Henceforth - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: henceforth Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 167 results (0.008 seconds)Smt. Rajrani Gupta Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-18-2012
m s sanklecha j this appeal under section 260a of the income tax act 1961 the act by the appellant...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Seebaiah and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka Represented by Its P ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-29-2012
1 succinctly stated the bangalore district and bangalore rural district co operative central bank employees 8217 co operative society limited...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Hutti Gold Mines Company Ltd. Vs. Union of India, Ministry of Min ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-03-2012
vikramajit sen cj 1 we have heard the learned counsel for the parties in full detail the petitioner prays for...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSubramanian Swamy. Vs. A. RajA.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-24-2012
..... allotments of spectrum to access subscriber licensees under uasl regime may henceforth be specifically priced and charged for the charge may be ..... start up rdquo allocation of 4 4 mhz ndash may henceforth be specifically priced and charged for details in this regard ..... percentage of adjusted gross revenue agr for different spectrum bands may henceforth be charged as a percentage of agr based on volume .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdarsh Shiksha Mahavidyalaya and ors. Vs. Subhash Rahangdale and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-06-2012
..... ncte is hereby directed under section 29 of the ncte act 1993 that recognition may henceforth not be granted to any teacher training institutions courses additional intake falling within the jurisdiction ..... under section 29 of the ncte act 1993 on august 21 2007 that recognition may henceforth not be granted to any teacher training institutions courses additional intake falling within the jurisdiction .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaju @ Viswas S/O. Bharatrao Shitole and Others Vs. State of Maharasht ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Oct-19-2012
..... dispute amicably and they do not want to prosecute against each other and undertake that henceforth they would live peacefully since cordial relations have been developed between them the applicants ..... and respondent no 2 also undertook that henceforth they will not create litigation against each other and shall reside in cooperation moreover .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Lavanya Enterprises Vs. Sri Bhramaramba Mallikarjuna Swamyvarla
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-28-2012
..... 1st respondent devasthanam has floated notice inviting tender online version henceforth referred to as quot n i t quot inviting bids ..... pradesh charitable and hindu religious institutions amp endowments act 1987 henceforth referred to as quot act quot for brevity has framed ..... rights other than agricultural lands leases and licenses rules 2003 henceforth referred to as quot rules quot as per rules 3 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAtul Bhalla Vs. Anil Bhalla and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-31-2012
..... account of the property in respect of municipal taxes maharani bagh society dda charges shall henceforth be borne by the parties equally and each one of the parties shall pay and ..... thereto the severance is complete the unity of title and possession has been severed and henceforth the parties have agreed to enjoy the property in individuality nbsp with respect to different .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV. Harinatha Reddy, S/O Nagireddy Presen Vs. the Assistant Director (A ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-27-2012
..... as bad in law the petitioner joined the service of the central reserved police force henceforth referred to as force in the year 1895 as a constable while he was working ..... by the petitioner while undergoing treatment at apollo hospital central services medical attendant rules 1944 henceforth referred to as rules were notified on 01 01 1944 these rules apply to all .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhopal Gas Peedith Mahila Udyog Sangathan and ors. Vs. Union of India ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-09-2012
..... not only desirable but also in the interest of all concerned that this matter should henceforth be dealt with by the high court of madhya pradesh bench at jabalpur 22 in ..... madhya pradesh high court for better and effective control in this case all applications filed henceforth shall be dealt with and disposed of by the concerned bench of the high court .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial