Grammatical - Judgment Search Results

Lek Gwee Noi Vs. Humming Flowers and Gifts Pte Ltd.

Court: Singapore Supreme Court

..... termination of employment 24 clause 13 is both a legal construct and a grammatical construct as a grammatical construct it comprises three clauses connected by the conjunction and double underlined above ..... court of appeal s inquiry instead it considered whether the obligation in this single grammatical unit was a single obligation or a composite obligation divisible into three constituent promises .....

Hatimbhai Hassanally Vs. Framroz Eduljee Dinshaw

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1927Bom278; (1927)29BOMLR498

..... interpretation which would bring the enactment into consonance with those principles rather than accept a grammatical interpretation the result of which would be startling or unusual 9 in balaram v ramchandra ..... land or all other cases except land and 2 residence he submitted that if the grammatical construction is clear that construction must be accepted even if it involves jurisdiction over foreign .....

Indore Development Authority Vs. Manoharlal and Ors. Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... as parliamentary draftsmen punctuate what they write if not identically at least in accordance with grammatical principles why should not other literate people such as judges look at the punctuation ..... unless courts seek whenever possible to apply the golden rule of construction that is language grammatically and terminologically in the ordinary and primary sense which it bears its context without .....

B. Rajarajeshwari Vs. The Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal II ...

Court: Chennai

..... ex 352 356 it must however be conceded that where the grammatical construction is clear and manifest and without doubt that construction ..... of statutes is to construe them according to plain literal and grammatical meaning of the words if that is contrary to or ..... and are capable of a clear interpretation on a plain and grammatical construction of the words the non obstante clause cannot cut .....

Cairn Uk Holdings Limited Vs. Director of Income-tax

Court: Delhi

..... the verbal formulae and the accepted linguistic canons of construction an enactment is grammatically ambiguous where grammatically capable of more than one meaning a modern statement of the nuanced principle ..... tests are satisfied i semantic and syntactic ambiguity is apparent and therefore the legislation grammatically is capable of more than one meaning ii there is contextual ambiguity which can .....

M. Pramila and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Urban Development Depart ...

Court: Karnataka

..... are vague and ambiguous or where the plain and normal meaning of its words or grammatical construction thereof would lead to confusion absurdity repugnancy with other provisions the courts may ..... instead of adopting the plain and grammatical construction use the interpretative tools to set right the situation by adding or omitting or .....

P. Murugan Vs. The Registrar, Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal and Ot ...

Court: Chennai

..... ble supreme court observed where the language of a statute in its ordinary meaning and grammatical construction leads to a manifest contradiction of the apparent purpose of the enactment or to ..... basic principles of interpretation of statutes is to construe them according to plain literal and grammatical meaning of the words if that is contrary to or inconsistent with any express intention .....

Smt Pramila M Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

..... are vague and ambiguous or where the plain and normal meaning of its words or grammatical construction thereof would lead to confusion absurdity repugnancy with other provisions the courts may ..... instead of adopting the plain and grammatical construction use the interpretative tools to set right the situation by adding or omitting or .....

Carlos Alberto Perez Lafuente vs.uoi & Ors.

Court: Delhi

..... are vague and ambiguous or where the plain and normal meaning of its words or grammatical construction thereof would lead to confusion absurdity repugnancy with other provisions the courts may ..... instead of adopting the plain and grammatical construction use the interpretative tools to set right the situation by adding or omitting or .....

Nirode Chandra Mukherjee and ors. Vs. Chairman of Commissioners of Kam ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1936Cal506

..... which are so unsatisfactory can hardly be preferred to a construction which though not strictly grammatical applies more consistently to the act in all its parts see easter counties companies v ..... am not impressed with the interpretation favoured by the learned referring judges based on the grammatic construction of the sentence following the decision of two single sitting judges in kumud bandhu .....