Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: homoeopathy central council act 1973 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: recent Page 9 of about 2,155 results (0.197 seconds)

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Smt Monthine Pinto

Court : Karnataka

..... in exercise of the powers conferred by clause-(c) of the section 3 and section 7 of acquisition act, 1894 (central act- 1/1984) as amended and extended from time to time by the land acquisition (karnataka and amendment) act 1961 (karnataka act 17 of 1961) read with section 36 of the bangalore development authority ac, 1976, the additional ..... in fact, in this regard the learned counsels for the petitioners relied on a judgment of this court in the case of b.r. baliga v. town municipal council, udupi, d.k. [1995 (4) kar. l.j.408.]. where it has been held that when land which is acquired is an agricultural land acquired for ..... that some temporary structure or a dilapidated structure existed therein. a development authority should either provide orderly development or should stay away from development. it cannot act like unscrupulous 256 private developers/colonisers attempting development of small bits of land with only profit motive. when we refer to private developers/colonisers by way of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. The State Of Karantaka

Court : Karnataka

..... in exercise of the powers conferred by clause-(c) of the section 3 and section 7 of acquisition act, 1894 (central act- 1/1984) as amended and extended from time to time by the land acquisition (karnataka and amendment) act 1961 (karnataka act 17 of 1961) read with section 36 of the bangalore development authority ac, 1976, the additional ..... in fact, in this regard the learned counsels for the petitioners relied on a judgment of this court in the case of b.r. baliga v. town municipal council, udupi, d.k. [1995 (4) kar. l.j.408.]. where it has been held that when land which is acquired is an agricultural land acquired for ..... that some temporary structure or a dilapidated structure existed therein. a development authority should either provide orderly development or should stay away from development. it cannot act like unscrupulous 256 private developers/colonisers attempting development of small bits of land with only profit motive. when we refer to private developers/colonisers by way of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Sri Shantharaju

Court : Karnataka

..... in exercise of the powers conferred by clause-(c) of the section 3 and section 7 of acquisition act, 1894 (central act- 1/1984) as amended and extended from time to time by the land acquisition (karnataka and amendment) act 1961 (karnataka act 17 of 1961) read with section 36 of the bangalore development authority ac, 1976, the additional ..... in fact, in this regard the learned counsels for the petitioners relied on a judgment of this court in the case of b.r. baliga v. town municipal council, udupi, d.k. [1995 (4) kar. l.j.408.]. where it has been held that when land which is acquired is an agricultural land acquired for ..... that some temporary structure or a dilapidated structure existed therein. a development authority should either provide orderly development or should stay away from development. it cannot act like unscrupulous 256 private developers/colonisers attempting development of small bits of land with only profit motive. when we refer to private developers/colonisers by way of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bengaluru Development Authority Vs. Sri Lakshmana

Court : Karnataka

..... in exercise of the powers conferred by clause-(c) of the section 3 and section 7 of acquisition act, 1894 (central act- 1/1984) as amended and extended from time to time by the land acquisition (karnataka and amendment) act 1961 (karnataka act 17 of 1961) read with section 36 of the bangalore development authority ac, 1976, the additional ..... in fact, in this regard the learned counsels for the petitioners relied on a judgment of this court in the case of b.r. baliga v. town municipal council, udupi, d.k. [1995 (4) kar. l.j.408.]. where it has been held that when land which is acquired is an agricultural land acquired for ..... that some temporary structure or a dilapidated structure existed therein. a development authority should either provide orderly development or should stay away from development. it cannot act like unscrupulous 256 private developers/colonisers attempting development of small bits of land with only profit motive. when we refer to private developers/colonisers by way of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

The Commissioner Vs. The Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... in exercise of the powers conferred by clause-(c) of the section 3 and section 7 of acquisition act, 1894 (central act- 1/1984) as amended and extended from time to time by the land acquisition (karnataka and amendment) act 1961 (karnataka act 17 of 1961) read with section 36 of the bangalore development authority ac, 1976, the additional ..... in fact, in this regard the learned counsels for the petitioners relied on a judgment of this court in the case of b.r. baliga v. town municipal council, udupi, d.k. [1995 (4) kar. l.j.408.]. where it has been held that when land which is acquired is an agricultural land acquired for ..... that some temporary structure or a dilapidated structure existed therein. a development authority should either provide orderly development or should stay away from development. it cannot act like unscrupulous 256 private developers/colonisers attempting development of small bits of land with only profit motive. when we refer to private developers/colonisers by way of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Smt. S.n. Manjula

Court : Karnataka

..... in exercise of the powers conferred by clause-(c) of the section 3 and section 7 of acquisition act, 1894 (central act- 1/1984) as amended and extended from time to time by the land acquisition (karnataka and amendment) act 1961 (karnataka act 17 of 1961) read with section 36 of the bangalore development authority ac, 1976, the additional ..... in fact, in this regard the learned counsels for the petitioners relied on a judgment of this court in the case of b.r. baliga v. town municipal council, udupi, d.k. [1995 (4) kar. l.j.408.]. where it has been held that when land which is acquired is an agricultural land acquired for ..... that some temporary structure or a dilapidated structure existed therein. a development authority should either provide orderly development or should stay away from development. it cannot act like unscrupulous 256 private developers/colonisers attempting development of small bits of land with only profit motive. when we refer to private developers/colonisers by way of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Smt. Sathi Chitra

Court : Karnataka

..... in exercise of the powers conferred by clause-(c) of the section 3 and section 7 of acquisition act, 1894 (central act- 1/1984) as amended and extended from time to time by the land acquisition (karnataka and amendment) act 1961 (karnataka act 17 of 1961) read with section 36 of the bangalore development authority ac, 1976, the additional ..... in fact, in this regard the learned counsels for the petitioners relied on a judgment of this court in the case of b.r. baliga v. town municipal council, udupi, d.k. [1995 (4) kar. l.j.408.]. where it has been held that when land which is acquired is an agricultural land acquired for ..... that some temporary structure or a dilapidated structure existed therein. a development authority should either provide orderly development or should stay away from development. it cannot act like unscrupulous 256 private developers/colonisers attempting development of small bits of land with only profit motive. when we refer to private developers/colonisers by way of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Smt Achamma Ammini Joseph

Court : Karnataka

..... in exercise of the powers conferred by clause-(c) of the section 3 and section 7 of acquisition act, 1894 (central act- 1/1984) as amended and extended from time to time by the land acquisition (karnataka and amendment) act 1961 (karnataka act 17 of 1961) read with section 36 of the bangalore development authority ac, 1976, the additional ..... in fact, in this regard the learned counsels for the petitioners relied on a judgment of this court in the case of b.r. baliga v. town municipal council, udupi, d.k. [1995 (4) kar. l.j.408.]. where it has been held that when land which is acquired is an agricultural land acquired for ..... that some temporary structure or a dilapidated structure existed therein. a development authority should either provide orderly development or should stay away from development. it cannot act like unscrupulous 256 private developers/colonisers attempting development of small bits of land with only profit motive. when we refer to private developers/colonisers by way of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. B.r. Chandrashekaraiah

Court : Karnataka

..... in exercise of the powers conferred by clause-(c) of the section 3 and section 7 of acquisition act, 1894 (central act- 1/1984) as amended and extended from time to time by the land acquisition (karnataka and amendment) act 1961 (karnataka act 17 of 1961) read with section 36 of the bangalore development authority ac, 1976, the additional ..... in fact, in this regard the learned counsels for the petitioners relied on a judgment of this court in the case of b.r. baliga v. town municipal council, udupi, d.k. [1995 (4) kar. l.j.408.]. where it has been held that when land which is acquired is an agricultural land acquired for ..... that some temporary structure or a dilapidated structure existed therein. a development authority should either provide orderly development or should stay away from development. it cannot act like unscrupulous 256 private developers/colonisers attempting development of small bits of land with only profit motive. when we refer to private developers/colonisers by way of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Smt Nirmala

Court : Karnataka

..... in exercise of the powers conferred by clause-(c) of the section 3 and section 7 of acquisition act, 1894 (central act- 1/1984) as amended and extended from time to time by the land acquisition (karnataka and amendment) act 1961 (karnataka act 17 of 1961) read with section 36 of the bangalore development authority ac, 1976, the additional ..... in fact, in this regard the learned counsels for the petitioners relied on a judgment of this court in the case of b.r. baliga v. town municipal council, udupi, d.k. [1995 (4) kar. l.j.408.]. where it has been held that when land which is acquired is an agricultural land acquired for ..... that some temporary structure or a dilapidated structure existed therein. a development authority should either provide orderly development or should stay away from development. it cannot act like unscrupulous 256 private developers/colonisers attempting development of small bits of land with only profit motive. when we refer to private developers/colonisers by way of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //