Forfeitable - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: forfeitable Year: 1952 Page 1 of about 50 results (0.008 seconds)Bathalur Naranappa Vs. Uppacharla Gurappa and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-13-1952
Reported in: AIR1954Kant23; AIR1954Mys23; ILR1953KAR344; (1954)32MysLJ170
..... of immovable property breach of contract by purchaser held defendant seller is not entitled to forfeit earnest money in the absence of forfeiture clause in agreement however earnest money was allowed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSubba Rao Vs. B. Venkata Rao and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-05-1952
Reported in: AIR1953Kant27; AIR1953Mys27
..... of immovable property breach of contract by purchaser held defendant seller is not entitled to forfeit earnest money in the absence of forfeiture clause in agreement however earnest money was allowed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Bihar Vs. Maharajadhiraja Sir Kameshwar Singh of Darbhang ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-02-1952
Reported in: [1952]1SCR889
..... decrees including the costs of those suits and decrees will stand forfeited to the state in clause c the liability of the ..... by way of compensation to the proprietor or tenure holder stands forfeited by this artificial reduction of the net income clause f provides ..... realization to the state exchequer it also in an indirect manner forfeits the state exchequer part of the compensation money which would .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRavuru Punnamma Vs. Lakkaraju Venkata Subba Rao
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-06-1952
Reported in: AIR1953Mad456; (1952)2MLJ473
..... she also alleged that the defendant denied her title and therefore forfeited his rights under the document both the courts found that the ..... that the defendant denied the title of the plaintiff and therefore forfeited his rights under the document the question is whether the denial ..... the said judgments i therefore hold that the licence was not forfeited in this case 5 the next point is whether this is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHardayal and ors. Vs. Mst. Dakhan
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-29-1952
Reported in: AIR1953P& H209
..... children by nanu and the question to be decided is whether she forfeits her estate because of this fact according to the general custom of ..... is no general custom in the punjab by which a hindu widow forfeits her husband s estate when vested in her by an act of ..... which i have mentioned above according to which a widow does not forfeit her estate because of unchastity i am therefore of the opinion that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSutton Vs. Leib
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-03-1952
..... entered into between the parties about that time and that she thereby elected to forfeit and did forfeit her right to receive alimony for her own support thereafter from respondent the illinois .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMrs. Margaret Jean Massy Westmorland Wood Vs. Colonel Granville Alric ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-18-1952
Reported in: AIR1953Mad313; (1952)2MLJ758
..... plaintiff as lessor had become entitled to lawfully re enter upon the premises and to forfeit the defendant s rights under the lease the plaintiff therefore prayed for a decree in ..... defendant had not sufficiently complied with the covenants and therefore he was not liable to forfeit the lease on issue 4 he held that covenants 5 9 and 9 a were .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAtma Ram Ram Saran Vs. Mt. Chambeli and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-29-1952
Reported in: AIR1953P& H211
..... is a sufficient reason for declaring her right to her husband s estate to be forfeited the entries to the contrary in the sirsa code of customary law are set aside .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTU. Srinivas Malliah and anr. Vs. Krishna Kumar Chatterjee and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-15-1952
Reported in: AIR1952Cal804
..... leaders whose names are set out in the affidavit have left the organisation which has forfeited the confidence of the public it is denied that it has as large a number .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMani Bhai Patel Vs. the State
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-05-1952
Reported in: AIR1952Cal761,56CWN554
..... amount of the fine if already paid by him the tea which was seized and forfeited must be returned to the appellants s r das gupta j 17 i agree
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial