Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: hirepurchase repeal act 2005 Sorted by: old Court: uttaranchal Page 1 of about 131 results (0.062 seconds)

State of Uttarakhand Vs. Constable Sashi Shankar Rai

Court : Uttaranchal

..... assessed the evidence on record, found that prosecution failed to prove the charge of offence punishable under section 376 ipc and one punishable under section 3(1)(xii) of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989 against the accused constable sashi shankar rai and, accordingly, acquitted him vide impugned judgment and order dated 18.12.2010. 10. ..... section 207 crpc and, after hearing the parties, framed the charge of offence punishable under section 376 ipc and one punishable under section 3(1)(xii) of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989. ..... a-12) against the accused constable sashi shankar rai for his trial in respect of the offence punishable under section 376 ipc and one punishable under section 3(2) of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989. 6. ..... 749/2006 was registered against the accused constable sashi shankar rai in respect of offence punishable under section 376 ipc and one punishable under section 3(ii) of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989. 4. ..... court has acquitted the accused/respondent constable sashi shankar rai of the charge of offence punishable under section 376 ipc and one punishable under section 3(ii) of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989. 2. .....

Rajeev Barthwal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC71(UHC); (2004)3UPLBEC124

..... on this, petitioner moved an application under section 13a of industrial disputes act, 1947 before the assistant labour commissioner on 19.11.2001. .....

Dalip Singh Kathayat and ors. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2005)2UPLBEC61

rajesh tandon, j.1. heard shri manoj tiwari learned counsel for the petitioner and standing counsel for the respondents.2. by the present writ petition the petitioners have prayed for the issue of a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to sanction the pay scale of rs. 7500-1200/- on the post of sub-deputy inspector of schools/assistant basic education officer and the corresponding higher pay scale to the post of deputy basic education officer on the term identical to as contained in government order dated 20.12.2001.3. brief facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that the petitioner no. 1 was initially appointed as assistant teacher in jagannath madhyamik vidvalaya, chaupata on 1.7.74 and then he was promoted as headmaster, junior high school w.e.f., 1.7.77 and ultimately he was promoted as sub-deputy inspector of schools under 10% quota w.e.f., 6.11.89 and presently he is working in ramnagar, district nainital.4. petitioner no. 2 was initially appointed as assistant teacher in government model school. bhimtal w.e.f., 22.10.1970, subsequently he was promoted as headmaster of government model school, bhimtal w.e.f., 30.5.82 and ultimately he was promoted as sub-deputy inspector of schools under 10% promotion quota w.e.f., 19.11.1987 and presently he is serving as assistant basic education officer in block syaldey.5. petitioner no. 3 was appointed by direct recruitment through commission on the post of sub-deputy inspector of .....

Niaz Mohd. and ors. Vs. Sunder Mani Bhatt and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 3(2005)ACC179

..... briefly stated the facts giving rise to the present appeal are that appellants filed a petition under section 166 pf the motor vehicles act, before the motor accident claims tribunal, tehri garhwal for grant of award of compensation due to the death of smt. .....

Tej Kumari Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 3(2005)ACC55

..... brief facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the appellant petitioner has filed a claim petition under section 110 of motor vehicles act, for grant of compensation on account of death of sri nanhey lal in a motor vehicle accident. .....

Sulochana Devi and ors. Vs. Ist Additional District Judge and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : II(2005)ACC239

..... brief facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the appellants-petitioner have filed a claim petition under section 110 of motor vehicles act, for grant of compensation on account of death of sri mohan lal juyal in a motor vehicle accident, the petitioners have stated that on 14th december, 1984 at about 1.40 p.m. .....

Vijay Kumar Maurya Alias Krishna Kumar Vs. Prescribed Authority/Civil ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC380

..... administrator, howarh municipality while considering scope of the expression 'sufficient cause' within the meaning of section 5 of the act, this court laid down that the said expression should receive a liberal construction so as to advance substantial justice when no negligence or inaction or want of bona fides is imputable to a party.8 ..... thus it becomes plain that the expression 'sufficient cause' within the meaning of section 5 of the act or order xxii, rule 9 of the code or any other similar provision should receive a liberal construction so as to advance substantial justice when no negligence or inaction or want of bona fides is imputable to a party ..... the expression 'sufficient cause' within the meaning of section 5 of the limitation act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'), order xxii, rule 9 of the code of civil procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the code') as well as similar other provisions and the ambit of exercise of powers thereunder have been the subject-matter of consideration before this court ..... this court has held that the words 'sufficient cause' under section 5 of the limitation act should receive a liberal construction so as to advance substantial justice vide shakuntala devi jain v ..... section 5 of the limitation act does not say that such discretion can be exercised only if the delay is within a certain ..... act of 1972, within a period of 2 months thereafter ..... act of 1972, was filed by the respondent praying for the eviction of the petitioner from the shop .....

Rahul Sharma Vs. Dhanesh Gupta

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC511

..... it is settled law that while deciding the revision under section 25 of the small causes courts act, the scope of revisional court under section 25 of the small cause courts act is very limited in view of the judgment of the division bench of the allahabad high court reported in 1981 a.r.c. ..... admittedly, act no. ..... act no. .....

Rajeshwari Kandari (Smt.) Vs. Rent Control and Eviction Officer and an ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC378

..... in that connection it was said:'the corollary thus of declaring the provisions of section 25, bombay general clauses act, applicable to the repeal of the ordinance and of deeming that ordinance an enactment is that wherever the word 'ordinance' occurs in the notification, that word has to be read as an enactment.'7. ..... the ordinance was repealed and replaced by an act which again extended to areas mentioned in the schedule with power under sub-section (3) of section 1 to extend its operation to other areas, this court held that the deemed clause in section 15 of the act read with section 25 of the bombay general clauses act has to be given full effect and the expression 'enactment' in the act will cover the word 'ordinance' occurring in the notification which had been issued. ..... finsbury borough council, lord asquith while dealing with the provisions of the town and country planning act, 1947, observed:'if you are bidden to treat an imaginary state of affairs as real, you must surely, unless prohibited from doing so, also imagine as real the consequences and incidents which, if the putative, state of affairs had in ..... act no. ..... act no. ..... act no. .....

Govind Singh Sijwali Vs. State of Uttaranchal, Through Secretary, Medi ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC77(UHC); (2005)1UPLBEC9

prafulla c. pant, j.1. by means of this writ petition, moved under article 226 of the constitution of india, the petitioner has sought quashing of order dated 30.4.2001 passed by the director general, medical health and family welfare services, whereby the representation of the petitioner has been rejected regarding his claim as to seniority vis-a-vis respondent nos. 4 & 5.2. brief facts of the case, as narrated in the writ petition, are that the petitioner initially joined has services as a ward boy (class iv) in the medical and health department on 26.12.79 against a vacant post under orders of the chief medical officer, almora. the petitioner passed intermediate examination in the year 1980. apart from this petitioner had knowledge of typing work and consequently he was doing practically clerical work under order dated 5.7.1985 (copy annexure-1 of the writ petition) of the deputy chief medical officer, almora. on completion of 5 years of service in class iv category, the petitioner made representation for his promotion to the post of junior clerk in class iii which was duly recommended (copy annexures-3 & 4 to writ petition) by deputy chief medical officer, almora, the chief medical officer, almora also recommended the petitioner's case for promotion. however, respondent no. 4 shri jagdish chandra sati and respondent no. 5 shri dan singh bisht were promoted to class hi and petitioner was allegedly discriminated and left out. it is further alleged in writ petition that .....