Goods And Services - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: goods and services Page 1 of about 8 results (0.032 seconds)Central Gst Delhi Iii Vs. Delhi International Airport Ltd
Court: Supreme Court of India
service rendered, an amount charged, or value of service or goods provided without a consideration, would not be a taxing incident. or development of an airport results in better infrastructure and services to passengers. Collection of the DF could 9 facilitate and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTReliance Cable Industries vs.commissioner of Gst (East) Delhi
Court: Delhi
have been assumed to be pertaining to the sale of goods manufactured and cleared clandestinely. 14.1 I find the truth to the total circumstances of the case, the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) was justified in rejecting the appeal
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTReliance Cable Industries vs.commissioner of Gst (East), Delhi
Court: Delhi
the factory was not enough to manufacture the quantum of goods alleged to have been cleared clandestinely. It has been argued the total circumstances of the case, the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) was justified in rejecting the appeal
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN & N Chopra Consltants Pvt. Ltd. Vs.principal Commissioner, Goods & S ...
Court: Delhi
Aldak, Mr. Kunal Kapoor, Advocates ..... Appellant versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, GOODS & SERVICE TAX &CENTRAL EXCISE,DELHI EAST Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh The assessee is engaged in providing commercial coaching and training services and therefore, he is subject to service tax levy under
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSudhir Kumar Aggarwal vs.directorate General of Gst Intelligence
Court: Delhi
enquiry under Customs Act primarily relates to the smuggling of goods. Section 108 confers W.P. (CRL) 2686/2019 Page 12 of 14 do not lay down that the police must secure the services of a lawyer. That will to police-station-lawyer system, an abuse
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Tax, Gst Delhi East vs.m/s Indian Railway Finance Corp ...
Court: Delhi
evade payment of service tax. The argument should be rejected. Goodness and precocious conduct of the respondent Corporation in making payment respondent-Corporation was liable to pay service tax on the aforesaid services under clause (12), Section 65 of Chapter-V of the Finance
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRadico Khaitan Limited vs.principal Commissioner of Gst & Central Exci ...
Court: Delhi
Mehta and Mr. Kunal Kapoor, Advocates. versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF GST & CENTRAL EXCISE DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, a show cause notice which alleged that it was receiving services from M/s Jefferies International Limited (JIL) and that for the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCce Delhi -1 (Now Principal Commissioner of Gst Delhi North) vs.jindal ...
Court: Delhi
a serious charge of clandestine production and removal of excisable goods. Further, these statements have yet to be tested on cross-examination. 2019 + CEAC502018 CCE DELHI -1 (NOW PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF GST DELHI NORTH) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pratap Singh Ahluwalia, Adv.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>