Court : Jharkhand
1 in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p. (c) no. 4901 of 2012 --- m/s agros impex india private limited --- --- ---- petitioner versus 1. the state of jharkhand through chief secretary,govt. of jharkhand 2. the secretary-cum-transport commissioner, govt. of jharkhand 3. the joint transport commissioner, govt of jharkhand, transport department 4. m/s rosemarta technologies ltd through its managing director --- respondents --- coram: the hon ble mr. justice aparesh kumar singh for the petitioner: m/s. jitendra singh, sr. advocate, pandey neeraj rai, suraj samdarshi, rohit ranjan sinha, advocates for the resp-state: mr. rajesh shankar, ga for the resp no. 4: mr. vaibhav kumar, advocate --- reserved on:28. 01/2016 pronounced on:31. 03/2016 --- 30 / 31.03.2016 petitioner entered into an agreement for execution of work of supply and affixation of high ( hsrp in short) on 30.04.2012 with the respondent transport department. the agreement has been terminated by the impugned order dated 13.08.2012 (annexure-2) issued under the signature of secretary cum commissioner, transport department (respondent no. 2). petitioner has also been debarred from participating in tender process for a period of five years by order dated 04.09.2012 bearing letter no. 923 (annexure-18) issued by the same respondent no. 2 on the ground that it had failed to implement the scheme, as per the terms and conditions of the agreement resulting in its termination. in the meantime, allotment of work for .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
cr. appeal (d.b.) no. 1248 of 2005 --------- against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 12.08.2004 passed by the addl. sessions judge-i, pakur in connection with s.c.no.24/2002. --------- 1. churka murmu.2. marang murmu.3. raghu besara.4. fateh besara. ...appellants -versus- the state of jharkhand. ...respondent --------- for the appellants: mr. kanti kumar ojha, advocate. for the state: mr. ravi prakash, a.p.p. present the hon'ble mr. justice d.n.upadhyay the hon'ble mr. justice ratnaker bhengra --------- by court this cr. appeal has been directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 12.08.2004 passed by the addl. sessions judge-i, pakur in connection with s.c.no.24/2002, corresponding to g.r.no.301/2001 (t.r.no.72/2002), arising out of hiranpur p.s. case no. 38/2001 whereby appellants have been held guilty for the offence punishable under sections 302/149 of the indian penal code and sentenced to undergo r.i. for life and to pay fine of rs.5,000/- each and in default of making payment of fine further r.i. for one year. appellant-fateh besra has been further held guilty for the offence punishable under section 148 of the indian penal code and sentenced to undergo r.i. for one year whereas remaining three appellants marang murmu, churka murmu, raghu besra have been held guilty for the offence under section 147 of the indian penal code and sentenced to undergo r.i. for six months. the sentences so passed were directed to run .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... 71 of 2008 it came to light about the involvement of the petitioner along with other accused persons of committing the murder of guria praveen and bhola bhogta and on the direction of the deputy superintendent of police c.c.r. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr.m.p. no. 947 of 2005 1. sushil kumar agrawal 2. kanta devi 3. pawan kumar agrawal ... petitioners versus the state of jharkhand opposite party --- coram: hon ble mr. justice rongon mukhopadhyay --- for the petitioners : mr. rajesh kumar, advocate for the state : mr. avinesh kumar, app --- c.a.v. on 28.01.2016 delivered on 05.04.2016 rongon mukhopadhyay, j.in this application, the petitioners have prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceedings including the first information report (f.i.r.) in connection with balidih p.s. case no. 73 of 2005 (g.r. no. 831 of 2005), which has been instituted for the offence punishable u/s 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120b of the indian penal code (i.p.c.).2. the prosecution story as would appear from the f.i.r. instituted on the basis of the written statement of the sub inspector of police, balidih p.s. is to the effect that during the course of investigation of balidih p.s. case no. 31 of 2005 which was registered for the offences punishable u/s 414 and 120b i.p.c., certain documents were seized and on the basis of the same a seizure list was prepared. it has been alleged that on verification of the documents seized, the same were found to be forged and were prepared by the petitioners no. 1 and 2 who are proprietor of m/ s. hanuman alloys private ltd. in connivance with petitioner no. 3 who is the sole administrator of m/s. hanuman alloys private ltd. along with proprietors of shree steels, balidih .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... the petitioner waited for long period of almost one and half decades and after long inordinate delay, no reason has been assigned by the petitioner, which is not acceptable at all. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... the villages are situated more than one and half kilometers from the place of occurrence. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... the high court no doubt made a half hearted attempt to justify the framing of the charge independent of the directions in rajbir's case (supra), but it would have been more appropriate to remit the matter back to the trial court for fresh orders rather ..... 14:- in the light of what we have said above, the order passed by the trial court and so also that passed by the high court are -4- clearly untenable and shall have to be set aside. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... pw 8 in his deposition has stated that he had noticed scuffle going on between the parties from a distance of about 100 feet, gradually he proceeded and after covering half of the distance he could able to identify kripanath chaudhary who caused injury to vijay kant by means of garasa. ..... as per statement, the occurrence continued for about half an hour, therefore, they were having sufficient time to extend help to the deceased but they did not do so and that put a question mark on their presence at the scene of occurrence at the relevant point of time. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... pw 8 in his deposition has stated that he had noticed scuffle going on between the parties from a distance of about 100 feet, gradually he proceeded and after covering half of the distance he could able to identify kripanath chaudhary who caused injury to vijay kant by means of garasa. ..... as per statement, the occurrence continued for about half an hour, therefore, they were having sufficient time to extend help to the deceased but they did not do so and that put a question mark on their presence at the scene of occurrence at the relevant point of time. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... in the light of the argument put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner she has submitted that her claim for the benefits under the scheme on account of death of her husband could not have been .....
Tag this Judgment!