Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: hirepurchase repeal act 2005 Court: uttaranchal Page 1 of about 131 results (0.040 seconds)

State of Uttarakhand Vs. Constable Sashi Shankar Rai

Court : Uttaranchal

..... assessed the evidence on record, found that prosecution failed to prove the charge of offence punishable under section 376 ipc and one punishable under section 3(1)(xii) of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989 against the accused constable sashi shankar rai and, accordingly, acquitted him vide impugned judgment and order dated 18.12.2010. 10. ..... section 207 crpc and, after hearing the parties, framed the charge of offence punishable under section 376 ipc and one punishable under section 3(1)(xii) of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989. ..... a-12) against the accused constable sashi shankar rai for his trial in respect of the offence punishable under section 376 ipc and one punishable under section 3(2) of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989. 6. ..... 749/2006 was registered against the accused constable sashi shankar rai in respect of offence punishable under section 376 ipc and one punishable under section 3(ii) of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989. 4. ..... court has acquitted the accused/respondent constable sashi shankar rai of the charge of offence punishable under section 376 ipc and one punishable under section 3(ii) of scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989. 2. .....

Tata Sky Limited Vs. the State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... agency or organization, having its head office situated in any place outside india, includes service provided by its branch office or subsidiary or representative in india or any agent appointed in india or by any person who acts on its behalf in any manner, engaged in the activity of selling of time slots for broadcasting of any programme or obtaining sponsorships for programme or collecting the broadcasting charges or permitting the rights to receive any ..... the satellite might have taken place outside india;and the term 'service provider' shall be construed accordingly;the quantum of service tax under the financial act 2005, on service providers, rendering broadcasting services was sustained at the same rate as in the preceding finance ..... in the finance act, 2005 was given a ..... multisystem operator or any other person on behalf of the said agency or organization, by its branch office or subsidiary or representative in india or any agent appointed in india or by any person who acts on its behalf in any manner;likewise, the term 'broadcasting agency or organization' was again redefined under section 65(16) of the finance act, 2005, which is being reproduced hereunder:65. ..... the finance act, 2005 is being ..... act, 2005 ..... far as the finance act, 2005 is concerned, it re- ..... , including multisystem operator or any other person on behalf of the said agency or organization;the term 'service tax' retained the same definition as was assigned to it by the finance act, 2003 even for the finance act, 2005. .....

Dr. Smt. Pushp Lata Bisht W/O Sri Khimraj Singh Bisht, Assistant Teach ...

Court : Uttaranchal

..... 5 of uttaranchal non governmental education (amendment and repeal) act, 2005 [uttarakhand act no. ..... of 2005 (uttaranchal non governmental education (amendment and repeal) act, 2005).2. ..... intermediate education act, 1921, was repealed also contains analogous provision in its section 40 and the same need not to be reproduced ..... 4 of 2005 and the petitioner shall not claim salary under the payment of salary act, as she is getting the salary for all this period from the committee of management ..... of 2005 passed by the state of uttaranchal which says that the persons who were appointed in the lecturer's grade or trained graduates grade, against a short term vacancy on or after 14th may 1991 and before 6th august 1993 shall be considered for their regularization by the regularization committee, as per the provisions of the act.10. ..... ls gh p;u dj fy;k x;k gs- c fofu;ferhdj.k gsrq p;u lfefr & izr;sd e.my ds fy, ,d p;u lfefr gksxh tks fueufyf[kr gksxh& ,d ml e.my dk e.myh; vij f'k{kk funs'kd& v/;{knks ml e.my dk ofj'bre e.myh; la;qdr f'k{kk funs'kd &lnl; rhu lacaf/kr ftys dk ftyk f'k{kk vf/kdkjh &lnl;- uttaranchal school education act, 2006, whereby u.p. ..... 4 of 2005], reads as under:5+ ewy vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 16nn ds ckn fueu /kkjk j[k nh tk;sxh%& 16&nnnv; vyidkfyd fjfdr;ksa ds izfr fu;qfdr;ksa dk fofu;ferhdj.k& 1 ,sls fdlh v/;kid dks izcu/kra= }kjk eksfyd fu;qfdr nh tk;sxh] tks& d le; le; ij ..... 4 of 2005 and regularization committee was directed to consider the regularization of the petitioner in .....

Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra Vs. State of Uttaranchal and o ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2006Utr49

..... basis it is contended that the appointment of the second respondent as state chief information commissioner and his continuance as state chief information commissioner, are in violation of sub-section (6) of section 15 of the right to information act, 2005 which provides that the state chief information commissioner shall not hold any other office of profit. ..... other hand the petitioner himself has produced annexure-3 notification dated 3-10-05 which shows that the appointment of the second respondent as state chief information commissioner was made by the governor under section 15(3) of the act, hence it cannot be said that the second respondent has not got an order issued by the competent authority appointing him to the office of state chief information commissioner.10. ..... the petitioner has not raised any contention or placed any material to show that the appointment was not made in accordance with the provisions of the act, though the petitioner has contended that the appointment was ill-motivated and that it was made due to undue influence and that there were allegations of corruption and irregularities against the ..... order was issued by the government of uttaranchal in exercise of its power under section 15(3) of the right to information act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the act). ..... rural litigation and entitlement kendra claims to be a society registered under the societies registration act, 1860 and wedded to the empowerment of the rural poor and the protection of environment .....

Uttaranchal Sikh Federation and ors. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : I(2006)ACC306; AIR2006Utr67

..... penalty or fine imposed, any forfeiture, cancellation or any other thing done or any other action taken under the repealed enactments, and in force immediately before such commencement shall, so far as it is not inconsistent with the provisions of this act, be deemed to have been issued, made, granted, done or taken under the corresponding provision of this act.the motor vehicles (protective headgears) rules, 1980 are inconsistent with the provisions of section 129 of the motor ..... 3700 of 1999 reported in air 2005 sc 1386 chandigarh administration v. ..... place unless such driver wears a crash helmet:provided that nothing in this rule shall apply to person professing sikh religion and wears a turban.in exercise of his powers under section 21(1) of the hyderabad city police act, the commissioner of police, hyderabad and secunderbad issued a notification dated 8-7-1986, inter alia, directing that in order to ensure adequate safety of two wheeler riders, wearing of protective helmets is made compulsory for riders of motor cycles ..... high court was, therefore, perfectly justified in rejecting the contention.we derive support from the above judgment of the hon'ble supreme court to hold that the provision contained in section 129 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 requiring every person driving or riding on a motor cycle of any class or description to wear protective headgear, is aimed at doing public good and that such a restriction is in the interest of the gneral public. .....

Eveready Industries India Ltd. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2008)17VST18(NULL)

..... in view of section 80(3) of the vat act read with section 4(2)(f), the petitioner is entitled for grant of exemption on the basis of notification dated december 26, 2000 issued under section 5 of the repealed act since all the notifications issued by the state of uttaranchal which includes notification dated december 20, 2000 before october 1, 2005 shall continued to be enforced after october 1, 2005 and which is admittedly not inconsistent with the provisions ..... or any concession in payment of tax or concession or reduction in rate of tax or any rebate or reimbursement in respect of any sale or purchase of any goods granted under any provisions of the repealed act or, as the case may be, the repealed ordinance or rules made or notifications issued thereunder, shall not be admissible in respect of purchase or sale of any goods on or after the date of commencement of this ..... uttaranchal, as referred to above, whereby rebate on tax was available to the petitioners and as per provision of sub-section (3) of section 80 of the vat act it has been provided that the notifications under the repealed act/ordinance continuing to be in force on the day immediately before the date of commencement of this act shall continue to be in force on or after such date in so far as they are not inconsistent with the provisions of this ..... act has been repealed by the vat act with effect from october 1, 2005 and the exemptions stood discontinued in view of the bar created under section 80(13) of the vat act .....

Almora Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd. and Four ors. Vs. State of Uttarakh ...

Court : Uttaranchal

..... mention here that after issuance of the earlier notification dated 5-8-2005, the government itself had filed reply to the state information commissioner that the urban cooperative bank is not controlled and funded by the state government and it is not a creature of state legislature and it is not covered under section 2(h) of the right to information act, 2005 (for short the act). ..... prima facie the petitioners are not 'public authority' under the act, therefore, by appointing the registrar, co-operative societies as 'public authority unit' in relation to urban cooperative banks of uttarakhand is against the provisions of the act and the registrar cooperative societies already having been appointed as appellate authority of uttaranchal ..... public authority as has been defined under section 2(h) of the act may include any authority or body or institution of self-government ..... dated 5th august 2005 could not have been appointed public authority of the body or institution, like petitioners, which is not covered under the provisions of the act.10. ..... moreover, in the impugned notification dated 5-8-2005 (annexure-7 to the petition), the registrar cooperative societies has been notified as an appellate ..... the earlier notification dated 5th august 2005 (annexure-7 to the writ petition ..... under right to information act.iii) to issue any other writ, order or direction, which this hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.iv) award the cost of the writ petition in .....

Nirmal Jeet Kaur Vs. State of Uttarakhand, Through Home Secretary Dehr ...

Court : Uttaranchal

..... on the other hand, in reply to above, learned respondent no.2 and 3 drew attention of this court to sub-section (2), of section 28 protection of women from domestic violence act 2005, which reads as under: nothing in sub-section (1) shall prevent the court from laying dwon its own procedure for disposal of an application under section 12 or under section sub ..... as such setting aside of ex-parte order by the magistrate under the protection of women from domestic violence act-2005 cannot be said to be arbitrary or against the basic principles of judicial procedure, particularly when sub- section (2) of sub-section 28 of the act, provides that nothing in sub-section (1) shall prevent the court from laying down its own procedure for disposal of an application under section 12 or sub-section ..... (6) as to the procdure of the proceeding under protection of women from domestic violence act-2005 sub-section (1) of sub-section (28) provides that save as otherwise provided in the act of proceeding under section 12, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23 and under section 31 shall be governed by the provision of code ..... mention here that proceeding based on an application under section 12, the protection of women from domestic violence act-2005 are not the proceeding of trial of an offence. ..... relations between the parties to matrimony got soured and the petitioner nirmal jeet kaur moved an application under section 12 read with section 18, 19, 20, and 21 of protection of women from domestic violence act-2005. .....

Sanjeev Tyagi and ors. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2005(4)AWC3103(UHC)

..... in reply to that, the district education officer, haridwar vide his letter dated 29.1.2005 (copy annexure-8) reminded the manager that in the said list of 615 persons, names of those are included whose membership was cancelled. ..... 6 sent with his letter dated 17.5.2005 containing names of as many as 615 members. ..... this court is also bound to keep in mind the order passed on 27.6.2005 by a division bench in special appeal no. ..... 3 passed an order dated 24.3.2005 directing the respondent no. ..... 3 concealing the facts on which the order dated 18.2.2005 was passed by respondent no. 3. ..... it has further been stated in the counter-affidavit that the committee of management vide meeting dated 12.1.2005 had notified the date of election as sunday, 15.5.2005. ..... intermediate education act, 1921. ..... intermediate education act, 1921. ..... 31 of 2005 which arose out of the interim order passed in this writ petition. ..... the dispute relates to induction of new members and holding of elections which were due to be held in the month of may 2005.7. .....

Smt. Madhuri Rawat and ors. Vs. Yogamber Singh Rawat and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : IV(2005)ACC75; 2005(2)AWC1475(UHC)

..... the apex court has observed as under :'the situation has now undergone a change with the enactment of the motor vehicles act, 1988, as amended by the amendment act 54 of 1994. ..... , 2005 acj 99, the apex court has held as under :in the case of v.p. .....