Hire Purchase - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: hire purchase Page 1 of about 65 results (0.034 seconds)Deep Hire Purchase P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Interest-tax (Appeals)
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Reported in: (2005)195CTR(P& H)174; [2005]274ITR69(P& H)
the Commissioner of Interest-tax (Appeals) and levy tax on the hire-purchase charges on the basis of the findings recorded by him.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDeep Hire Purchase (P) Ltd. Vs. Cit
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Reported in: [2005]144TAXMAN417(Punj& Har)
officer to scrutinise all the transactions to sort out genuine hire-purchase transactions and then put to charge the interest on the interest as under :Rs.(i)Hire-purchase charges earned 4,75,745(ii)Interest other than hire purchase earned 2,282 Total chargeable interest 4,78,027Similarly, the assessment for the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMadras Hire Purchase Association Represented by Mr. NitIn Sagan Vs. Un ...
Court: Chennai
Reported in: (2009)225CTR(Mad)289; (2009)5MLJ1137; [2009]18STJ235(Madras); 2009[16]STR3; (2009)25VST446(Mad)
not be sale in law. The petitioners/appellant admit that in hire purchase/leasing, they collect 1% of service charges which details are are liable to pay service tax for leasing and hire purchase transactions so far as service element is concerned and VAT
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMadras Hire Purchase Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Chennai
Reported in: [2009]21STT355
is leviable if any element of service is involved; that hire-purchase/leasing are transfer of movable where there is no service element Service tax is levied on service not on sale or purchase of goods. The said tax is on service and not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVivek Hire Purchase and Leasing Limited Rep. by Its Vice President, Mr ...
Court: Chennai
Reported in: [2006]129CompCas343(Mad); 2005(1)CTC524; (2005)2MLJ8; [2005]62SCL245(Mad)
respondent company approached the petitioner with a request to provide hire purchase finance in relation to purchase of eight Compaq laptop namely the respondent, the right is given under the hire purchase agreement to re-possess the hired goods. This Court need not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKaruna Hire Purchasing and Leasing Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT.-I MUVATUPUZHA APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONER/COMPLAINANT:: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ KARUNA HIRE PURCHASING & LEASING, VELLOORKUNNAM, MUVATTUPUZHA REPRESENTED BY SHAJU.V. PAUL, MANAGING Crl.Appeal No.301/2003 4 of vehicle which is subject to hire purchase agreement can only be made with the consent of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKarnataka Hire Purchase Association and Others Vs. Commissioner for Tr ...
Court: Karnataka
it is held that, if any dispute with regard to hire purchase contract is concerned, it is to be resolved on the agreement is there in the form of a hire purchase contract. Necessarily that hire purchase agreement forms the basis on
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNagpur Vehicle Hire Purchase Association, a Society Duly Registered Un ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: 2007(4)BomCR246
(B) Whenever these financial institutions/banks/finance corporations approach for registering the hire purchase/mortgage charge, they should make it compulsory to seek trade who is engaged in business of hypothecation, lease or hire purchase of motor vehicles, nevertheless, this class of traders/financers does not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGanga Hire Purchase Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR2000SC449; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)320; 2000CriLJ587; 2000(70)ECC18; 2000(121)ELT9(SC); JT1999(10)SC254; (1999)5SCC670
is retained with the appellant until and unless the entire hire purchase money is paid back. But, if the contention of of the appellant is that in view of the hire purchase agreement, the appellant continues legally to be 'the owner' of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBengal Hire Purchase Corporation Vs. Harendra Singh and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Reported in: AIR1987Cal219
impounding Ext. 13 be paid by the respondent M/s Bengal Hire Purchase Corporation. Therefore, the lacuna and/or the irregularity in the were converted into alleged arbitration agreement and the alleged hire purchase agreement I have already recorded, that in that matter I
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>