Court : Karnataka
..... he acquired the drug or cosmetics.-. 24 - nc:2024. khc:35389 crl.p no.8341 of 2018 12. section 20 of the act provides for the state government (and also the central government) by notification in the gazette to appoint such persons as it thinks fit and who possess the prescribed qualifications to be government analysts ..... i. union of india v. ashok kumar & ors., (2021) 12 scc674 and jeewan kumar raut & anr. v. central bureau of investigation, (2009) 7 scc526 the officer was duly notified as an inspector under the act, empowering him to collect the subject drug and cause the same to be tested by a government analyst. further, such inspector was ..... in respect of such drugs or classes of drugs.13. section 21 of the act similarly provides for the central government or the state government to appoint inspectors who possess the prescribed qualifications.14. section 22 of the act deals with the powers of the inspectors so appointed and this section declares that the drugs .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... mutthagi s/o shivappa mutthagi aged about45years residing at managundi dharwad taluk and district 580 007. ... petitioner (by sri nagendra naik r., advocate) and:1. . central bureau of investigation acb, ganganagar bengaluru represented by special public prosecutor high court of karnataka bengaluru 560 001. 2 . state of karnataka represented by its secretary department ..... in general. the concept of fair trial entails familiar triangulation of interests of the accused, the victim and the society and it is the community that acts through the state and prosecuting agencies. interests of society are not to be treated completely with disdain and as persona non grata. courts have always ..... written order stating the material facts of the case and served in the manner provided by section 134, direct any person to abstain from a certain act or to take certain order with respect to certain property in his possession or under his management, if such magistrate considers that such direction is likely .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... mutthagi s/o shivappa mutthagi aged about45years residing at managundi dharwad taluk and district 580 007. ... petitioner (by sri nagendra naik r., advocate) and:1. . central bureau of investigation acb, ganganagar bengaluru represented by special public prosecutor high court of karnataka bengaluru 560 001. 2 . state of karnataka represented by its secretary department ..... in general. the concept of fair trial entails familiar triangulation of interests of the accused, the victim and the society and it is the community that acts through the state and prosecuting agencies. interests of society are not to be treated completely with disdain and as persona non grata. courts have always ..... written order stating the material facts of the case and served in the manner provided by section 134, direct any person to abstain from a certain act or to take certain order with respect to certain property in his possession or under his management, if such magistrate considers that such direction is likely .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... invoking section 319 crpc, is only a device by which the respondent seeks to initiate prosecution against dakshin beyond the period of limitation stipulated under the act.26. no doubt section 142 authorises the court to condone the delay in appropriate cases. we find no reason to condone the delay. the justification ..... unsuccessfully. hence the instant slp.25. the question whether the respondent had sufficient cause for not filing the complaint against dakshin within the period prescribed under the act is not examined by either of the courts below. as rightly pointed out, the application, which is the subject-matter of the instant appeal purportedly filed ..... government or a financial corporation owned or controlled by the central government or the state government, as the case may be, he shall not be liable for prosecution under this chapter. (2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub- section (1), where any offence under this act has been committed by a company and it is proved .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... invoking section 319 crpc, is only a device by which the respondent seeks to initiate prosecution against dakshin beyond the period of limitation stipulated under the act.26. no doubt section 142 authorises the court to condone the delay in appropriate cases. we find no reason to condone the delay. the justification ..... unsuccessfully. hence the instant slp.25. the question whether the respondent had sufficient cause for not filing the complaint against dakshin within the period prescribed under the act is not examined by either of the courts below. as rightly pointed out, the application, which is the subject-matter of the instant appeal purportedly filed ..... government or a financial corporation owned or controlled by the central government or the state government, as the case may be, he shall not be liable for prosecution under this chapter. (2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub- section (1), where any offence under this act has been committed by a company and it is proved .....
Tag this Judgment!