Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: homoeopathy central council act 1973 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: recent Page 14 of about 2,155 results (0.126 seconds)

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Sri A Kannaiah,

Court : Karnataka

..... in exercise of the powers conferred by clause-(c) of the section 3 and section 7 of acquisition act, 1894 (central act- 1/1984) as amended and extended from time to time by the land acquisition (karnataka and amendment) act 1961 (karnataka act 17 of 1961) read with section 36 of the bangalore development authority ac, 1976, the additional ..... in fact, in this regard the learned counsels for the petitioners relied on a judgment of this court in the case of b.r. baliga v. town municipal council, udupi, d.k. [1995 (4) kar. l.j.408.]. where it has been held that when land which is acquired is an agricultural land acquired for ..... that some temporary structure or a dilapidated structure existed therein. a development authority should either provide orderly development or should stay away from development. it cannot act like unscrupulous 256 private developers/colonisers attempting development of small bits of land with only profit motive. when we refer to private developers/colonisers by way of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Smt Muniyamma

Court : Karnataka

..... in exercise of the powers conferred by clause-(c) of the section 3 and section 7 of acquisition act, 1894 (central act- 1/1984) as amended and extended from time to time by the land acquisition (karnataka and amendment) act 1961 (karnataka act 17 of 1961) read with section 36 of the bangalore development authority ac, 1976, the additional ..... in fact, in this regard the learned counsels for the petitioners relied on a judgment of this court in the case of b.r. baliga v. town municipal council, udupi, d.k. [1995 (4) kar. l.j.408.]. where it has been held that when land which is acquired is an agricultural land acquired for ..... that some temporary structure or a dilapidated structure existed therein. a development authority should either provide orderly development or should stay away from development. it cannot act like unscrupulous 256 private developers/colonisers attempting development of small bits of land with only profit motive. when we refer to private developers/colonisers by way of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Sri. Purushothama

Court : Karnataka

..... in exercise of the powers conferred by clause-(c) of the section 3 and section 7 of acquisition act, 1894 (central act- 1/1984) as amended and extended from time to time by the land acquisition (karnataka and amendment) act 1961 (karnataka act 17 of 1961) read with section 36 of the bangalore development authority ac, 1976, the additional ..... in fact, in this regard the learned counsels for the petitioners relied on a judgment of this court in the case of b.r. baliga v. town municipal council, udupi, d.k. [1995 (4) kar. l.j.408.]. where it has been held that when land which is acquired is an agricultural land acquired for ..... that some temporary structure or a dilapidated structure existed therein. a development authority should either provide orderly development or should stay away from development. it cannot act like unscrupulous 256 private developers/colonisers attempting development of small bits of land with only profit motive. when we refer to private developers/colonisers by way of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Sri. Puttappa,

Court : Karnataka

..... in exercise of the powers conferred by clause-(c) of the section 3 and section 7 of acquisition act, 1894 (central act- 1/1984) as amended and extended from time to time by the land acquisition (karnataka and amendment) act 1961 (karnataka act 17 of 1961) read with section 36 of the bangalore development authority ac, 1976, the additional ..... in fact, in this regard the learned counsels for the petitioners relied on a judgment of this court in the case of b.r. baliga v. town municipal council, udupi, d.k. [1995 (4) kar. l.j.408.]. where it has been held that when land which is acquired is an agricultural land acquired for ..... that some temporary structure or a dilapidated structure existed therein. a development authority should either provide orderly development or should stay away from development. it cannot act like unscrupulous 256 private developers/colonisers attempting development of small bits of land with only profit motive. when we refer to private developers/colonisers by way of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2024 (HC)

Bangalore Development Authority Vs. Sri S Sudhakar

Court : Karnataka

..... in exercise of the powers conferred by clause-(c) of the section 3 and section 7 of acquisition act, 1894 (central act- 1/1984) as amended and extended from time to time by the land acquisition (karnataka and amendment) act 1961 (karnataka act 17 of 1961) read with section 36 of the bangalore development authority ac, 1976, the additional ..... in fact, in this regard the learned counsels for the petitioners relied on a judgment of this court in the case of b.r. baliga v. town municipal council, udupi, d.k. [1995 (4) kar. l.j.408.]. where it has been held that when land which is acquired is an agricultural land acquired for ..... that some temporary structure or a dilapidated structure existed therein. a development authority should either provide orderly development or should stay away from development. it cannot act like unscrupulous 256 private developers/colonisers attempting development of small bits of land with only profit motive. when we refer to private developers/colonisers by way of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 2023 (SC)

In Re Interplay Between Arbitration Agreements Under The Arbitration A ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... pending in many cases in different high courts and certain doubts have arisen with regard to the interpretation to the provisions of section 28-a of the act. in central board of dawoodi bohra community v. state of maharashtra,17 a constitution bench of this court held that the judicial course adopted in hansoli devi (supra) ..... model law: protector of the arbitral process?. (2021) 38(2) journal of international arbitration 127-146. 69 food corporation of india v. indian council of arbitration, (2003) 6 scc56447 part e act. in doing so, the legislature did not altogether exclude the role of courts or judicial authorities in arbitral proceedings, but limited it to circumstances ..... expounds the meaning of the words for any purpose used in section 35 of the stamp act. these words are to be given natural meaning and effect. they would include collateral purpose, as was held in the decision of the privy council in ram rattan v. parma nand15. distinction was drawn between non-effect of registration .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2023 (SC)

In Re Article 370 Of The Constitution

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... a consequence, entry 82 of the union list303 was applied with modifications. as a consequence of co269 the jammu and kashmir goods and services tax act 2017, the central goods and services tax (extension to jammu and kashmir) ordinance 2017 and the integrated and goods and services tax304 (extension to jammu and kashmir) ..... on the federating states in their own sphere furthers representative democracy. the electorate elects their representatives to the state legislature. the state government (through the council of ministers) is accountable to the legislative assembly, which in turn is accountable to the citizenry. in this manner, the existence of the states breathes ..... proviso to article 370(1)(d). this is notwithstanding the fact that the concurrence so obtained from the governor was when he was acting in place of the council of ministers. in any case, concurrence constitutes a higher threshold than recommendation and the framers consciously insisted on a lower threshold of agreement .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 2023 (HC)

Nitin Shambhukumar Kasliwal Vs. Debt Recovery Tribunal-1

Court : Karnataka

..... of the passport (which in substance amounts to impounding it) from october 2006. in our opinion, this was clearly illegal. under section 10-a of the act retention by the central government can only be for four weeks. thereafter it can only be retained by an order of the passport authority under section 10(3).18. in our ..... there is no order of the passport authorities under section 10(3)(e) or by the central government or any designated officer under section 10-a of the act to impound the passport by the respondent exercising the powers vested under the act.13. the learned additional solicitor general has submitted that the police has power to seize a ..... travel documents. section 10-a of the act which provides for an order to suspend with immediate effect any passport or travel document; such other appropriate order which may have the effect of rendering any passport or travel document invalid, for a period not exceeding four weeks, if the central government or any designated officer on its .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 17 2023 (SC)

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... states that no person or establishment shall discriminate against a transgender person. establishment is defined as any body or authority established by or under a central act or a state act or an authority or body owned or controlled or aided by the government or a local authority or a government company233 and includes a department ..... obligations of various parties with respect to their right to education, social security, and health.230 it also creates a national council for transgender persons.231 a challenge to the constitutional validity of the transgender persons act is pending 225 h.r. vasujith ram, 'combatting exclusions through law: rights of transgender people in india', in zoya ..... . oakley [2001]. 1 all er385[hl].. 82 in this context, the court took note of goodes v east sussex county council (2000 [3]. all er603 and southwark london borough council v. mills (1999 [4]. all er449. 83 [2013]. 10 scr25984 [2015]. 10 scr88085 1996 (2) scc4285 0 though necessarily embedded in its own .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 07 2023 (SC)

V. Senthil Balaji Vs. The State Represented By Deputy Director

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... to avoid any possible conflict or confusion. vijay madanlal choudhary (supra):27. 27. the task of the director or an authority authorised by the central government under the 2002 act for the collection of evidence is the intrinsic process of adjudication proceedings. in that, the evidence so collected by the authorities is placed before the ..... confiscation, as a result of which, the proceeds of crime would vest in the central government in terms of section 9 of the 2002 act. in other words, the role of the authorities appointed under chapter viii of the 2002 act is such that they are tasked with dual role of conducting inquiry and collect evidence ..... order. we need to keep in mind that the expanse of the provisions of the 2002 act is of prevention of money- laundering, attachment of proceeds of crime, adjudication and confiscation thereof, including vesting of it in the central government and also setting up of agency and mechanism for coordinating measures for combating money- laundering. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //