linking the appellant with the crime while ruling out any other hypothesis the high court summed up its findings and conclusion as ..... the facts so established should be consistent only with the hypothesis of the guilt of the accused again the circumstances should .....

Sri Venkatesha Vs. State By S.p.p

Court: Karnataka

..... evidence further the proved circumstances must be consistent only with the hypothesis of the guilt of the accused and totally inconsistent with ..... of the accused and incapable of explanation upon any other reasonable hypothesis than that of his guilt 5 if there be any ..... all the facts so established should be consistent only with the hypothesis of the guilt of the accused again the circumstances should .....