Harmless Error - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: harmless error Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 11 results (0.037 seconds)Brown Vs. Sanders
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-11-2006
..... to distinguish between weighing and nonweighing states for purposes of determining whether to apply harmless error analysis is unrealistic impractical and legally unnecessary a use of the distinction is ..... have found unsatisfactory the court s efforts to distinguish between the two statements for harmless error purposes see e g steiker steiker sober second thoughts reflections on two decades .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWashington Vs. Recuenco
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-26-2006
..... defendant was armed with a firearm so that it is impossible to conduct harmless error analysis on the blakely error in his case the correctness of respondent s interpretation however is not determinative ..... sentence accordingly thus in order to find for respondent we would have to conclude that harmless error analysis would apply if washington had a crime labeled assault in the second degree while .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Gonzalez-lopez
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-26-2006
..... dichotomy asserting that fulminante never said that trial errors are the only sorts of errors amenable to harmless error review or that all errors affecting the framework within which the trial proceeds ..... two courses outlined above requiring at least some showing of prejudice or engaging in harmless error review would avoid the anomalous and unjustifiable consequences that follow from the majority .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTZedner Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-05-2006
..... 1997 continuance is not excluded from the speedy trial clock this error is not subject to harmless error review harmless error review under federal rule of criminal procedure 52 a presumptively applies ..... agreement on detainers antishuttling provision in light of its absolute language applying the harmless error rule would also tend to undermine the detailed requirements of the provisions regulating .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDy. Cit Vs. Coastal Power Co.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-30-2006
..... 11 under which the consultant agreed to indemnify and hold harmless the assessee company and its officers directors employees etc from ..... it says that the consultant agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the assessee company and its officers etc from all liabilities ..... kapila submitted that the assessing officer has committed a grave error in lumping the different companies in a single order erroneously .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Bank of India Vs. Moti Thawardas Dadlani and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-18-2006
Reported in: (2007)109BOMLR483
..... of the issuing bank i e the defendants to hold them harmless from any act on the part of the intermediary negotiating bank ..... fault the other situation contemplated is where the bank notices the error and returns the documents to the advising bank refusing to reimburse ..... that the article s predecessor exonerated the issuing bank for the errors of the advising bank provided that the issuing bank had not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDeputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise and ors. Vs. Chindura Mu ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-21-2006
Reported in: 2006(5)ALD769; 2006(5)ALT739; 2007CriLJ80
..... mind and does not proceed further the acts already done are harmless or not therefore being in possession of black jaggery and ..... challenge and argued that the learned single judge committed a serious error by nullifying the order of confiscation without even recording a ..... i a writ of certiorari can be issued for correcting errors of jurisdiction committed by inferior courts or tribunals these are .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMcdermott International Inc. Vs. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-12-2006
Reported in: 2006(5)ALD84(SC); 2006(2)ARBLR498(SC); (2007)1CALLT36(SC); (2007)3CompLJ213(SC); (2006)4MLJ456(SC); 2006(6)SCALE220; (2006)11SCC181; 2005(10)SCC353
..... from mii s sub contract scope of work mii shall hold harmless and keep indemnified bscl from any such claims to the ..... platform c substitution of materialsthe learned arbitrator committed a serious error in not taking into account the material evidence adduced by ..... procured or is otherwise invalid the section did not contain expression error of law the same was added by judicial interpretation while .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Karnataka by the Police Inspector Vs. R. Raju S/O Late Mahade ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-15-2006
Reported in: 2007CriLJ920; 2007(1)KarLJ189; 2007(1)AIRKarR178
..... within a second or minute or two due to minor trauma or relatively simple and harmless peripheral stimulation are caused by vagal inhibition 17 the commonest cause of such inhibition is ..... by pws 4 and 5 22 we therefore hold that the trial court was in error in placing and reliance on the insignificant omissions and contradictions in the prosecution case and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHyderabad Beverages Private Limited Etc. Vs. State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-18-2006
Reported in: 2006CriLJ3988
..... and health hence a dangerous act and cannot be made innocent and harmless by the want of knowledge or by the good faith of ..... health hence a dangerous act and cannot be made innocent and harmless by the want of knowledge or by the good faith of ..... concluding we should observe that the high court committed a serious error in these cases in quashing the criminal proceedings in different magistrates .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial