Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: government of india act 1935 repealed section 248 rights in respect of complaints appeals etc Court: chennai Page 1 of about 14 results (0.057 seconds)

Jun 22 2016 (HC)

Nokia Solutions and Networks India Private Limited, Rep by its Authori ...

Court : Chennai

..... tax act, 1970, granting exemption in respect of sales tax, surcharge, resale tax and additional sales tax payable by any dealer on the sale of any goods made by such dealer to a registered dealer for the purpose of setting up, operation, maintenance, manufacture, trading, production, processing, assembling, repairing, reconditioning, re-engineering, packaging or for use as packing material or packing accessories in an unit located in madras special economic zone, tambaram, chennai and other special economic zones in the state of tamil nadu notified by the government of india .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 1948 (PC)

G. Narayanaswami Naidu and ors. Vs. the Inspector of Police

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1949)1MLJ1

..... the instructions of the governor-general have been obtained must be accepted as correct especially since nothing has been shown to the contrary. i do not see how it can be successfully urged that the provisions of section 88 of the government of india act have not been properly complied with. on the 25th may, 1948, the legislature was not in session. the ordinance recites that the governor is satisfied that immediate action is necessary. i am not prepared to agree with the contentions of the ..... 88 (1) would in that view be, in effect the satisfaction of the governor on such advice.. satisfaction in accordance with the wording of section 88 (1) is recited in the preamble, and there is no proof to the contrary. under section 51(4) of the government of india act:the question whether any and, if so, what advice was tendered by ministers to the governor shall not be inquired into in any court.this excludes all discussion of an allegation that no advice was or could have been tendered, but .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 24 1996 (HC)

R. Karuppan Vs. R. Namachivayam

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1998(99)ELT214(Mad)

..... act, 1992, foreign trade (regulation) rules, 1993 and the foreign trade (exemption from application of rules in certain cases) order, 1993. 33. our attention was drawn to the procedure for imports as regards the import of arms and ammunition by renowned shooters as well as gifts of consumer of other goods, which are found in paras 54 and 56 of the hand book of proceedures, volume i for the period 1-4-1992 to 31-3-1997, issued by the ministry of commerce, government of india ..... imported by national sports federation or by a sports person of outstanding eminence for training. the central government, in exercise of the power conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the customs act, 1962, exempts the goods of the description specified in column 2 of the table annexed to the general exemption no. 38, and falling within the first schedule to the customs tariff act, 1975, when imported into india, from the whole of the duty of customs leviable thereon, which is specified in the said first .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 1948 (PC)

In Re: Major F.K. Mistry

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1949)2MLJ44

..... of which he shall be guilty within the territories mentioned in the previous section, viz., those which are, or may become vested in the crown by statute 21 and 22, victoria, chapter 106, entitled 'an act for the better government of india'. according to section 5 of the indian penal code, this act is not intended to repeal, vary or suspend any special or local law. moreover, section 5 of the criminal procedure code, enacts that all offences under the indian penal code shall be investigated, enquired into, tried ..... but it can be taken as settled that there was no statute law which made such an offence punishable when act xxix of 1861 came into force. articles 124 and 125 of the same act provide that where any officer or soldier in any place within the jurisdiction of any criminal court established by her majesty or the government of india or any local government is accused of any offence triable by such court, he shall be delivered over to a magistrate to be proceeded against according .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 1989 (HC)

The Assistant Collector, Tiruvallur Vs. C. Ramamoorthy (Died) and Othe ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1990Mad185

..... , the supreme court, after referring to the enlargement of the powers of the parliament under the proviso to art. 254(2) of the constitution of india, pointed out that under that proviso, parliament can do what the central legislature could not under s. 107(2) of the government of india act, and enact a law adding to, amending, varying or repealing a law of the state, when it relates to a matter mentioned in the concurrent list and that under the constitution, parliament acting under the proviso to art. 254(2) could repeal a state law and even when it does not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 1941 (PC)

Krishnaswami Reddiar Alias Rajah Chidambara Reddiar Vs. Venugopala Red ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1942Mad614; (1942)1MLJ137

..... to the appropriate canons of construction.3. the first provisions for consideration are sections 292 and 293 of the government of india act. they correspond with sections 148 and 149 of the government of burma act, except of course that in the burma act the word 'burma' is substituted for 'british india'. section 292 of the government of india act is as follows:existing law of india to continue in force. notwithstanding the repeal by this act of the government of india act, but subject to the other provisions of this act, all the law in force in british india immediately before the commencement of part iii of this act shall continue in force in british india until altered' or repealed or amended by a competent legislature or other competent authority.the effect .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 1948 (PC)

G. Narayanaswami Naidu and ors. Vs. Inspector of Police and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1949CriLJ405

..... that the instructions of the governor- general have been obtained must be accepted as correct especially since nothing has been shown to the contrary. i do not see how it can be successfully urged that the provisions of section 88, government of india act, have not been properly complied with, on 25th may 1948, the legislature was not in session, the ordinance recites that the governor is satisfied that immediate action is necessary. i am not prepared to agree with the contentions of the ..... 38 (l) would in that view be, in effect, the satisfaction of the governor on such advice. satisfaction in accordance with the wording of section 88 (x) is recited in the preamble, and there is no proof to the contrary. under section 61 (4), government of india act.the question whether any and, if so, what advice was tendered by ministers to the governor shall not be inquired into in any court.this excludes all discussion of an allegation that' no advice was or could have been tendered, but even .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 2012 (HC)

K. Jayalakshmi Represented by their Power of Attorney Geetha Sundar an ...

Court : Chennai

..... t the compensation has been paid to the petitioners especially when the petitioner plead that they have not received any compensation. hence, where the possession has not been taken over by the government such lands are also attracted the amending act 20 of 1999 and consequently, the government cannot claim any right over such lands. 13.as already held when the petitioners are in possession of the land, even assuming that they have received the compensation it is open to them to refund ..... in question was covered under the land ceiling proceedings and therefore, the patta, as requested by the petitioners, cannot be issued. in such circumstances, the petitioners have preferred the present writ petition before this court, under article 226 of the constitution of india. 8. in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents it has been stated that the original owner of the land in question, one baby ammal, wife of thiru.r.venkataramulu chettiar, had filed the return of the lands owned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 26 1924 (PC)

G. Krishnaswami Aiyar, High Court Vakil and anr. Vs. T.V. Swaminatha A ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1925Mad385; (1925)48MLJ36

..... practise before the supreme court. a mayor's court was established in madras in 1753. it was superseded by the establishment of the recorder's court in 1798. the supreme court of madras was established by a royal charter in 1800 by virtue of the government of india act of 1800. the letters patent of that year contained the following provision as regards the practitioners of that court : they 'authorized and empowered the supreme court of judicature to approve, admit and enrol such and so many persons being bona fide ..... this : under section 3 of 11 and 12 vict., ch. 21, a parliamentary act, only advocates and attorneys are allowed to practise in the court for the relief of insolvent debtors. then in 1879 the government of india passed the legal practitioners act under' which in general terms high court vakils on the rolls of any of the high courts are accorded the right of practice in all the courts in british india except the high court on the rolls of which they are not so enrolled. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 1973 (HC)

Controller of Estate Duty Vs. Estate of Late H.R. Goosey (by K.S. Naga ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1974]97ITR193(Mad)

..... 1, 1954, this is referred to as a de facto transfer and was intended to be followed up by de jure transfer. a treaty of cession providing for the de jure transfer was signed by the government of france and the government of india on may 28, 1956. this treaty of cession envisaged a ratification of the same by the respective governments in order that the de jure transfer may take effect. following the de facto transfer the government of india was administering the territory under the foreign jurisdiction act, 1947, and in accordance with the french establishments (administration) order, 1954, and other orders made under sections 3 and 4 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //