Formulize - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: formulize Year: 1985 Page 1 of about 294 results (0.009 seconds)T.V. Durairajulu Naidu Vs. Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitabl ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-12-1985
Reported in: AIR1989Mad60
mohan j 1 the unsuccessful plaintiff is the appellant before me he filed o s no 313 of 1975 on...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNational Insulated Cables Co. of Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-23-1985
Reported in: (1985)(21)ELT793TriDel
saturated compound ethane c2h6 butane c4h10 cyclohexane c6h12 in structural formulas unsaturation may be represented by parallel lines joining the carbon
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Rajasthan Anushakati Pariyojna Karamchari San ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-10-1985
Reported in: 1985(1)WLN506
following illuminating observations there are no ready tests or invariable formulas to determine whether a provision is mandatory or directory the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSree Venkata Durga Aluminising Works Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-20-1985
Reported in: [1986]63STC445(AP)
p a choudary j 1 this tax revision case has been filed by messrs sree venkata durga aluminising works nandigama...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGlass Vs. Louisiana
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1985
value and be converted by precedent into impotent and lifeless formulas weems v united states 217 u s at 373 footnote
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNrpc Vs. Atchison, T. and S. F. Ry. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-18-1985
particular mathematical formula for reimbursement absent a showing that the formula was selected in an arbitrary or irrational manner 577 f
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBurger King Corp. Vs. Rudzewicz
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-20-1985
of appeals broader concerns and therefore reject any talismanic jurisdictional formulas the page 471 u s 486 facts of each case
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWallace Vs. Jaffree
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-04-1985
in any event our responsibility is not to apply tidy formulas by rote our duty is to determine whether the statute
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAguilar Vs. Felton
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-01-1985
1985 dissenting opinion our responsibility is not to apply tidy formulas by rote our duty is to determine whether the statute
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ.R. Vohra Vs. India Export House Pvt. Ltd. and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-14-1985
Reported in: AIR1985SC475; 1985(1)SCALE219; (1985)1SCC712; [1985]2SCR899; 1985(17)LC721(SC)
..... harjit singh bedi jj second appeal concurrent finding of fact interference without formulating substantial question of law despite clear enunciation of law by supreme court held it ..... substantial question of law such question has to be formulated at the time of admission of appeal decision rendered without formulating such question cannot be sustained section 100 dalveer bhandari .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial