Harmonic - Judgment Search Results

United States Vs. Mead Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 1434 argued november 8 2000 decided june 18 2001 the harmonized tariff schedule of the united states authorizes the united ..... to a less exact sort of fastening described in the harmonized commodity description and coding system explanatory notes to heading ..... also may have reinforcements or fittings of metal plastics etc harmonized commodity description and coding system explanatory notes to heading .....

Xerox Modicorp. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2001)(130)ELT165TriDel

..... printer would be classifiable under sub heading 8471 60 6200 harmonized tariff schedule of the united states hts the other opinion ..... that the applicable sub heading for the product under the harmonized tariff schedule of the united states would be 8471 60 ..... justified classification of such goods under heading 8471 60 of the harmonized tariff schedule of the united states which corresponds to the .....

Ntb International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2000)(121)ELT134Tri(Mum.)bai

..... transmission characteristics to the belt he also invited our attention to the rulings of the harmonized system of the world customs organization issued in february 1995 amending supplement no 14 where ..... the course of arguments shri sridharan had handed over to us the opinion of customs harmonized system of the customs cooperative council which has been extracted above unfortunately this was not .....

Commr. of C. Ex. and Cus. Vs. Integral Bearings Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2001)(131)ELT155Tri(Mum.)bai

..... this assembly is known as a bearing by the views as explanatory notes to the harmonized system of nomenclature explains the friction is considerably reduced such bearings may be designed to .....

Gujarat Petrosynthese Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (2001)76ITD257(Ahd.)

..... as unconstitutional shri palkhiwala has therefore opined that sub sections 1 and 2 should be harmonized and set off of unabsorbed depreciation and other allowances should be worked out till the .....

Yodeva Plastics (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2001)(73)ECC507

..... that are useful principally for stationary service in terms of the explanatory notes to the harmonized commodity description and coding system under heading 85 07 page 1343 electric accumulators storage batteries .....

Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus. Vs. Formica India Division

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2001)(133)ELT743Tri(Mum.)bai

..... use 7 the explanatory notes to chapter 39 and of the 76 contained in the harmonized system of nomenclature do not afford us any guidance in the classification the departmental representative .....

Triveni Engineering and Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commissioner of C ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2000SC2896; 2000(71)ECC225; 2000(120)ELT273(SC); JT2000(9)SC38; 2000(5)SCALE468; (2000)7SCC29; [2000]Supp2SCR199

..... functional 22 it will be useful to refer to the explanatory note issued by the harmonized sys tem of nomenclature hsn to which mr sridharan invited our attention we also note .....

United India Insurance Company Ltd, Branch Office, Dharmapuri Vs. A. G ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: II(2000)ACC363; 2002ACJ539; 2000(1)CTC306

..... does not cross swords with the main purpose highlighted earlier the effort must be to harmonize the two instead of allowing the exclusion clause to snipe successfully at the main purpose .....

Prof. Chandra Prakash Jha and ors. Vs. Vice Chancellor, Allahabad Univ ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (2000)2UPLBEC1134

..... are not in agreement with this submission entry 66 of list 1 has to be harmonized with entry 25 of list 3 entry 66 of list 1 refers to co ordination .....