Government Of India Act 1935 Repealed Section 167 - Judgment Search Results

H.H. Maharajadhiraja Madhav Rao Jivaji Rao ScIndia Bahadur of Gwalior ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1971SC530; (1971)1SCC85; [1971]3SCR9

..... act 1947 that is why sections 290a and 290b were inserted by the government of india act amendment act 1949 into the government of india act 1935 for effecting integration of merged states 376 section 290a of the government of india act 1935 ..... of india the government of india act 1935 which now governs the constitutional relationship between this state and the dominion of india will stand repealed .....

Sree Rajendra Mills Limited and Others Vs. Income-tax Officer, Central ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1958Mad220; [1957]32ITR439(Mad)

view of its juridical basis namely the transition from a government for which the ultimate responsibility rested with the parliament of british india to continue in operation in the dominion of india which newly emerged without a provision in terms of section indian legislatures by section 110 of the government of indian act 1935 which enacte nothing in this act shall be taken sections 2 and 173 of the government of india act 1935 on the same day 14th of august 1947 the governor amended by the government of india act 1919 having been repealed by the government of india act 1935 there was a part vii bearing the caption property contracts liabilities and suits section 172 with which that chapter opens distributed lands and buildings

Krishna Kumar Singh and Anr Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

twenty nine sanskrit schools named in schedule1 by the state government clause 3 was as follows 3 taking over of management than six months from its promulgation under the government of india act 1915 the power to issue ordinances was retained in the ordinances form a part of a chain of executive acts designed to nullify the scheme of article 213 they take bringing in section 90 of the government of india act 1935 into our constitution through the back door 65 it seems the rights and liabilities under an ordinance which had been repealed did not stand extinguished on the enactment of a fresh pure question of the interpretation of sub section 3 of section 11 of the emergency powers defence act 1939 it was

K.L. Johar and Co. Vs. the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Coimbatore I ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1965SC1082; [1965]16STC213(SC)

48 of list ii of the seventh schedule to the government india act 1935 or under entry 54 of list ii of india act 1935 beyond what it meant in the indian sale of goods act no 3 of 1930 the state under the law contained in the indian sale of goods act it is clear that if the explanation is good the of the seventh schedule to the government of india act 1935 in 1955 1scr243 it held that entry 48 in question high court be brought within the charging provisions of the section the high court therefore held that explanation i to section

Northern India Hotels Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1984]55STC68(All)

78 prior to coming into force of the constitution the government of india act 1935 under entry 48 of list ii medhi v state of bombay air 1959 sc 459 british india general insurance co ltd v captain itbar singh i960 1 any matter arising out of the u p sales tax act 1948 55 i will first take up the question as into force of the constitution the government of india act 1935 under entry 48 of list ii of the seventh schedule the date of the vesting ordinance 27 of 1949 was repealed by the act which contained provisions as to vesting in statute 75 the opening part of sub section 1 of section 6 provides that the expression tax on the sale or

Bhagat Singh Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1960SC1210; 1960CriLJ1671; [1961]1SCR64

that might have arisen because of s 243 of the government of indian act he therefore dismissed the appeal 7 then 1861 re 1 9 section 243 of the government of india act appears in chapter ii of part x dealing with was placed on sections 29 and 35 of the police act no v of 1861 re 1 9 section 243 of governed by s 240 3 of the government india act 1935 and it was reinforced in this conclusion by the police placed on sections 29 and 35 of the police act section 29 provides for penalties for neglect of duty etc by

National Mineral Development Corporation Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka by ...

Court : Karnataka

..... a departure from section 107 of the government of india act 1935 power of the central legislature is 338 enlarged enabling the central legislature to enact a law adding to amending varying or repealing a law ..... sale it was a disposal that the levy of the tax was within the legislative 167 competence having regard to the entries 23 49 54 of list ii that even if .....

National Mineral Development Corporation Limited, rep. by its Regional ...

Court : Karnataka

or to the corporations owned or controlled by the state government from whom the purchases have been made having regard to to clause 2 of article 254 of the constitution of india is a departure from section 107 of the government of apply to the impugned act which was a post constitution act and assuming it applied as there was no declaration made 48 of list ii to the government of india act 1935 after the commencement of the constitution of india the power the state of karnataka prior to its reorganization have been repealed by the act except to the extent they have been it for re afforestation explanation for the purpose of this section non forest purpose means the breaking up or clearing of orissa cement limited vs state of orissa air 1991 sc 1676 it was held that the finding regarding invalidity of the

Rama Chandra Misra Vs. President, District Board

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1951Ori1; 17(1951)CLT10

..... a federal law or an existing indian law section 107 government of india act 1935 has absolutely no application if there is such ..... government of india act 1935 prior to the adaptations made in 19 17 after the passing of the indian independence act 15 i would therefore hold that the schedule 66 of the madras act was not repealed ..... ramchandra v emperor a i r 17 1930 bom 167 31 or l j 931 khusi ram v .....

Shambhu Nath Ghosh and ors. Vs. Bejoy Lakshmi Cotton Mills Ltd. and or ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1959Cal552

..... sections 51 and 59 of the government of india act 1935 and the business rules that the home minister was an officer subordinate to the governor since that case was decided the government of india act 1935 has been repealed ..... the executive and having regard to the provisions of articles 164 1 166 3 and 167 of the constitution a minister is in law still an officer subordinate to the governor .....