Gold Mines - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: gold mines Page 1 of about 57 results (0.024 seconds)Calhoun Gold Mining Co. Vs. Ajax Gold Mining Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
182 U.S. 499 (1901) Calhoun Gold Mining Company v. Ajax Gold Mining Company No.195 Argued March 13-14, 1901 Decided May 27, Revised Statutes only provides for easements for the development of mines, and the section of Mills relied upon does not attempt
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBharat Gold Mines Officers' Association, Kolar Gold Fields and Ors. Vs ...
Court: Karnataka
Reported in: AIR2001Kant257; 2002(1)KarLJ130
Government of India, Mr. K.S.R. Chari observed that the Kolar Gold Mines history over a century has been one of a have been processed by the Government. The Director, Ministry of Mines stated the issue of global tenders by the company was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBharath Gold Mines Ltd. by Its Managing Director Vs. the Industrial Cr ...
Court: Karnataka
Reported in: 2009(6)AIRKarR477
object of the company is to extract gold in Kolar Gold Fields (KGF) and surrounding areas. Originally the said gold fields for producing gold.Finances have not been provided for revival/modernization of mines.The prospect of opening up shallow mines has not been fully
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHarmony Gold Mining Company Ltd. Vs. Regional Director Free State Depa ...
Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
uncontaminated water relatively close to the surface. Many years of gold mining resulted in all the mines in the KOSH area water that might affect the current and future operations of mines in the KOSH area and to share the costs of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Hutti Gold Mines Company Limited Vs. H.G.M.L. Copper Units Officer ...
Court: Karnataka
decided to close down the copper mining units and started gold mining. Though common pay scale was introduced with effect from 12-7-1985 amalgamated the said copper mining companies in Hutti Gold Mines Company Limited in “as is where is” condition specifying the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTYosemite Gold Mining and Milling Co. Vs. Emerson
Court: US Supreme Court
Yosemite Gold Mining & Milling Co. v. Emerson - 208 U.S. 25 M. Company, 1 Nev. 188. Lindley, in his work on Mines, seems to prefer the California rule as a "safe and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Hutti Gold Mines Kamgar Sangh Vs. Government of India and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Reported in: (1973)ILLJ46AP
1965 is assailed in this writ petition filed by Hutti Gold Mines Kamgar Sangh, against their employer, the Hutti Gold Mines Indian law.32. The Hutti Gold Mines Company Limited, Hutti Gold Mines, the 2nd respondent herein, is a company governed by the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHutti Gold Mines Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (1983)LC701DTri(Delhi)
of 1952) or..." 4. The contention is that the Hatti Gold Mines is a "mine" falling within the meaning of the Bangalore, to the effect that the mill at Hatti Gold Mines wherein recovery of gold and silver from the gold bearing
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPlymouth Gold Mining Co. Vs. Amador Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Plymouth Gold Mining Co. v. Amador Co. - 118 U.S. 264 (1886) said defendant E. L. Montgomery is the superintendent of the mines and mills of your petitioner, and has no interest whatever
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHatti Gold Mines Co.ltd A Company Incorported Vs. S.madavreddy S/o S.n ...
Court: Karnataka Kalaburagi
mining activities at UTI mines and called tender for transporting gold ore and then contract of transportation was allotted to respondent UTI mines. Therefore, the appellant-Company started mining activities at UTI mines and called tender for transporting gold ore and then contract
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>