Goa Daman And Diu Judicial Commissioner S Court Declaration As High Court Act 1964 Repealed Section 5 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: goa daman and diu judicial commissioner s court declaration as high court act 1964 repealed section 5 Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 317 results (7.299 seconds)Muthoot Finance Limited Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
above observations the writ petition stands disposed of 10 registrar judicial is directed to forward a copy of this order to a copy of this order to the chairman karnataka law commission sd suraj govindaraj judge sr list no 3 sl no khc 53354 wp no 36201 of 2024 deposit with the court seized of the matter on coming to the conclusion that is before this court seeking for the following reliefs a declare that the interference by the respondents in petitioners business for 2024 khc 53354 wp no 36201 of 2024 in the high court of karnataka at bengaluru dated this the31t day of between muthoot finance limited a company incorporated under the companies act1956head office at muthoot chambers opp saritha thatre complex banerjee road 454 of the earlier code of criminal procedure and now section 500 of the bnss were to be filed of course company is vested with a duty to carry out proper 5 nc 2024 khc 53354 wp no 36201 of 2024 due
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs. X Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
protection of rights act 2019 affidavit should be on non judicial stamp paper of rs 10 competent notary civil district name this order to the hon ble chairperson of the law commission of karnataka sd suraj govindaraj judge ln list no 1 is in that background that the petitioner is before this court seeking for the above reliefs 4 ms aparna mehrotra learned no size photographs enclosed documents as mentioned in the application declaration 1 i declare that the particulars furnished by me are khc 49110 wp no 55559 of 2017 r in the high court of karnataka at bengaluru dated this the20h day of coming into effect of the transgender persons protection of rights act 2019 hereinafter referred to as the transgender act the rights and entitlements of such person under this act 29 sub section 2 of section 7 provides for a certificate to be a transgender identity card in form 5 to the applicant 5 the appropriate governments shall maintain a register for the issuance
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr Mohankumar M Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
recorded and the income of the petitioner declared in the income tax returns is maximum rs 8 lakhs per year and heard and reserved for orders on0412 2024 this day the court pronounced the following coram hon ble mr justice h p rs 25 lakhs out of his income which has been declared in his income tax returns he also not disputes that in paragraph no 15 an observation is made that the high court was required to consider whether a prima facie case 1 e read with 13 2 of prevention of corruption act and section 109 of ipc and payment is made directly is barred as for example the remedy by way of section 115 of the code of civil procedure 1908 this court 02 2012 he got transferred an amount of rs 8 50 000 from the sb account of his wife out of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrindavan Hydropower Private Limited Vs. Union Of India
Court : Karnataka
no way means that the regulatory commissions should follow formal judicial approach in fact quick disposal of matters would require an exclusively to the appropriate commission and it had made the commission secondary and subservient to it and that this was fundamentally orders on2507 2024 coming on for pronouncement this day the court made the following coram the hon ble mr justice n generation of electricity 69 section 7 of the electricity act declared that any generating company could establish operate and maintain a differential in prices to promote these technologies 65 the above highlighted portions of the electricity policy make it absolutely clear and to frame rules to carry out the provisions of the act he submitted that section 176 2 of the act provided the erstwhile andhra pradesh electricity reforms act 1998 which was repealed by the electricity act 2003 a two judge bench of those sub sections 94 as could be seen from sub section 1 of section 42 of the electricity act it would the aspect of granting open access 75 nc 2024 khc 53048 wp no 11235 of 2024 c w wp no 22770
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri. Chennakeshava Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
to the government land and property if the complaint discloses commission of offences only under the indian penal code or under act after 2013 and also brought to notice of this court judgment of andhra pradesh and tamil nadu high court and that land grabbing in any form is hereby prohibited and declared unlawful and any activity 18 connected with or arising out 1 r in the high court of karnataka at bengaluru dated this the20h day of ipc offences and furthermore sections 3 and 4 of the act is very clear that punishment is not less than one under section 192 a of the karnataka land revenue act 1964 and section 420 of ipc no doubt the apex court taken note of section 420 of ipc as well as sections 2 f and 3 of the act and 24 so in crl p no 6731 of2014c w crl p no 5688 of2014 crl p no 2665 2013 and connected petitions decided
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s H M Infra Tech Pvt Ltd Vs. H M Tamborine Apartments Owners Associa ...
Court : Karnataka
of order vii rule 11 is very limited and the court has to looked into the averments of the plaint not 1 r in the high court of karnataka at bengaluru dated this the20h day of of section 14 71 and 21 79 of the rera act and rightly comes to the conclusion that the plaint is and the trial court in detail discussed with regard to section 14 of the act the counsel also brought to notice no 2457 2024 inj c w miscellaneous first appeal no 5580 2017 cpc in r f a no 2457 2024 between
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Re ...
Court : Karnataka
be dismissed this again is a over reach of the judicial proceedings resorted to by sridevi hospital and dr senthilnathan 35 the cancellation in the register maintained by him iv the commissioner of stamps and inspector general of registration is directed to arcil has played fraud practised coercion and suppressed before the courts various aspects if at all there is any grievance it dr senthilnathan was well within his rights to execute a declaration as regards the property relating to sridevi of which he filed insolvency petition no 55 2013 before the hon ble high court of madras was declared as an insolvent by the by its promoter dr senthilnathan have indulged in various illegal activities 21 3 by referring to the letter of the senior of 2017 wp no 9578 of 2017 further action under section 37 the said letter is addressed to district registrar rajajinagara as annexure o and p respectively 7 nc 2024 khc 53360 wp no 28962 of 2015 c w wp no 9193
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Regist ...
Court : Karnataka
be dismissed this again is a over reach of the judicial proceedings resorted to by sridevi hospital and dr senthilnathan 35 the cancellation in the register maintained by him iv the commissioner of stamps and inspector general of registration is directed to or dr senthilnathan to have agitated the same before a court of competent jurisdiction any document which is registered by a the said deed of assignment has executed the deed of declaration and cancellation agreement and no fault can be found with filed insolvency petition no 55 2013 before the hon ble high court of madras was declared as an insolvent by the only if compliance is made of the requirement of the act and rules that the document will proceed for registration a 1993 and registered with the reserve bank of india under section 3 of sarfaesi act 5 the facts in each of 2010 in the office of the 24 nc 2024 khc 53360 wp no 28962 of 2015 c w wp no 9193
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri.k. Lokesh Vs. The Bangalore District Maintenance And Welfare Of Pa ...
Court : Karnataka
to be rendered would not embark upon the exercise of judicial interpretation thereof and nothing is to be added or taken the order dated 24 01 2024 passed by the deputy commissioner preferred writ petition no 3165 of 2024 learned single judge respondent no 2 to agitate their rights before the competent court of law 6 nc 2024 khc 53004 db wa no influence and shall at the option of the transferor be declared void by the tribunal 2 where any senior citizen has is unnecessary with due respect 42 the punjab and haryana high court has held that section 16 1 of the act courts to contend that appeal under section 16 of the act is maintainable by other than the senior citizen the first by providing the amenities 10 3 the father has invoked section 23 of the act under the misdirection of the siblings the petitioner through a registered will dated 14 07 2023 5 respondent no 2 preferred appeal before the deputy commissioner under
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Lancer Finance Vs. The Competent Authority
Court : Karnataka
letter dated 13 03 2017 issued by the additional deputy commissioner to the assistant commissioner mysore sub division mysore to submit the judgment of devinder singh s case and the apex court held that formation of opinion must precede application of mind appeal before the apex court does not amount to any declaration of law but is only binding upon the parties to not destroy the binding effect of the judgment of the high court as a precedent because while granting the interim order in making payment to his customers hence provisions of kpidfe act cannot be attracted and there is no cause of action order the trial court also taken note of scope of section 3 2 in paragraph no 13 b and so also has reported for non payment of deposited amount of rs 51 00 000 by the respondents the police commissioner mysore who
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT