Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.170/2015 (U.I.T., Bhilwara versus Smt.Rekha Gaggad).Date of Order : 12.08.2015 HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.Sandeep Shah for the appellant. Mr.Darshan Jain, for the respondent. Appellant-defendant has preferred this second appeal to assail the impugned judgment and decree dated 24.02.2015 passed by Additional District Judge No.3, Bhilwara (for short, 'learned lower appellate Court').whereby the learned lower appellate Court has affirmed the judgment and decree dated 05.05.2014 passed by Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Division) No.2, Bhilwara (for short, 'learned trial Court').The facts, necessary and germane to the matter, are that appellant published a Notification for open auction in respect of Plot No.S-68, Azad Nagar Scheme. In the auction proceedings, besides other incumbents, respondent- plaintiff also participated and being the highest bidder, her bid was accepted on 05.06.2009. Pursuant to the acceptance of her bid, for a sum of Rs.40,50,000/-, on t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 2007(2)WLN366
Vineet Kothari, J.1. This appeal Under Section 96 of CPC is directed against the judgment and decree dt. 02.03.2007 passed by the learned ADJ No. 4, Jaipur City, Jaipur dismissing the suit filed by the plaintiff Kanhaiya Lal Sharma as barred by principles of res-judicata.2. The litigative history of this long drawn battle, in brief is like this. The plaintiff Kanhaiya Lal in the plaint of the present suit filed for declaration and permanent injunction stated that he was working as cook with late Rao Bhagwat Singh Ji and also did Seva Pooja in his temple and being happy with his service, the said Rao Bhagwat Singh gave a gift of suit property comprising of two rooms on the ground floor and one at first floor constructed thereon and open land near Ghodon Ki Dhani in Jaipur. The said Rao Bhagwat Singh expired on 25.11.1967 and he left behind three wives Smt. Ghanshyam Kanwar, Smt. Sajjan Kanwar and Smt. Subh Deveshwari who filed a partition suit which was decreed upon compromise on 31.05....
Tag this Judgment!