Skip to content


Generate - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: generate Year: 1998 Page 1 of about 303 results (0.018 seconds)
Jun 11 1998 (TRI)

Naveen Kedia and ors. Vs. Chennai Power Generation Limited

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: Jun-11-1998

Reported in: (1999)95CompCas640

..... three parties namely petitioner no 9 respondent no 1 which was then known as gvk generation ltd and respondent no 2 it was agreed that petitioner no 9 with its associates ..... case the original agreement was entered into for the purpose of establishing a project for generation and supply of electricity in the state of tamil nadu and the principal agreement as .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 16 1998 (HC)

Ntpc Vs. Spectrum Power Generation Co. Ltd. and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-16-1998

Reported in: 1998VAD(Delhi)328; 74(1998)DLT500

s n kapoor j 1 in this suit the ntpc seeks a decree for specific performance against defendants no 1...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 19 1998 (TRI)

Punjab Power Generation Machines Vs. C.C.E.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-19-1998

Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT1155TriDel

1 appellant is absent in spite of notice of hearing there is no request for adjournment appellant was also absent...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 16 1998 (HC)

Spectrum Technologies Usa Inc. Vs. Spectrum Power Generation Co. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-16-1998

Reported in: 1998VAD(Delhi)237; 74(1998)DLT574; 1998(46)DRJ441

orders n kapoor j 1 the crux of the dispute in this matter depends on an answer to the question...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 12 1998 (TRI)

Collector of Central Excise Vs. U.P. State Electricity Board

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-12-1998

Reported in: (1999)(63)ECC225

..... plants the appellant has urged that as per notification no 51 78 electricity generated by one generating station when utilised for running the auxiliary plant of another station would ..... exemption for electricity supplied to auxiliary plants which were definitely not engaged in generation of electricity but for distribution transmission and other collateral activity station transformers water .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 27 1998 (HC)

Arun Kumar Agrawal and Another Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-27-1998

Reported in: 1999(1)KarLJ603

..... the interests of the common consumer according to them the power to be generated by the generating company due to various cost padding is likely to cost upwards by rs ..... orders with certain foreign firms stipulating certain facilities conditions for private participation in power generation memorandum of understandings mous were signed for 10 foreign companies including cogentrix for their .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 16 1998 (TRI)

Mak Controls Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jun-16-1998

Reported in: (1998)(61)ECC296

..... and performs the function only servicing aircraft alone and cannot be used as a generator elsewhere for generation of electricity when this be the position the question is whether in the context ..... reason of its exclusive use with the aircrafts and being something totally different from the generators as understood in the trade he has therefore pleaded that the gpu for assessment purposes .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 15 1998 (FN)

Phillips Vs. Washington Legal Foundation

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-15-1998

..... judgment to petitioners reasoning that respondents had no property interest in the interest proceeds generated by the funds held in iolta accounts washington legal foundation v texas equal access ..... deposited in an attorney trust account may be deprived of the interest the fund generates petitioners further contend that interest follows principal is an incomplete explication of the texas .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 30 1998 (HC)

Tata Yodogawa Limited and ors. Vs. Bihar State Electricity Board and o ...

Court: Patna

Decided on: Jun-30-1998

..... formula represents the average fuel surcharge per unit a1 b1 and c1 represent the units generated from three thermal stations of the respondent board namely patratu barauni and muzaffarpur and d1 ..... and arrive at a figure which cannot truly represent the increase in the cost of generation or purchase of electrical energy mr shanti bhushan appearing on behalf of the board submitted .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 18 1998 (TRI)

Elecon Engineering Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-18-1998

Reported in: (1998)(62)ECC95

..... or 85 the power cables are used to transport power generated from the generator to the power box and it cannot be called ..... and control system the main parts of nacelle are hub generator gear box brake caliper sensor and brake hydraulics special bearings ..... 13 of the notification covers any special devices including electric generators and pumps running on wind energy examining these conclusions of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //