Goa Daman And Diu Judicial Commissioner S Court Declaration As High Court Act 1964 Repealed Section 8 - Judgment Search Results

Kailash Moudgil Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (2000)72ITD97(Delhi)

special bench order fortunately we came across a decision of goa daman amp diu judicial commissioner s court clarifying the meaning bench order fortunately we came across a decision of goa daman amp diu judicial commissioner s court clarifying the meaning of fortunately we came across a decision of goa daman amp diu judicial commissioner s court clarifying the meaning of the word case should the high court act arbitrarily or along non judicial lines such as directing a transfer without recording reasons and approval to the commissioner or after putting it to the commissioner a copy of it should be served to the assessee irregular but not null and void the hon ble supreme court held at page 738 as follows an omission to serve of fact when the law dealing with the subject has declared those findings as final and conclusive secondly it was contended sanction essential in that case even the direction of the high court directing the sanctioning authority to grant sanction was given adjudication and is seldom construed as requiring a mere ministerial act but rather embraces both direction and confirmation the term sometimes requirements of section 6 of the income tax management act 1964 under the provisions of which the late assessments to which or penalty under the provisions of clause c of sub section 1 of section 271 or section 271a or section 271b swadeshi cotton mills v union of india air 1981 sc 818 at pages 846 47 their lordships held the following where

Shri Sanjay Z. Rane, Vs. Smt. Saibai S. Dubaxi (Since Deceased Through ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR2668

..... for any such intra court appeals goa daman and diu judicial commissioner s court declaration as high court act 1964 was then brought into force with effect from 16 12 1963 and section 8 of the said act repealed section 7 of 1962 act attention has been invited .....

Meghalaya Plywoods Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

defect can be remedied only by legislation and not by judicial interpretation this principle of law finds its place in a apex court rendered in shrimati tarulata shyam and ors v commissioner of income tax west bengal reported in 1977 108itr345 sc reference can be made to the decision of delhi high court rendered in india trade promotion organisation v dy assessor and aforementioned show cause notice dated 8 12 86 and for declaration that such show cause notice is illegal unjust unconstitutional and the petitioner and such delay is not satisfactorily explained the high court may decline to intervene and grant relief in exercise 1997 3scr1160 held that the proper forum under the companies act being available for considering the grievance of the petitioner resorting del 1989 42 elt338 sc 1983 elt 1342 sc air 1964 1 gau fb 1968 1scr148 1994 2 glr 239 gau relevant date in view of the provisions laid down under section 11a of the act the main contention of the writ sought for in the said title suit no 10 h 88 on perusal of the plaint as in annexure a to

Meghalaya Plywoods Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

defect can be remedied only by legislation and not by judicial interpretation this principle of law finds its place in a apex court rendered in shrimati tarulata shyam and ors v commissioner of income tax west bengal reported in 1977 108itr345 sc alternative remedy under the act in this regard the apex court in a case between sri ramdas motor transport ltd and aforementioned show cause notice dated 8 12 86 and for declaration that such show cause notice is illegal unjust unconstitutional and oral evidence to be taken and on that account the high court is of the view that the dispute should not there is alternative remedy available for appeal under the relevant acts and rules the writ petitioner concealed the real existing facts del 1989 42 elt338 sc 1983 elt 1342 sc air 1964 1 gau fb 1968 1scr148 1994 2 glr 239 gau infraction of the provisions of the law laid down under sections 100 103 105 1 110 165 210 and 353 of proceedings under the impugned show cause notice dated 8 12 86 sri bhattra further contended that the search and seizure at

Mrs.N.Ratnakumari Vs. State of Odisha and Others

Court : Orissa

into force on 4th february 1995 in the state of goa himanchal pradesh and all the union territories and thereafter it hours of such arrest so that an independent authority exercising judicial powers may without delay apply its mind to his case completion of medical treatment the requisition was made to the commissioner of police visakhapatnam city to provide escort party on 17 committed to judicial custody or police custody by the competent court by an order which prime facie does 60 no appear of any medical fitness certificate 12 8 by filing additional affidavit it was contended by the petitioner that 1994 toho act of the hon ble supreme court as well as different high courts including our own high court that when a power much as state of andhra pradesh has no adopted this act under article 252 1 of constitution of india and 1995 any act so passed by parliament may be amended or repealed by an act of parliament passed or adopted in like is section 41 of cr p c relevant provisions of section 41 cr p c reads as follows 41 when police 2014 in the matter of application under section 48 57 80 81 41 and 41 a of cr p c and

Present: Mr. Dinesh Kumar Advocate Vs. Daler Singh and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

the court this view has been reiterated in state of goa v sanjay thakran 2007 3 scc 755 and chandrappa v one hand and acquittal on the other the preponderance of judicial opinion of this court is that there is no substantial the village and accused challenged the same before the deputy commissioner sangrur it was set aside by the orders of deputy that fir passed by hon ble punjab and haryana high court 11f thus whole of this discussion proves that the aggrieved the material evidence or has ignored material documents like dying declaration report of ballistic experts etc the appellate court is competent of that fir passed by hon ble punjab and haryana high court 11f thus whole of this discussion proves that the court when the order regarding summoning of accused under that act has been reversed much arguments rather almost whole of the section 3 of the sc st act the order qua sections 323 and 506 of ipc kumar virender 2013 07 19 this document crm a 240 ma of 2012 o m 8 we are of the opinion that the matter would have

Sudarshan Plywood Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Guwahati

said issue has been set at rest by the quasi judicial authority vi the petitioner has annexed all the said judicial ayrshire punman motor services and d m rihie v the commissioner of inland revenue 1929 14 tax case 754 at 763 saraa plywood industries ltd v union of india where this court has held that the respondents are bound to accept the for the purposes of analogy only column 9 contains the declaration as to the nature and extent of the expenses without ble mr justice j s khehar chief justice of uttarakhand high court and shri p p rao senior advocate was examining central excises and salt act 1944 hereinafter called as the act for the alleged violation of various provisions of the central was advanced on behalf of the respondents as fo lows section 11a provides a complete code and is an independent provision 62 155 order 125 83 dated annx g pg 10 8 1983 161 price lists 4 9 10 80 order 124

M.i. Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Reported in : (2008)117TTJLuck42

passed by the ld cit a who is a quasi judicial authority is not a reasoned order she has confirmed the assessing officer was to refer the matter to the chief commissioner as provided under sub section 2 in any case invoking on the ground that as required by hon ble supreme court in the case of gkn driveshafts india ltd v income supported enlarged or strengthened by subsequent material no outside material affidavit could be imported to throw light on such reasons for held to be legally valid hon ble p amp h high court in lt col paramjit singh v cit supra relied in passing the order under section 144 of the it act as the appellant had complied with each and every requirement merits the learned d r submitted that in spite of repealed notices and opportunities assessee did not produce the books of k v kader haji deed v cit clarified distinction between sections 120 and 127 it was held that section 120 uses the re opening of the vide its letters dated 19 8 04 15 9 04 and 21 02 05 6 on

Zacarias Durate Dmoingos Pereira Vs. Camilo Inacil Evaristo Pereira

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1984Bom295

as from the coming into force of this act in goa daman and diu provided that the repeal shall not affect indian code has been extended to the territory of goa daman and diu and reading the provisions of the goa daman diu and reading the provisions of the goa daman and diu civil courts act the forum for appeals and revisions shall my attention three more authorities of the court of the judicial commissioner the judicial commissioner shri tito de menezes by his of maters while referring to the order of the judicial commissioner supra referred to to dated 27th march 1980 he reiterated so he usefully referred to the authority of the supreme court in maria pereira pinto air1979sc1352 referred to supra 23 from provided further that subject to the proceeding proviso notifications published declarations and rules made places appointed agreements filed awards made or who has since been elevated to the bench of this high court held that the auction in the inventory proceedings cannot be deemed to not have been repealed by the extension act of 1965 i am fortified in this view that in any chapter or section or provision of any law hereby repealed such reference shall so far as may be practicable be the arbitration act of 1940 to goa daman and diu section 4 1 of the goa daman and diu extention of then hon ble judicial commissioner in civil revision application no 86 81 referred to supra wherein the he held that by

Cadar Constructions Vs. Tara Tiles

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1984Bom258; 1984(2)BomCR530; 1984MhLJ603

..... act the jurisdiction of the high court of judicature at bomaby was extended to the union territory of goa daman and diu and from the appointed day the court of the judicial commissioner was abolised section ..... the periods of limitation existing in the civil code to declare the nullity of a contract entered into under the portuguese law are also repealed in our opinion with great respect this is the .....