Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : RLW2005(1)Raj498
R.P. Vyas, J.1. No doubt, death is certain, whosoever born in this dreary world, has to leave for heavenly abode, but, equally the sad demise is painful, if it takes place at the early age, without any rhyme or reason, without any fault or misdeed and that too, by their own people/in laws', where she is expected to live safe and secure. A poor young lady, Smt. Pooni, lost her valuable life on December 19, 1996. According to the complainant- party, she was mercilessly killed by Ram Dayal, Mohan Lal and Ramji Lal, whereas, the other part of story is that she has been done to death by their own persons, relatives and complainant party, where she had been residing in a separate room of their house.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated October 31, 2000, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bandikui, district Dausa, in Sessions Case No. 19/2000, convicting and sentencing the accused-appellants Ram Dayal, Mohan Lal and Ramjilal under Section 302/34, IPC, for impris...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4666/2013 Bhanwar Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. Order dt:03. 10/2013 1/7 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4666/2013 Bhanwar Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. DATE OF ORDER :::03. d October, 2013 PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. V.K. Aggarwal, for the petitioner/plaintiff. Mr. H.S. Sidhu ]. Mr. P.R. Mehta ].- for the respective respondents. -- BY THE COURT:1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner/plaintiff, Bhanwar Singh, has filed this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 15.02.2013 (Annex.15) passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Pilibanga, whereby the learned trial court in a suit filed by the petitioner/plaintiff for declaration on the basis of a 'Patta' dated 06.01.1974 issued by the Gram Panchayat- Dheer Desar, allowed the application filed by the private respondents under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for imple...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1986(2)WLN364
Kishan Mal Lodha, J.1. By this appeal, under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949, the appellants State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, Head Office Tilak Marg, Jaipur (for short 'the Bank' here in) and others, question the correctness of the order dated October 18, 1985 of the learned Single Judge of this Court, by which the writ petition filed by the petitioner-respondent was allowed and the order terminating his services (Anx. 1)' dated April 23, 1983 was quashed.2. The petitioner-respondent was employed as a clerk in the Bank from January 11, 1972. He was a permanent employee of the Bank. He worked in Central Accounts Department at Bikaner from January 11, 1972 to February 14, 1982 and, thereafter, at the Jasusar Branch till that order of termination was issued. It appears that a preliminary enquiry was held against the petitioner-respondent and a report was submitted by Shri B.C. Chhabra. The extracts from that report have been submitted by the Bank as Ex. R. 3. The m...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1(1985)ACC466
Guman Mal Lodha, J.1. Urbanisation with auto revolution is not unmixed good. Accidents, death traps and blood baths are a few amongst other evil effects of it. One has to live dangerously. Now the traditional facts.2. At about 9.30 p.m. on 16th July, 1978, a fatal accident was witnessed near Niros Restaurant, Mirza, Ismil Road, Jaipur, Girraj Prasad Agrawal was the unfortunate victim, who died on account of this accident.3. The deceased along with his nephew was coming towards Niros Restaurant on Mirza Ismail Road, one of the busiest place in Jaipur. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation's Bus No. RRG 1957 dashed against the said scooter causing this accident. It was being driven by Mubarak Ali, an employee of the Corporation.4. The deceased was an Electrical Engineer having passed Diploma in it in First Division and was serving as Manager in K.K. Mills, Jaipur, on a salary of Rs. 1800/- per month. He was also partner in M/s. P.J. Textiles and was getting share in profits. At ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1998(3)WLC381; 1997(2)WLN247
B.S. Chauhan, J.1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuing direction to the respondents to transfer the petitioner and his wife to Jodhpur city area in strict compliance with the transfer policy issued by the respondents for the year 1996-97.2. Petitioner and his wife are Teachers Gr. II and had been posted in 1992 and 1994 respectively in the rural area i.e. in villages Khara Bera school. According to the petitioner, the transfer policy issued by the respondents contained in Annex. P/l entitles him and his wife to be transferred to city area. Petitioner has also raised the grievances that a large number of persons, junior to petitioner and his wife have been posted in city area ignoring the claim of the petitioner. The names of such persons have been given in Ground (iii) to the petition, though the said persons had not been impleaded as respondents. Petitioner further contends that not transferring him and his wife to the Jodhpur city area amounts to di...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1993WLN(UC)418
Rajendra Saxena, J.1. Petitioner by means of this writ petition has prayed that by an appropriate writ, order or direction, it be declared that he stands substantially appointed on the post of Drilling Supervisor on and from 31.5.67 and is entitled to be assigned seniority in the cadre of Supervisors. He has sought a direction that he be appointed as Assistant Engineer on and from the date persons, junior to him, have been so appointed and allowed to get all consequential reliefs. In the alternative, he has prayed that the respondents be directed to get his case screened for appointment by way of first recruitment in terms of proviso (c) of Sub-rule (1)(b) of Rule 6 of the Rajasthan Ground Water Subordinate Service Rules, 1973 (hereinafter referred-to as the Rules, 1973) and to assign him seniority by taking him to have been appointed by way of first recruitment as per Rules, 1973 in the cadre of Supervisors and to assign him seniority above all those who were appointed after 31.5.67 i...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 2001(4)WLN393
J.C. Verma, J.1. The petitioner was appointed in the Rajasthan Administrative Service (here-in-after called RAS) on 17.10.1974 vide Annexure-1 as having been selected by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission. He was promoted to the senior scale on urgent temporary basis on 29.2.1979, but later on the recommendations of the selection committee, was put on senior scale vide letter dated 11.10.1984 (Annexure-2) against the quota of 1980 and again promoted to the post of selection scale on urgent temporary basis vide order Annexure-3 dated 7.2.1987. Because of the reason that certain other persons had been promoted to the selection scale regularly vide order dated 6.12.1986, but the petitioner was not considered and, therefore, being aggrieved the petitioner filed an appeal before the Rajasthan Civil Service Appellate Tribunal which appeal was decided on 22.7.1987 and a direction was given to the respondent to convene a meeting of the DPC for promotion of the petitioner to selection scal...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1986(1)WLN325
Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. In this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (here in after to be referred as 'the Code)' the petitioners have assailed the order dated June 3, 1985 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, No. 1, Hanumangarh under Section 311 of the Code, as an abuse of the process of the Court.2. A criminal case was, registered against the three petitioners and one Jagdish (discharged by the trial Court) at Police Station, Hanumangarh, on the basis of the information lodged by Palaram on July 3, 1982. The allegations were that Balwant Singh and Bhagwan Singh armed with 'gandasia' Jaspal Singh armed with 'darant' (sickle) and Jagdish armed with sword attacked him on July 3, 1982 and caused simple and grevious injuries to him with 'gandasi' and after sometime caused injuries with these weapons to his father Hans Raj which resulted in his death. The chargesheet against the three petitioners and one Jagdish was filed in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Hanum...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
S.B.CR. MISC. PETITION NO.1555/2015 Vimal Bhatia vs. State of Rajasthan 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CR. MISC. PETITION NO.1555/2015 Vimal Bhatia vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order :09. 07.2015 PRESENT HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI Mr K.C.Samdariya, for petitioner BY THE COURT: This criminal misc. petition under section 482 CrPC has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved with the order dated 12.02.2015 passed by Sessions Judge, Jaisalmer (for short 'the revisional court' hereinafter) in Cr. Revision Petition No.11/2012, whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner against the order dated 01.12.2011 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaisalmer (for short 'the trial court' hereinafter) in Cr. Case No.10/2010 has been dismissed. The trial court vide order dated 01.12.2011 has ordered for framing charge against the petitioner for the offence S.B.CR. MISC. PETITION NO.1555/2015 Vimal Bhatia vs. State of Rajasthan 2 punishable und...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1998(1)WLN480
B.S. Chauhan, J.1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners for issuing directions to the respondents to grant semi-permanent status and regular pay scale to them on the post of Beldar from the dates of their initial appointment and in the alternative to grant them semi-permanent status after completing two years service from their initial appointment.2. As per the factal-averments made in this petition, the petitioners were appointed as Beldars in 1988 and onwards and their services are governed by the Rajasthan (Public Works Department (B & R) including Garden, Irrigation, Water Works and Ayurved Departments) Work-charge Employee Service Rules, 1964 (hereinafter referred as 'the Rules, 1964'). During the pendency of the writ petition, the respondents had granted the semi-permanent status and the reliefs which are available to the semi-permanent employees as is evident from the orders dated 24.8.1995 (Annexure. Rule 1) and 16.9.1995 (Annexure. Rule 2) to the reply. The g...
Tag this Judgment!