Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: homoeopathy central council act 1973 chapter iia chapter Sorted by: old Court: karnataka Page 63 of about 655 results (0.073 seconds)

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Rishabh Mishra Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... sfio's investigation, are detailed as follows: charges: i) liability for fraudulent conduct of business of a company, liable to be prosecuted u/s542of the companies act, 1956 - recommendation to central government to advise ol for initiating action.-. 15 - nc:2024. khc:14889 wp no.4380 of 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 ..... by any company or any officer thereof except on the complaint in writing of the registrar, a shareholder, or a person authorized by the central court on that behalf.31. section 465 of the act, 2013 deals with the repeal of certain enactments and savings and clause (h) to sub-section (2) states that any prosecution instituted under ..... the state government under section 9(1) of the cr.pc, and the special court under section 435 of the act, 2013 to establish by the central government for providing speedy trial of the offences under this act. therefore, the contention of the sfio irrespective of the quantum of punishment, the court of sessions had the jurisdiction under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Vinod Wadhawani Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... sfio's investigation, are detailed as follows: charges: i) liability for fraudulent conduct of business of a company, liable to be prosecuted u/s542of the companies act, 1956 - recommendation to central government to advise ol for initiating action.-. 15 - nc:2024. khc:14889 wp no.4380 of 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 ..... by any company or any officer thereof except on the complaint in writing of the registrar, a shareholder, or a person authorized by the central court on that behalf.31. section 465 of the act, 2013 deals with the repeal of certain enactments and savings and clause (h) to sub-section (2) states that any prosecution instituted under ..... the state government under section 9(1) of the cr.pc, and the special court under section 435 of the act, 2013 to establish by the central government for providing speedy trial of the offences under this act. therefore, the contention of the sfio irrespective of the quantum of punishment, the court of sessions had the jurisdiction under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Sri Ashok Wadhwa Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... sfio's investigation, are detailed as follows: charges: i) liability for fraudulent conduct of business of a company, liable to be prosecuted u/s542of the companies act, 1956 - recommendation to central government to advise ol for initiating action.-. 15 - nc:2024. khc:14889 wp no.4380 of 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 ..... by any company or any officer thereof except on the complaint in writing of the registrar, a shareholder, or a person authorized by the central court on that behalf.31. section 465 of the act, 2013 deals with the repeal of certain enactments and savings and clause (h) to sub-section (2) states that any prosecution instituted under ..... the state government under section 9(1) of the cr.pc, and the special court under section 435 of the act, 2013 to establish by the central government for providing speedy trial of the offences under this act. therefore, the contention of the sfio irrespective of the quantum of punishment, the court of sessions had the jurisdiction under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Mr Sujal Shah Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... sfio's investigation, are detailed as follows: charges: i) liability for fraudulent conduct of business of a company, liable to be prosecuted u/s542of the companies act, 1956 - recommendation to central government to advise ol for initiating action.-. 15 - nc:2024. khc:14889 wp no.4380 of 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 ..... by any company or any officer thereof except on the complaint in writing of the registrar, a shareholder, or a person authorized by the central court on that behalf.31. section 465 of the act, 2013 deals with the repeal of certain enactments and savings and clause (h) to sub-section (2) states that any prosecution instituted under ..... the state government under section 9(1) of the cr.pc, and the special court under section 435 of the act, 2013 to establish by the central government for providing speedy trial of the offences under this act. therefore, the contention of the sfio irrespective of the quantum of punishment, the court of sessions had the jurisdiction under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Ambit Private Limited Vs. The Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... sfio's investigation, are detailed as follows: charges: i) liability for fraudulent conduct of business of a company, liable to be prosecuted u/s542of the companies act, 1956 - recommendation to central government to advise ol for initiating action.-. 15 - nc:2024. khc:14889 wp no.4380 of 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 ..... by any company or any officer thereof except on the complaint in writing of the registrar, a shareholder, or a person authorized by the central court on that behalf.31. section 465 of the act, 2013 deals with the repeal of certain enactments and savings and clause (h) to sub-section (2) states that any prosecution instituted under ..... the state government under section 9(1) of the cr.pc, and the special court under section 435 of the act, 2013 to establish by the central government for providing speedy trial of the offences under this act. therefore, the contention of the sfio irrespective of the quantum of punishment, the court of sessions had the jurisdiction under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Captain G R Gopinath Vs. Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... sfio's investigation, are detailed as follows: charges: i) liability for fraudulent conduct of business of a company, liable to be prosecuted u/s542of the companies act, 1956 - recommendation to central government to advise ol for initiating action.-. 15 - nc:2024. khc:14889 wp no.4380 of 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 ..... by any company or any officer thereof except on the complaint in writing of the registrar, a shareholder, or a person authorized by the central court on that behalf.31. section 465 of the act, 2013 deals with the repeal of certain enactments and savings and clause (h) to sub-section (2) states that any prosecution instituted under ..... the state government under section 9(1) of the cr.pc, and the special court under section 435 of the act, 2013 to establish by the central government for providing speedy trial of the offences under this act. therefore, the contention of the sfio irrespective of the quantum of punishment, the court of sessions had the jurisdiction under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Darshana Kadakia Vs. Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... sfio's investigation, are detailed as follows: charges: i) liability for fraudulent conduct of business of a company, liable to be prosecuted u/s542of the companies act, 1956 - recommendation to central government to advise ol for initiating action.-. 15 - nc:2024. khc:14889 wp no.4380 of 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 ..... by any company or any officer thereof except on the complaint in writing of the registrar, a shareholder, or a person authorized by the central court on that behalf.31. section 465 of the act, 2013 deals with the repeal of certain enactments and savings and clause (h) to sub-section (2) states that any prosecution instituted under ..... the state government under section 9(1) of the cr.pc, and the special court under section 435 of the act, 2013 to establish by the central government for providing speedy trial of the offences under this act. therefore, the contention of the sfio irrespective of the quantum of punishment, the court of sessions had the jurisdiction under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2024 (HC)

Mr. Rajesh C Jain Vs. Serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Karnataka

..... sfio's investigation, are detailed as follows: charges: i) liability for fraudulent conduct of business of a company, liable to be prosecuted u/s542of the companies act, 1956 - recommendation to central government to advise ol for initiating action.-. 15 - nc:2024. khc:14889 wp no.4380 of 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 ..... by any company or any officer thereof except on the complaint in writing of the registrar, a shareholder, or a person authorized by the central court on that behalf.31. section 465 of the act, 2013 deals with the repeal of certain enactments and savings and clause (h) to sub-section (2) states that any prosecution instituted under ..... the state government under section 9(1) of the cr.pc, and the special court under section 435 of the act, 2013 to establish by the central government for providing speedy trial of the offences under this act. therefore, the contention of the sfio irrespective of the quantum of punishment, the court of sessions had the jurisdiction under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2024 (HC)

Dr Sharanya Mohan Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... state concerned. 217 11.2. the mci regulations, 2000 are framed by mci in exercise of its powers conferred under section 33 of the indian medical council act, 1956. the indian medical council act, 1956 has been enacted/passed by the union in exercise of powers conferred under list i entry 66. therefore, the main source of power of ..... mci would be from list i entry 66. as per section 33 of the mci act, the council may with the previous sanction of the central government make regulations generally ..... to carry out the purpose of the said act. therefore, in exercise of powers under section 33 of the mci act, the regulations 2000 are made by mci. as observed hereinabove, mci .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2024 (HC)

Dr. Sharanya Mohan Vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Health And Family We ...

Court : Karnataka

..... state concerned. 217 11.2. the mci regulations, 2000 are framed by mci in exercise of its powers conferred under section 33 of the indian medical council act, 1956. the indian medical council act, 1956 has been enacted/passed by the union in exercise of powers conferred under list i entry 66. therefore, the main source of power of ..... mci would be from list i entry 66. as per section 33 of the mci act, the council may with the previous sanction of the central government make regulations generally ..... to carry out the purpose of the said act. therefore, in exercise of powers under section 33 of the mci act, the regulations 2000 are made by mci. as observed hereinabove, mci .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //