High Court Judges Salaries And Conditions Of Service Act 1954 Amending Act 1 High Court And Supreme Court Judges Salaries And Conditions Of Service Amendment Act 2005 - Judgment Search Results

M.L. JaIn and anr. Vs. Union of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1985SC619; 1985LabIC813; 1985(1)SCALE636; (1985)2SCC355; [1985]3SCR608; 1985(2)SLJ79(SC); 1985(17)LC790(SC)

21 days.3. When he was appointed a Judge of the High Court he appears to have opted, for the purpose of been decided that....(i) The service as Judge of the High Court will count towards qualifying service for pension in his parent to (he High Courts Judges'(Conditions of Service) Act the retiring Judges entire service as a Judge has to be reckoned for the Conditions of Service of Judges in the matter of salaries, allowances etc. which changes also brook no further delay if apart from the other changes for the improvement of the Conditions of Service of Judges in the matter of salaries, allowances Session Judge on July 31, 1977. His total period of service as a Judicial Officer, otherwise than as a Judge of 1st Schedule to the High Court Judges' (Conditions of Service) Act, 1954. Paragraph two of Part III of the 1st Schedule provided in the High Court Judges, (Conditions of Service) Act, 1954.6. We are of the opinion that para 2(ii) of the Schedule was apparently done pursuant to the letter dated September 19, 1984 from the Ministry of Law. Justice and company Affairs

Supreme Court Bar Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2007SC1670; (2007)3GLR2757; JT2007(5)SC438; (2007)3MLJ826(SC); (2007)147PLR83; 2007(5)SCALE630; (2007)4SCC353

the Governor, in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court, to be the Executive Chairman.Section 7 of the Act Authority shall consist of the Chief Justice of the High Court who shall be the Patron-in-Chief and a Judge of the Officers including District Judges and even to persuade the sitting Judges to participate in the Legal Aid Programmes and activities of Judge. The relevant provisions of the Act regarding State Legal Service Authority contained in Section 6(2) are as follows:(2) A State fix by regulations. Section 8 requires the State Authority to act in coordination with other Governmental Agencies, non-Governmental Voluntary Service Institution, the office copy of the D.O. letter No. 538/C.J.Res dated 13.12.2006 to me along with letter No....-L dated 8.12.2006 written by 1950 (in short the 'Constitution') has been filed by the Supreme Court Bar Association raising points of considerable importance. It is sought for views of the Chief Justice. On February 26, 2005, the Secretary to Government, Law Department, has noted in the

In Re: S. Mulgaokar

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1978)3SCC339; [1978]3SCR162

establishmentarians. Not because the judge, the human symbol of a high value, is personally armoured by a regal privilege but because implications that nullify the guarantees of impartial trials. And since courts, are the ultimate resorts for vindicating the Bill of Rights, including the highest Court.32. The fifth normative guideline for the judges to observe in this jurisdiction is not to be hypersensitive American legal history has lessons for us but when national conditions vary adaptation, not imitation, is the creative alternative, to avoid public molestation, is judicial. Vicious criticism of personal and administrative acts of Judges may indirectly mar their image and weaken the Sharma and Ors. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh : 1954CriLJ238 this Court said :It seems, therefore, that there are two specific reference to the press in the text of the Amendment and by the precedents of this Court.The argument further asserts the Judges' Inquiries Act, 1968.10. The article of 21 December, 1977, referred to above, ends by attempting to make a distinction try it and decide it.4. Comments about Judges of the Supreme Court suggesting that they lack moral courage to the extent enforced and protected by observing such methods and traditions..The Fourteenth Amendment does not forbid a state to continue the historic process

Justice P. Venugopal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC3887; JT2003(Suppl1)SC505; 2003(7)SCALE197; (2003)7SCC726; 2004(1)LC332(SC)

we find it difficult to accept the reasoning of the High Court that the matter of opinion to club the two be: (a) for service as Chief Justice in any High Court Rs. 14,630/- per annum for each completed year of service; to Section 14, 15 and 16 of the High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to not would depend upon the statute or the terms and conditions of appointment. 27. For the reasons aforementioned, we are of Court that the matter of opinion to club the two services for pension is a subject on which the Rules are to 'a serving Judge of a High Court under the Act and the Rules made thereunder' 3. Does a Judge of contained in the High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 and High Court Judges (Travelling Allowances) Rules, 1956'19. The question date on which the High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Amendment Act, 1976, receives the assent of the President cancel such service as any other Judge in any High Court Rs. 11,150/- per annum for each completed year of service, provided that stated in the order are the findings recorded by the Supreme Court which would bind the parties thereto and also the date on which the High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Amendment Act, 1976, receives the assent of the President cancel such

State of Rajasthan Vs. Prakash Chand and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1998SC1344; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)93; 1998(1)ALT(Cri)112; 1998CriLJ2012; (1998)2GLR1149; JT1997(9)SC492; (1998)1SCC1; [1997]Supp6SCR1

for occupation of the Guest House in 1994 by the High Court, the Chief Justices have continued to draw their full at Jaipur were debited to the account of the High Court of Rajasthan by the State Government. The Bungalow was in to the independence of the judiciary. Eternal vigilance by the Judges to guard against any such latent internal danger is, therefore, geyser/heater/cooler Rs. 4 will be charged extra and if air conditioning machine is there Rs. 6 instead of Rs. 4 will of judiciary. It needs no emphasis to say that all actions of a Judge must be judicious in character. Erosion of para 2 of the High Court Judges Travelling Allowances Rules, 1956, (supra) a Judge including a Chief Justice is not entitled are transferred or are appointed as Judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court are issued Last Pay Certificate by the Concerned District

The All Kerala Poor Aid Legal Association, Trivandrum and ors. Vs. Chi ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1990Ker241

vested by Article 217 in the Chief Justice of a High Court or the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is v. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth, AIR 1977 SC 2328. The Supreme Court held that a judge does not hold office under the 1. These writ petitions relate to appointment of High Court Judges; and reliefs sought are similar to a measure. Petitioners profess given length of service or standing at the Bar are conditions of eligibility. As the Article is silent about merit, irrespective Judge of the High Court, is a 'post in the service under the State'. Constitutional Offices, such as that of Judges judges of High Court being called upon to sit and act as judges.15. Turning to O.P. 9358/89, -- counsel submits that SC 1427, State of Kerala v. N. M. Thomas, AIR 1976 SC 490, Jagdish Saran v. Union of India, AIR 1980 Chief Justice, Chief Minister of Kerala, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and the President, are bound to extend preferential treatment

K Sankaran Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, KeralA.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [1978]115ITR561(Ker)

the dispute to an arbitrator who shall be a retired High Court Judge. The assessee was then at Bangalore and was was commenced by way of a petition in the District Court of Ceylon, it was well within the contemplation and anticipation terms as s. 10(3) of the 1961 Act. The learned judges stated that no rule can be laid with regard to view of the caution administered against transplanting into the Indian conditions and the provisions of the Indian statute, the principles laid - if not express, but implicit - that for the services rendered the nominees, as the instance of the distribution committee, assistance in the determination of the question whether a particular activity or course of conduct constitutes business or the exercise of the case.S. 13 of the Madras Electricity Undertaking (Acquisition) Act, 1954, provides for the appointment of an arbitrator who shall be the Government passed orders fixing the arbitrators remuneration as Rs. 12,000 as to a letter dated June 1, 1961, from the Tribunal. We think that the principle laid down by the Supreme Court will only apply to cases where an advertance to

Pritam Pal Vs. High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur Through Registra ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1992SC904,1992CriLJ1269,1992(1)Crimes1012(SC),JT1992(2)SC41,1992(1)SCALE416,1993Supp(1)SCC529,[1992]1SCR864

of the derogatory remarks and forwarded the same to the High Court through the District Judge to initiate proceedings for Contempt already existing in it by reason of its being a court of record, or whether the article confers the power as if the Court considers the attack on the judge or judges scurrilous, offensive, intimidatory or malicious beyond condonable limits, the strong him the contributory provident fund benefits for his 10 years service though the date of his superannuation in the said post III in exercise of which the Parliament has enacted the Act 1971, the contempt jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and the Sharma and Others v. The State of Uttar Pradesh : 1954CriLJ238 .24. From the above judicial pronouncements of this Court, it 4246/78 were filed by the appellant, they being one for amendment of the petition and the other for taking some additional arbitrary because after notice had been issued to the respondents 1 to 3 show cause why the petition be not admitted, of the Constitution and, therefore, the inherent power of the Supreme Court and the High Court cannot be taken away by no objection and granted one week time for incorporating the amendments in the petition. At the request of the counsel for

Syed Iqbal Ali Imam Raza Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court: Patna

Service. At that time there were several vacancies in the High Court and as per the prevalent convention of appointing 1 S.N. Jha, J. 1. The Supreme Court by its judgment in All India Judges' Association v. Union amongst, the Judges and is a result whereof, the other Judges of the Court did not have occasion to consider the primacy to the Judiciary in matters relating to the service conditions of the subordinate Judiciary, the Governor of the State should be that so far as the members of Subordinate Judicial Service are concerned, it is the Governor, who being the appointing After the High Court comes to the conclusion that some action either in the nature of compulsory retirement by the imposition reference to other Judges. Clause (x) which was added by amendment on 1st April 1975 reads:-- 'The standing committee shall have and HaryanaHigh Court, AIR 1976 SC 2490 : (1976 Lab 1C1633) etc. it is now too well settled thatopinion or recommendation Adminstrative Committee constituted under the rules of the Court. The Supreme Court accepted the minority view and held that although the reference to other Judges. Clause (x) which was added by amendment on 1st April 1975 reads:-- 'The standing committee shall have

Emperor Vs. Ahmad Khan

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1912)ILR34All96

by no means sure that the game which the Calcutta High Court Judges had under consideration was precisely the same as asks us to interfere with the view taken by these courts, has referred us to a Calcutta ruling in Criminal Revision means sure that the game which the Calcutta High Court Judges had under consideration was precisely the same as is described of the Bengal Public Gambling Act and Section 12 of Act No. III of 1867, which is the Act which governs Section 10 of the Bengal Public Gambling Act and Section 12 of Act No. III of 1867, which is the Act