Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2004(2)ALD1; 2004(1)ALT659
..... of gujarat and anr., : [1975]1scr173 , b. banerjee : kamal lal ghosal v. anita pan, : [1975]2scr774 , union of india v. sankalghand himatlal sheth and anr., 0065/1977 : [1978]1scr423 , bhim sen v. state of u.p., : 1955crilj1010 , gamini krishnayya v. guraza seshachalam and ors., : [1965]1scr195 , raza buland sugar co., limited, rampur v. municipal board, rampur, : [1965]1scr970 , bhikraj jaipura v .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : II(2004)ACC591; 2004ACJ529; 2004(1)ALD449; 2004(1)ALT100
G. Raghuram, J.1. A Division Bench of this Court by an order dated 22-10-2002 recorded a dissent with decisions of the two earlier Division Benches of this Court in Union of India v. Uggina Srinivasa Rao, : 2001(3)ALD247 and Union of India v. B. Koddekar and Ors. : AIR2003AP23 , and made a reference in respect of Civil Miscellaneous Appeals preferred to this Court, by the Railways under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1989 against the respective orders of Railway Claims Tribunals.2. Whether a passenger trying to board or alight from a running train or standing near the door, jumped from the compartment, crossing the Railway track or leaning out of the carriage; and during the course of such circumstance had fallen down and was either injured or had died, was entitled to compensation from the Railways under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989, (the Act) is the question that in substance arises for consideration in this reference. Incidentally whether wrongful, careles...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2008(1)ALT715; 2008(2)CTLJ207(AP)
ORDERC.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.1. The action of respondent No. 2 in rejecting the technical bids of the petitioner pertaining to the works covered by two tender notifications (for short 'NITs') concerning the works of widening of High Level Bridge to 8 lane carriage way across Musi river at KM 2/0 to 2/2 of Inner Ring Road (Nagole Bridge) including approaches right-side and left-side in Ranga Reddy district is questioned in this writ petition.2. The petitioner is a registered Special Class Contractor and he is admittedly eligible to file his tenders in respect of the works in question. The High Level Bridge as described above is divided into two works and NITs were issued separately for the work of widening of bridge on right-side (for short 'right-side work') vide Tender No.38539/E-In-C(R&B;)/EE(TEC)/TA12/AEE5/07/01 dated 06.10.2007 for an estimated contracted value of Rs. 2,66,57,986/-and for the work of widening of bridge on left-side (for short 'leftside work') vide Tender No. 38539/...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2008(2)ALD49
ORDERD. Appa Rao, J.1. This is a revision preferred by the tenant against the order in appeal -R.A. No. 278 of 2002 dated 18.10.2006 confirming the orders of eviction in RC No. 174 of 1997, on the file of learned Principal Rent Controller, Hyderabad.2. The case of the landlord in brief is that the tenant - the revision petitioner herein, executed a rental deed in his favour on 5.1.1990 agreeing to pay a monthly rent of Rs. 150-00 by 5th of every English calendar month, for Mulgi bearing Municipal No. 20-7-331 situated at Fateh Darwaza, Hyderabad. He did not pay rents for the months from January, 1997 to March, 1997 amounting to Rs. 450-00 and committed default intentionally and therefore he was liable for eviction. He also committed default in payment of rents from December 2000 to the end of December, 2001. He also pleaded that the tenant sublet the premises to the second respondent. Therefore, he prayed that the tenant be evicted.3. The tenant resisted the petition alleging that he d...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1986KAR1365; 1985(2)KarLJ397; [1985]60STC142(Kar)
ORDERPuttaswamy, J.1. On a reference made by one of us, these cases were posted before a Division Bench for disposal. 2. A statutory Board called 'the Coffee Board' ('the Board') which was formerly called the Indian Coffee Market Expansion Board constituted and functioning under the Coffee Act of 1942 (Central Act VII of 1942) ('the Coffee Act') is the common petitioner before us and the principal question that arises for our determination is whether it is exigible to purchase tax or not under section 6 of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act of 1957 (Karnataka Act 25 of 1957) ('KST Act'). In order to decide that principal and certain other allied questions, it is necessary to notice the facts that are not also in dispute in the first instance. 3. On the out break of the II World War, the Indian coffee that enjoyed precious export markets in European and other advanced countries lost them and the industry was facing a crisis. With the object of rehabilitating the industry and placing it on a so...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2002(6)ALD720
..... deans of different faculties, who were asked to enquire into the incident and submit a report immediately, the following are the members of the said committee:1. professor k.d. sen, school of chemistry2. prof. e. haribabu, chairman, disciplinary committee3. prof. p. mohanty, centre for a.l. & t.s.4. prof. probal dasgupta, centre for a.l. & t.s.5. dr .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2007(2)ALD28; 2007(3)ALT265
ORDERV.V.S. Rao, J.1. The background facts in all these writ petitions and the civil revision petition are same. The rival claim of the parties - be it petitioners or respondents; is in respect of the same land admeasuring about Acs. 55.00 in Survey Nos. 210 to 213, 221 to 225 (for the sake of convenience referred to hereinafter as schedule land) situated at Papayyaguda Hamlet of Kuntloor Village of Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The contentions raised and the documents relied on are almost the same. It is therefore expedient to pass common order.Background Facts (For the sake of convenience, the Writ Petition No. 3012 of 2002 is treated as comprehensive one and parties are also referred as per their status therein).2. The schedule land and other extents of land (total extent of 300 acres in same survey numbers) originally belonged to one Vakiti Pulla Reddy, husband of eighth respondent. After enactment of A.P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (herea...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Reported in : AIR1986Guj209; (1986)1GLR1
..... term but also judicial authorities functioning under diverse statutes. mr. gupta then invited our attention to the decision of the supreme court in the case of engineering mazdoor sabha v. hind cycles ltd. : (1962)iillj760sc . in that case, the constitution bench of the supreme court was concerned with the question whether the award passed by the arbitrator appointed by parties as per ..... .'in the case of grindlays bank v. central govt. industrial tribunal : (1981)illj327sc a division bench of the supreme couri consisting of y. v. chandrachud, c.j. and a. p. sen, j. was concerned with the question whether the tribunal under the i.d. act had power to set aside an ex parte award. it was observed :--'a review is on .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 2006(4)BomCR1
R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J1. Since common questions of law and facts arise in both the petitions, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. 2. The Goa Public Health Act, 1985, hereinafter called as 'the Health Act' has been amended by the Public Health (Amendment) Act, 2005, hereinafter called as 'the Amendment Act'. The petitioners challenge the Amendment Act, on the ground that the same encroaches upon the legislation by the Parliament i.e. the Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003, hereinafter called as 'the Tobacco Act', and Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, hereinafter called as 'Food Adulteration Act' which relate to Entry Nos.33 and 18 respectively of Concurrent List and considering the Entry No. 52 of Union List read with declaration under Section 2 of the Tobacco Act, the entire tobacco industry comes under the control of Uni...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 2003(5)KarLJ26; (2003)IIILLJ861Kant
1. A learned Single Judge of this Court by a common order impugned in these writ appeals has allowed writ petitions filed by management of Beedi Manufacturing Industries and quashed notification dated 24-10-1996 issued by the Government of Karnataka under Sections 3 and 5 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (for short, 'the Act') revising the rates of minimum wage in the Beedi Manufacturing Industries. Being aggrieved by the said judgment of the learned Single Judge, the State of Karnataka and the concerned Trade Unions representing the workforce in the Beedi Manufacturing Industries have filed these writ appeals.2. Beedi industries is spread throughout the State of Karnataka and the employees in the said industry number more than 8 lakhs. Employment in Beedi Manufacturing Industries is a scheduled employment as per the provisions of the Act. Under Section 3 of the Act, the appropriate Government is empowered to fix and revise minimum wages in the scheduled employment. This is an obligation...
Tag this Judgment!