Hostility - Judgment Search Results

Pennsylvania State Police Vs. Suders

Court: US Supreme Court

..... case in its current posture presents genuine issues of material fact concerning suders hostile work environment and constructive discharge claims that court erred in declaring the affirmative ..... subset of title vii constructive discharge claims constructive discharge resulting from sexual harassment or hostile work environment attributable to a supervisor our starting point is the framework ellerth .....

Hamdi Vs. Rumsfeld

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the detaining country must release and repatriate them without delay after the cessation of active hostilities unless they are being lawfully prosecuted or have been lawfully convicted of crimes and are ..... 20 000 united states troops the united states may detain for the duration of these hostilities individuals legitimately determined to be taliban combatants who engaged in an armed conflict against .....

Bhupinder Nath (D) by Lr and anr. Vs. Surasti (D) by Lrs.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR2005P& H222

..... not being paid because they considered themselves as owners that shall be sufficient proof of hostility and shall constitute adverse possession the possession of predecessors in interest of the plaintiff ..... possession was actual adverse exclusive peaceful continuous unbroken open notorious visible distinct unequivocal and hostile under a colour of title or claim of right he must further prove the .....

Hiralal Munda Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2005(2)JCR539(Jhr)]

..... of their evidence in court and hence they have been declared hostile by the prosecution pw 10 dr niranjan minj conducted the post ..... before whom attention of the statements recorded by him of the hostile witnesses were drawn the learned court below relied these evidence and ..... out of them the female witnesses of village saurdih have become hostile only because appellant hira lal munda is also of the same .....

State of M.P. Vs. Munna Alias Narayan

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 2004(3)MPHT539; 2004(3)MPLJ635

..... objection from defence there was no prayer to declare this witness hostile by the prosecution the procedure under section 154 of evidence ..... act was not followed if the witness was declared as hostile then procedure under section 154 of evidence act should have ..... contrary to evidence on record none of the witnesses were declared hostile trial court has not recorded any finding that since witness .....

Anand Sao Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2005CriLJ452

..... murdered by nanhak anand sao appellant as she is a hostile witness and she did not see anyone assaulting and has ..... the deceased have not supported the prosecution case who are either hostile or tendered witnesses or seizure list witness or inquest witness ..... villagers but they have not supported the prosecution case and are hostile witnesses except the seizure list witnesses and inquest witness thus .....

Rasul Vs. Bush

Court: US Supreme Court

..... challenges to the legality of the detention of foreign nationals captured abroad in connection with hostilities and incarcerated at the guantanamo bay naval base cuba i on september 11 2001 agents ..... with the traditional function of habeas corpus perhaps where detainees are taken from a zone of hostilities detention without proceedings or trial would be justified by military necessity for a matter of .....

Sebi Vs. Promoters of Aftek Infosys Ltd.

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... return of investment at the time of investment in aftek safeguarding the promoters from any hostile takeover by granting affordability of price since they are first generation entrepreneurs negotiations at ..... brought about by idbi and promoters were forced to make arrangements to avert possible hostile takeover of company in the best interest of promoters shareholders and the company itself .....

Pradhan S/O Murlidhar Potdar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2005(2)MhLj226

..... prosecutor in the following manner at this stage the learned public prosecutor declared the witness hostile and requested to cross examine the witness considering the evidence of witness coming in examination ..... accused had exhausted his right to cross examine the witness already after declaring the witness hostile the public prosecutor cross examined the witness and the witness did not say anything .....

Radha Mohan Singh and ors. Vs. State

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2005CriLJ167

..... and half hour of the occurrence however the witness was declared hostile by the prosecution and was cross examined 45 ram jee ..... his evidence the high court has accepted the testimony of the hostile witnesses as gospel truth for throwing overboard the prosecution case ..... witness cannot be discarded in toto simply because he was declared hostile a perusal of entire evidence of the witness shows that .....