Skip to content


Hire Purchase - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: hire purchase Page 1 of about 65 results (0.034 seconds)
Nov 17 2004 (HC)

Deep Hire Purchase P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Interest-tax (Appeals)

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2005)195CTR(P& H)174; [2005]274ITR69(P& H)

the Commissioner of Interest-tax (Appeals) and levy tax on the hire-purchase charges on the basis of the findings recorded by him.

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 17 2004 (HC)

Deep Hire Purchase (P) Ltd. Vs. Cit

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: [2005]144TAXMAN417(Punj& Har)

officer to scrutinise all the transactions to sort out genuine hire-purchase transactions and then put to charge the interest on the interest as under :Rs.(i)Hire-purchase charges earned 4,75,745(ii)Interest other than hire purchase earned 2,282 Total chargeable interest 4,78,027Similarly, the assessment for the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 09 2009 (HC)

Madras Hire Purchase Association Represented by Mr. NitIn Sagan Vs. Un ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2009)225CTR(Mad)289; (2009)5MLJ1137; [2009]18STJ235(Madras); 2009[16]STR3; (2009)25VST446(Mad)

not be sale in law. The petitioners/appellant admit that in hire purchase/leasing, they collect 1% of service charges which details are are liable to pay service tax for leasing and hire purchase transactions so far as service element is concerned and VAT

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 09 2009 (HC)

Madras Hire Purchase Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2009]21STT355

is leviable if any element of service is involved; that hire-purchase/leasing are transfer of movable where there is no service element Service tax is levied on service not on sale or purchase of goods. The said tax is on service and not

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 20 2005 (HC)

Vivek Hire Purchase and Leasing Limited Rep. by Its Vice President, Mr ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2006]129CompCas343(Mad); 2005(1)CTC524; (2005)2MLJ8; [2005]62SCL245(Mad)

respondent company approached the petitioner with a request to provide hire purchase finance in relation to purchase of eight Compaq laptop namely the respondent, the right is given under the hire purchase agreement to re-possess the hired goods. This Court need not

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 28 2014 (HC)

Karuna Hire Purchasing and Leasing Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT.-I MUVATUPUZHA APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONER/COMPLAINANT:: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ KARUNA HIRE PURCHASING & LEASING, VELLOORKUNNAM, MUVATTUPUZHA REPRESENTED BY SHAJU.V. PAUL, MANAGING Crl.Appeal No.301/2003 4 of vehicle which is subject to hire purchase agreement can only be made with the consent of the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 07 2011 (HC)

Karnataka Hire Purchase Association and Others Vs. Commissioner for Tr ...

Court: Karnataka

it is held that, if any dispute with regard to hire purchase contract is concerned, it is to be resolved on the agreement is there in the form of a hire purchase contract. Necessarily that hire purchase agreement forms the basis on

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 20 2007 (HC)

Nagpur Vehicle Hire Purchase Association, a Society Duly Registered Un ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(4)BomCR246

(B) Whenever these financial institutions/banks/finance corporations approach for registering the hire purchase/mortgage charge, they should make it compulsory to seek trade who is engaged in business of hypothecation, lease or hire purchase of motor vehicles, nevertheless, this class of traders/financers does not

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 07 1999 (SC)

Ganga Hire Purchase Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2000SC449; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)320; 2000CriLJ587; 2000(70)ECC18; 2000(121)ELT9(SC); JT1999(10)SC254; (1999)5SCC670

is retained with the appellant until and unless the entire hire purchase money is paid back. But, if the contention of of the appellant is that in view of the hire purchase agreement, the appellant continues legally to be 'the owner' of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 06 1986 (HC)

Bengal Hire Purchase Corporation Vs. Harendra Singh and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1987Cal219

impounding Ext. 13 be paid by the respondent M/s Bengal Hire Purchase Corporation. Therefore, the lacuna and/or the irregularity in the were converted into alleged arbitration agreement and the alleged hire purchase agreement I have already recorded, that in that matter I

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //