Future - Judgment Search Results

Patterson Vs. South Carolina

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a psychiatric witness to testify about his general psychiatric makeup questions concerning adaptability or future nondangerousness were prohibited the witness did briefly refer to petitioner s successful adaptation to ..... cannot be tolerated by the eighth amendment the second difference is that discussions of future dangerousness in our prior cases have emphasized the defendant s dangerousness to the .....

State of Orissa and ors. Vs. Titaghur Paper Mills Company Limited and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1985SC1293; 1986(1)ARBLR135(SC); 1985(2)SCALE410; 1985Supp(1)SCC280; [1985]3SCR26; [1985]60STC213(SC)

..... where there is a contract for the sale of unascertained or future goods by description and goods of that description and in a ..... existence thereafter were concerned it was submitted that as they were future goods once they came into existence and became ripe for cutting ..... claimed that the transactions entered into by them were sales of future goods namely fish in the sections of the lake covered by .....

St. Louis Sw Ry. Vs. Dickerson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... result of petitioner s negligence respondent introduced evidence that his future wage losses would be about 1 million and petitioner requested ..... the city of st louis respondent introduced evidence that his future wage losses resulting from his injuries would over the course ..... present worth of the money which you award for such future loss the trial judge refused to submit the instruction because .....

MountaIn States Tel. Vs. Santana Ana

Court: US Supreme Court

..... fairly read as a flat prohibition against reliance on new mexico law in connection with future transactions involving pueblo lands after 1924 alienation of those lands voluntary or involuntary was ..... secretary of the interior could adequately protect the interests of the pueblos in connection with future land transactions this construction is supported by the language of 16 allowing for the .....

Eutzy Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

..... as a test for relevance even as to aggravating circumstances in contrast the issue of future dangerousness repeatedly has been accepted as relevant to valid penological concerns see patterson v ..... estelle 463 u s 880 903 906 3399 3401 1984 given that speculative evidence of future dangerousness has been so willingly declared relevant for aggravation it would simply be constitutionally intolerable .....

Laxmi Furniture and Saw Mills, Simla Vs. Himachal Pradesh Financial Co ...

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1985HP108

..... that the respondent is not entitled to the recovery of future interest by future interest what is meant is the interest accruing due ..... the act the district judge has the power to award future interest arose for consideration the following pertinent observations made in ..... that the proceedings for recovery of the amount inclusive of future interest being before the executing court the validity of an .....

B. Prabhakar Rao and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1986SC210; [1985(51)FLR501]; 1985LabIC1555; 1985(2)SCALE256; 1985Supp(1)SCC432; [1985]Supp2SCR573

..... commencing from the date of retirement of each pensioner but effective from the specified date future pension of earlier retired government servants can be computed and paid on the analogy of ..... removes the nefarious unconstitutional part and retains the beneficial portion it does not adversely affect future pensioners and their presence in the petitions becomes irrelevant but before we do so we .....

K.M.A. Ltd. Vs. K.S. Thailambal

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1986)88BOMLR89

..... on a contingency and all claims against the company present or future certain or contingent ascertained or sounding only in damages shall be ..... by sub sections and 2 all debts and liabilities present or future certain or contingent to which the debtor is subject when he ..... be deposited in court by september 25 1985 in respect of future dividends the same to be deposited in court within two months .....

Brij Lal Vs. Mangal Chand Maheshwari and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: I(1986)ACC114

..... and agony suffered by the claimant rs 20 000 towards loss of future earnings rs 10 000 on account of psychological trauma suffered by the ..... rs 1 800 and applying the multiple of sixteen his loss of future earnings would come to rs 20 000 18 taking into account the ..... injury rs 15 000 00 ii for permanent disfigurement and loss of future enjoyment rs 15 000 00 iii for medical expenditure rs 15 000 .....

Banwari Lal Kotiya Vs. P.C. Aggarwal

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1985SC1003; (1985)3CompLJ298(SC); (1985)3SCC255; [1985]Supp1SCR567; 1986(1)LC520(SC)

..... an arbitration agreement to mean a written agreement to submit present or future differences to arbitration whether an arbitrator is named therein or not ..... as defined in section 2 a covers not merely present but future differences also in other words in such a case there will ..... a of the arbitration act and that if disputes arise in future a reference has to be made to arbitration within the meaning .....