Court : Jharkhand
..... in the rehabilitation-cum-amalgamation/merger scheme also there was a provision that the mmtc shall submit half yearly report to the bifr about the progress of the mica division. ..... the scheme itself envisages the monitoring by the bifr by stipulating a condition that mmtc shall submit half yearly reports of the progress made. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... members and relatives were returning after performing matkore ceremony (collecting earth from a holy place) and reached near a banyan tree, the appellants with their associates stopped the band party and light men by standing in the middle of the road, exchange of hot words took place between the informant party and the appellants whereafter appellant vijay kumar soni took out a pistol and ..... he has further pointed out that only because the appellant was present along with other accused and stopped the light men and band party, he could not be held guilty for the offence of murder because on the same set of evidence other co accused sunil prasad soni and nand lal sah ..... the appellants restrained the members present in the band party and light men on the road when they reached near the place 7 of occurrence, exchange of hot words took place between the parties whereafter appellant vijay kumar soni took out pistol from ..... the members who were present in the band party and light men have been examined and they have not supported the prosecution case on the point of identification of the accused persons, but they have proved the ..... sunil prasad soni and nand lal sah can well be justified because they did not commit any overt act after restraining the members present in the band party and light men. ..... to cause hindrance in the marriage ceremony of informant because they were having strained relation from before and for that they had stopped the members present in the band party and light men. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... members and relatives were returning after performing matkore ceremony (collecting earth from a holy place) and reached near a banyan tree, the appellants with their associates stopped the band party and light men by standing in the middle of the road, exchange of hot words took place between the informant party and the appellants whereafter appellant vijay kumar soni took out a pistol and ..... he has further pointed out that only because the appellant was present along with other accused and stopped the light men and band party, he could not be held guilty for the offence of murder because on the same set of evidence other co accused sunil prasad soni and nand lal sah ..... the appellants restrained the members present in the band party and light men on the road when they reached near the place 7 of occurrence, exchange of hot words took place between the parties whereafter appellant vijay kumar soni took out pistol from ..... the members who were present in the band party and light men have been examined and they have not supported the prosecution case on the point of identification of the accused persons, but they have proved the ..... sunil prasad soni and nand lal sah can well be justified because they did not commit any overt act after restraining the members present in the band party and light men. ..... to cause hindrance in the marriage ceremony of informant because they were having strained relation from before and for that they had stopped the members present in the band party and light men. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a. no.2421 of 2014 1. panpati devi, daughter of mundarika chaudhary; 2. shila kumari, daughter of mundarika chaudhary, both residents of village harharpur tola mahuwadham, p.o. mahuwadham, p.s. bhawnathpur, district - garhwa petitioners versus the state of jharkhand ... ... ... opp. party ------ coram: hon'ble mr. justice d. n. patel ----- for the petitioners: m/s. a.k. chaturvedi, rajesh kr singh, sourav kumar for the opp. party: m/s. s.s. prasad, ravi gupta, a.p.p. ------ 13/dated:28. h january, 2016 per d.n. patel, j.1) counsel for the petitioners argues out his case in detail.2) the a.p.p. has submitted that the trial is going on before the learned trial court i.e. the court of additional sessions judge-ii, garhwa in sessions trial no.194 of 2014. the accusation against these petitioners-accused persons are under sections 364, 302, 201 to be read with section 34 of the indian penal code. the a.p.p. has further submitted that there are two investigating officers in this case and both of them have been examined as pw.1 and pw.2 out of the total 10 witnesses. the a.p.p. further submitted that pw.1 is an investigating officer, but, the name of this witness is never mentioned in the charge- sheet. pw.2 is another investigating officer and the complainant is to be examined as a last witness.3) this is a very pathetic approach of the state in kidnapping and murder cases. nobody is sincere in the state of jharkhand for conviction. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
cr. appeal(db) no.1034 of 2009 [against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 28 th june,2005 passed by sri tarkeshwar prasad, sessions judge, saraikella-kharswan in connection with sessions trial no.101 of 2004 ]. ..... bogan sardar . appellant versus state of jharkhand ...respondent ---- for the appellant : mr. r.c.p.sah, advocates for the respondents : mr. amresh kumar, addl. p.p. ----- present the hon ble mr. justice d.n.upadhyay the hon'ble mr. justice ratnaker bhengra ----- by court: this criminal appeal has been directed against the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 28th june,2005 passed by learned sessions judge, saraikella-kharsawan in connection with sessions trial no.101 of 2004, whereby the appellant has been held guilty for the offence punishable under sections 302 and 448 of indian penal code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and also to pay fine of rs.500/- and in default of making payment of fine, he shall suffer further simple imprisonment for two months and further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. both the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.2. the case of the prosecution, as it appears from the written report lodged by pintu sardar, in brief, is that on 11.06.2004 at about 10 p.m. he woke up after hearing alarm raised by lengra sardar(deceased) and reached to the place and found appellant scuffling with deceased lengra sardar. he had seen bogan sardar(appellant) inflicting knife .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
cr. jail appeal (db) no.568 of 2008 (against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 19.08.2006, passed by the learned additional sessions judge, fast track court no. iv, hazaribagh, in sessions trial no. 305 of 1993, corresponding to g.r. case no. 1207 of 1985 arising out of katkamsandi, p.s. case no. 42 of 1985) shibu munda, son of late jahur munda, resident of village datokala, p.s. katkamsandi, district-hazaribagh. .... appellant versus the state of jharkhand ..... respondent --- present :- hon'ble mr. justice d. n. upadhyay hon'ble mr. justice ratnaker bhengra for the appellant :- mr. hasnain waris, amicus curie. for the state :- mr. mukesh kumar, a.p.p. --- by court 1. this criminal appeal from jail has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 19.08.2006, passed by the learned additional sessions judge, fast track court no.iv, hazaribagh, in connection with sessions trial no. 305 of 1993, corresponding to g.r. case no. 1207 of 1985, arising out of katkamsandi p.s. case no. 42 of 1985, whereby the appellant has been held guilty for the offence punishable under section 302 of the i.p.c and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life.2. the prosecution case, as it appears from the fardbeyan of kedar rana recorded on 27.06.1985 at about 16:45 hours at dardahia within p.s. katkasandi, district hazaribagh, is that on 25.06.1985 father of the informant had gone to the house of appellant to handover an axe which was .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... . and at about 0.10 hours, he saw light of motorcycle coming from dihi murum village side and when the motorcycle came near, he gave signal to stop, but the motorcyclist tried to escape from there by turning his motorcycle but the pillion rider ..... . now, in the light of above discussions, let us scrutinize the evidence of prosecution witnesses .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi. cr. revision no. 1373 of 2015 binod dhikar @ binod kumr dhikar petitioner. versus state of jharkhand opp.party. ------ coram the hon'ble mr. justice prashant kumar ----- for the petitioner : mr. pratuish lala for the opp.party : mr. rakesh kumar, app ----- 03/10.02.2016. this revision application is directed against the orders dated 31.08.2015 and 06.10.2015 passed by the addl. sessions judge,xv, dhanbad in s.t. no. 292/2015, whereby and where under he rejected the application of the petitioner filed under the juvenile justice ( care and protection ) act, 2000 for declaring him juvenile.2. it appears that in the aforesaid sessions trial, the petitioner has filed an application for declaring him juvenile on the basis of school certificate. it further appears that in course of inquiry, the learned court below called for the school admission register. the school admission register was brought by the principal, mahatma gandhi smarak middle school, bhulan barari, dhanbad and the same was proved by him as ext.1. while proving the same, the principal stated that the date of birth of the petitioner is 12.10.1997. however, the learned sessions judge after going through the ext.1 found that the name of the petitioner was written at serial no.8, which is the last name in the said admission register. he further found that the petitioner was admitted in the school on 05.01.2003. he then found that on 05.01.2003, altogether three students admitted .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
cr. appeal (d.b.) no. 1043 of 2004 -------- against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 21.05.2004 & 24.05.2004 respectively passed by the sessions judge, east singhbhum, jamshedpur in connection with s.t.no. 115 of 1994. --------- kaluram gujar. ...appellant -versus- the state of jharkhand. ... ...respondent --------- for the appellant: mr. d.k.karmakar, advocate. for the state: a.p.p. --------- present the hone'ble mr. justice d.n.upadhyay the hon'ble mr. justice ratnaker bhengra --------- by court this cr. appeal has been directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 21.05.2004 & 24.05.2004 respectively passed by the sessions judge, east singhbhum, jamshedpur in connection with s.t.no.115 of 1994, corresponding to g.r.no.1292/1992, arising out of parsudih (sunder nagar) p.s. case no. 71/1992 whereby the appellant has been held guilty for the offence punishable under section 302 of the indian penal code and sentenced to undergo r.i. for life.2. the facts appearing from the fardbayan of ram chandra choudhary recorded on 12.05.1992 at 5:00 hours at the residence of fulchand sharma situated within sunder nagar p.s., jamshedpur is that on 12.05.1992 in the morning at 4 a.m. appellant-kaluram gujar informed that ram narayan sharma and mahaveer sharma have been done to death by unknown miscreants. it is disclosed that the occurrence took place in the house of fulchand sharma situated within sunder nagar police station. on the date of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... it is submitted that he had gone to answer the call of nature to the place which is situated at the distance of half k.m from the house of the deceased. .....
Tag this Judgment!